ministry in the traditional ethnic Chinese church

From: DCChuang@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:21:03 -0400 (EDT)
To: wans@monet.bc.edu
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: All Labels all that helpful?

In a message dated 97-09-16 09:01:49 EDT, you write:

<>

I believe what he was asking was whether most of the political posts on this
mailing list is of the liberal persuasion not that CAC is a liberal list. To
this I would have to agree from regularly reading the posts. Despite being
more conservative in my views, I find many of the posts educational and would
say this leaning is neither good nor bad.

To give Rev. Lew the benefit of the doubt, he could have been curious about
why the one-sidedness of the postings at times. On the negative side, he
could have been labeling, as you say, to which I would agree is not very
productive. As you concluded, we are Christians first and I for one would
like to see more discussion based on Biblical principles and much less of
writing off people’s views as right-wing politics or liberal propaganda.

Regards, DC

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 02:11:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: ANNOUNCE: Work. Gp. on Asian Americans & Religion

FYI, Tim

================= ANNOUNCEMENT =======================

UC Berkeley
Townsend Center for the Humanities

Working Group on
ASIAN AMERICANS & RELIGION

We are pleased to announce that the Working Group on Asian Americans and
Religion has once again received generous support from the Townsend Center.

For the 1997-98 academic year, it is the working group’s aim to highlight
new scholarship and research being conducted in this interdisciplinary
field both locally and in other parts of the country. The working group
arena provides an informal and relaxed, yet stimulating environment in
which to share and get valuable feedback on one’s work.

If you have a paper or project focusing on Asian Americans and religion
you would like to present, we are eager to hear from you….

Carolyn Chen (cechen@uclink2.berkeley.edu)
Jane Naomi Iwamura (janei@socrates.berkeley.edu)
Russell Jeung (rjeung@uclink.berkeley.edu)
Young Mi Angela Pak (ymipak@sirius.com)

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 02:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: ARTICLE: Religious Heads Urge Visa Extension

CACers:

See attached, FYI. – Tim

Religious Heads Urge Visa Extension
The Associated Press, Friday, September 12, 1997

By Darlene Superville
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) — Religious leaders urged a Senate committee Friday to
renew an immigration law that makes visas available so religious workers
from other countries can work in the United States. Mother Teresa, in a
letter written just weeks before her death, implored “help us and our
poor.”

Sen. Spencer Abraham, R-Mich., chairman of Senate Judiciary immigration
subcommittee, released the letter at a hearing of his panel and said he
planned to introduce legislation that would make permanent the religious
workers provisions of federal immigration law.

He said he was swayed on the issue by Mother Teresa, who wrote in her
letter: “Please, help us and our poor by extending this law.”

Cardinal Adam Maida of Detroit said the program is critical “not only for
religious denominations and organizations who make use of it, but also for
the individuals and communities we serve.”

Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and Patrick Leahy,
D-Vt., have agreed to be co-sponsors of his bill, Abraham said.

The Immigration Act of 1990 set aside 10,000 visas per year for “special
immigrants,” with up to 5,000 of them available to religious ministers. The
remaining 5,000 could be awarded to qualified individuals working for
religious organizations outside the United States.

The law has permitted nuns, brothers, cantors, lay preachers, religious
instructors and counselors, missionaries and others to live and work in this
country at the request U.S.-based religious organizations.

David Grunblatt, chairman of the immigration subcommittee of Agudath Israel
of America, a national organization of Orthodox Jews, urged the panel to
refrain from imposing additional restrictions on the workers.

He said House lawmakers were considering extending the law for three
additional years and including income and other restrictions, such as
requiring that workers belong to their denominations for five years before
qualifying for a visa. The current membership requirement is two years.

“We must not shut the doors, certainly to those who helped to enrich us so
much spiritually and culturally,” Grunblatt said.

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 02:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: All Labels all that helpful?

Hi Garrick and Sze-kar:

Amen to both of you! The hopes of “one bloodism” and “the beloved community”
must never yield to tribalism.

Yet, something still nags me about these statements. It is utopian to assert
that we are Christians or members of a universal human race without first
taking seriously the socio-historical consequences of our particularities
(i.e., the way we divide ourselves up along denominational-theological and
racial lines). I see few examples of “evangelicals” and “liberals” or
homosexual Christians ignoring their particularities in order to live out the
assertion that they are Christians first. I see few examples of groups
behaving as if their race played second fiddle to their common humanity.
Instead, what I see are tactics whereby one group with power defines
another group as less-than Christian or less-than human in order to justify
expulsion or self-segregation. And if one happens to be a member of a group
so-defined, all talk about the essential unity of humanity and Christianity
sound like mere platitudes.

This, of course, leads back to the question I raised about Sze-kar’s biblical
tour-de-force regarding PK. If Scripture points to an eschatological vision
where all our differences are dissolved into oneness in Christ, what recourse
and resource do those who are defined as less than Christian or human have in
the world today? The problem for me is NOT the Bible. Rather, it is trying
to find resources from Scripture to critique the idolatry of placing our
version of Christianity or our race on top of the heap and defining others as
“less than” us (Eric Erickson called this “pseudo-speciation”). Any
thoughts?

In Christ,
Tim

In a message dated 9/16/97 12:25:05 PM, you wrote:

<<In a message dated 97-09-16 09:01:49 EDT, wans@monet.bc.edu (Sze-kar Wan)
writes:

<>

Amen Sze-kar!

And I hope we all remember that we are members of the race of “human”, before
we are “Asians”. >>

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 02:13:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

Hi Clarence:

Good to hear from you. Congrats on your new role as large-group coordinator
– reminds me of my days in a similar role at NYU’s Chinese Christian
Fellowship many, many moons ago.

Here are some thoughts (they may not be useful):

1. Would an Asian American awareness event be open to the entire Wheaton
community? If it is, be prepared for some criticism regardless of how tame
you may have designed to program. Many feel threatened by anyone lifting up
their racial identities.

2. If you invite some well-respected Asian American scholar to speak [I
recommend people like Gary Okihiro (Cornell) or Him Mark Lai (US San
Francisco) or Judy Yung (UC Santa Cruz) who are more sympathetic or
respectful of Christianity], be sure to explain to them Wheaton’s context
very clearly. Sometimes I bang my head against the wall trying to explain to
Asian Americanists why being an Asian Christian is not an oxymoron.

3. Better yet, invite Asian American Christian scholars or preachers
familiar with Asian American studies to preach, lecture, or lead a workshop.
It will be good to give them this type of exposure. As Ken Fong shared
earlier, if we don’t nurture, mentor, and recognize our future leaders now,
they won’t be recognized by mainstream society tomorrow. (This raises
another pet peeve of mine: why certain Asian Christian conferences tend NOT
to invite Asian speakers) This doesn’t only apply to ministers, but also to
seminary and college professors who often feel isolated and unsupported by
their fellow Asian American Christians. I won’t embarrass them publically on
this list, but email me privately and I’ll give you the names of some Asian
American Christian scholars.

4. Contact Asian American Christian Fellowship for resources and
suggestions. You may also want to connect with the many quality Asian
American InterVarsity Christian Fellowship staff (many are in Chicagoland)
who have their ears to the ground with regards to Asian American concerns.
[I’m terribly biased, but I really like AACF and IVCF – two of the most
sensitive and sensible campus ministries around]

5. Invite Michael Chang to speak and give **free** tennis lessons.

6. Something really different: bring the many Asian Americans who have found
niches in mainline Protestant seminaries. Though most are not evangelicals,
it might be interesting to get their take.

7. Show movies that focus on the Asian American experience [Joy Luck Club
probably won’t work – too much of a tear jerker] and discuss Christian
responses. I like “Eat a Bowl of Tea” and a few others. I don’t have their
addresses with me at the moment, but I can connect you to some Asian American
film companies.

8. The Asian American Book of the Month Club: Gosh, with all the novels
written by Asian Americans these days, how can we ignore them? It will be
quite an experience to give Christian reflection on Asian American
literature!

9. Agitate for a full time, tenure (or tenure-track) Asian Americanist
faculty and department or program. At the very least, ask for courses about
the Asian American experience. The argument: we need to have a place where
Christian Asian Americanists can provide their perspectives in the field of
Asian American studies dominated by persons dismissive or antagonistic to
Christianity.

Now for some topics:

– 50 reasons why we need to understand our Asian American identities
– Asian Americans, Affirmative Action, and God
– So you think you’re a model minority?
– Hey! Where are the Asian faces in Christian history?
– The Zen of Asian American Theology
– Confucius and Christ: Friend or Foe?
– What ever happened to Connie Chung? (topic about Asian American women)
– The Musicology of Wes Terasaki
– The Gospel Beyond Black and White
– Why Asian American women don’t marry Asian American men (uh oh)
– Racial “Wreck”-conciliation or Reconciliation: the Asian American
perspective (okay, no mas)

It will be difficult to bring together worship and awareness. The moment one
brings up Asian American awareness, a statement is being made which goes
against the grain of the often unspoken belief that we should check our
particular identities at the door before we enter worship. But I admire your
willingness to take a stab at it!

All the best and God bless you in your endeavors!

In Christ,
Tim Tseng

In a message dated 9/16/97 2:43:32 AM, you wrote:

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 02:56:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

John:

I want to echo the statements regarding the need for mentoring and nurturing
by fellow ABC ministers. I also wonder whether denominations with relatively
strong Asian American constituencies can provide support for younger
ministers so that they can have the staying power for the long haul. I know
that had God not given me the calling to teach, I would have found many Asian
and non-Asian mentors within my denomination (and I know they would have
gladly helped me through difficult times).

No hard facts, but I wonder whether ABC pastors drop out …

1. because they’ve been “miseducated” in American seminaries where the Asian
and Asian American context is ignored. Is there a need for more Asian
American seminary professors who are willing to take seminarians under their
wings and support them? [yes, yes, a very self-serving question]

2. because after so many years as second on the pastoral staff totem pool,
they need outlets to express their ambitions – but cannot find it in socially
marginalized Chinese congregations. In general, I find that most people who
aspire to ministry are rather ambitious and enjoy being in leadership (at
least initially). IMHO, this is not a bad thing so long as Christian leaders
are courageous, ethical, and display servant leadership. But given the fact
that most Chinese churches are independent, there are few opportunities for
young ministers to find their potential beyond the local church (I’m not
suggesting that local church ministry is somehow less important – just that
many ministers I know get frustrated when their world is limited to the local
church). Perhaps one can compare drop out rates with degree of participation
in denominational structure.

So what to do? Unless 2-4 generation Chinese Christians consciously stay in
and help grow Chinese or Asian congregations, it doesn’t appear likely that
there will be as many openings for ABCs in the future – unless many non-Asian
congregations suddenly open their pulpits to Chinese ministers. Unless
Chinese American Christians begin to articulate an Asian American
consciousness, there will be no rationale for staying in English-speaking
Chinese (or Asian) congregations. Unless Asian American consciousness is
legitimized by ABC ministers and not dismissed as being political, they will
have no theological basis for race-specific ministries. Practicality aside,
it looks like we have to be race conscious (playing the race card?) if we are
to find futures for ABC ministers. – Tim

In a message dated 9/16/97 5:38:53 AM, you wrote:

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: All Labels all that helpful?
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 12:40:16 EDT

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997 02:13:15 -0400 (EDT) TSTseng@aol.com writes:
>Hi Garrick and Sze-kar:
> …The problem for me is NOT the Bible. Rather, it is trying
>to find resources from Scripture to critique the idolatry of placing
>our version of Christianity or our race on top of the heap and defining
>others as “less than” us (Eric Erickson called this
“pseudo-speciation”). Any
>thoughts?
>

Tim, Sze-Kar, Garrick, et. al.:

Unlike for Tim, until someone can clarify the ff., the Bible IS a
problem. I touched on this issue earlier in asking about Jesus’
Jewishness, ie. his own racial identity. For example, he retains it and
he differentiates it sharply from ‘pagans’ (‘Gentiles’, ‘the Nations’
hence non-Jews), in the Sermon on the Mount:

Matt. 5:46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are
not even the tax collectors doing that?
47 And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than
others? Do not even pagans do that?
48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
===
Matt. 6:7 And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for
they think they will be heard because of their many words.
8 Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you
ask him.
9 “This, then, is how you should pray: “‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed
be your name,
===
Matt. 6:31 So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall
we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’
32 For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father
knows that you need them.
33 But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these
things will be given to you as well.

Again, in these verses, Jesus is sharply criticizing Gentiles and saying
to his Jewish audience ‘don’t be like them!’. Them is us, I think 🙂

So, if the foregoing is accurate perception, what do you make it in the
context of dissolving racial identities in the New Creation Jesus
forged/es? In the ‘beloved community’?

I could ask similar questions about Paul’s identity. Feel free to refer
to him. I don’t think I’m asking indirectly about the role of Israel in
prophecy (in the sense of Romans 11, ff.) but basically about our (new,
current) human identity starting with, Did Jesus lose his somewhere? Is
he a Jewish man (still)? What happened to him (and/or Paul) race-wise
relative to the New Creation?

fyi: You gentlemen can probably tell from this that I’m Swedish, not
Jewish or Chinese—help!!! 🙂

Your Brother in the New Creation, G

— End —

Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 12:43:39 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Are Labels all that helpful?

Dear Garrick and Tim:

I think my statement, “I hope we are Christians first before we are
‘evangelicals,’ ‘pentacostals,’ ‘liberals,’ etc.,” has been
misunderstood. I was writing in the context of Asian-American
Christianity, in which labels like “evangelical,” “liberal,”
“pentacostal,” ought not be privilieged over against “Asian-American.”

This is not mixing categories, bc for me the so-called “theological”
labels are in fact socio-political ones. German conservative
theologians are adamant that they are not “evangelicals.” Even tho they
share much theological affinities across the Atlantic, the “evangelical”
tag carries too much North American baggage for their German shoulders.
Same goes, mutatis mutandis, for “pentacostal,” “liberal,” etc.

Rather than flattening all specifics into a featureless, abstract
“Chrstianity” (as if it were possible), I am advocating deeper
reflection on what it means to be Asian-American Christians. While I
would still privilege “Christian” over “Asian-American,” I would not,
and indeed could not, leave out the latter. A theology of the cross
stands in judgment of all relative, temporal existence, but does not
deny or replace it.

In this connection, my problem with partisan politics in the context of
CAC is not that it’s partisan but the facile assumption that one party
stands for truth and the other does, or that the politically
conservative stand for all Christians (incl. Asian-American Christians)
and the politically liberal do not. Let us not be naive: neither party
is motivated by anyone else’s but their own self-interests (almost
always those of white middle and upper-middle classes). Such are the
cold facts of Realpolitik.

The same is true with theological positions which always carry with them
sociopolitical implications. I’ve been in both evangelical and liberal
institutions. While the rhetorics might be different, the end results
with regard to Asian-American issues have always been the same: we play
second fiddle to (usually) white males. Even in supposedly enlightened
or liberal institutions in which, say, feminist, liberationist,
African-American, or Jewish causes are in the forefront, these are
invariably defined vis-a-vis white males–be it in terms of guilt (re
African-American and Jewish issues), responsibility (re liberation
theology), or struggle for power (feminism). I remember sitting in a
lecture by a well-known feminist extremist, an erstwhile heroine of
mine. Fifteen minutes into the lecture, after she had set up a
dualistic contention between men and women, it dawned on me that her
“men” were just white males. I wasn’t even good enough to be her
enemy! I was “invisible,” to use Ellison’s apt term, to her and her
adversaries. It was then I learned: To adopt labels like “liberal,”
“modernist,” “conservative,” “evangelical,” “fundamentalist,” and
whatnot unreflectively is to shirk our responsibilities as
Asian-American Christians and to be content with being led by others.

In sum, I totally agree with Tim’s call for social-locational
specificity. In due time conscience will triumph over busyness, and I
will fulfill my promise to post my notes on positive biblical warrant
for Asian-American theology.

Till then, continuing to stand under the cross,
Sze-kar

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 00:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: Are Labels all that helpful?

Sze-kar:

In a message dated 9/17/97 11:56:15 AM, Sze-kar wrote:

<>

<>

<>

Thanks for the clarification and amen to the last statement! To invalidate
our particularities would deny the significance of the Incarnation and
theology of Creation. While there are apocalyptic strands in Scripture, on
the whole, I don’t believe that God wants to annihilate His Creation, marred
as it is by sin. To do so would admit defeat and contradict God’s
omnipotence. Thus, ignoring our Chinese or Asian identities amounts to a
rejection of God’s interest in particularities and God’s hand in the way we
were “created.” I’ll state this point even more strongly: it is self-hatred.
I look forward to your future posts!

I also resonate with your thoughts concerning Realpolitick and being ignored
by extreme white feminists. It may surprise CACers that I am not all that
enamoured with political liberalism, either (I just think that it is the
lesser of two evils; in fact, I believe in many conservative values such as
the importance of integrity of the family, self-sufficiency, discipline,
etc.). Like you, I’d like to see us Asian Americans develop our own voice
and not have our issues defined for us! Oh how I long for the time when
Asian American Christians can get organized and stand in support of those of
us who are seminary educators. Then we can have something both positive and
critical to say to both our non-Christian Asian American activists and
mainstream society.

Tim

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 00:24:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: All Labels all that helpful?

Gary (my cool white dude bud):

Hey, you’ve got a point there! I got so fixated on the Pauline doctrinal
teachings that I forgot about both Jesus and Paul’s biographical data in the
N.T. Both were rather proud to be Jewish, weren’t they? Some historian I
turned out to be! On the other hand, don’t most Christians tend to celebrate
Jesus and Paul’s openness to and inclusivity of Gentiles? It seems that we
downplay their Jewishness. Good food for thought! – Tim

In a message dated 9/17/97 11:56:17 AM, gdot@juno.com wrote:

<>

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 00:58:49 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: Asian Americans Charge Fund-Raising Scandal Bias

Rev. Lew:

I really hoped to have heard some substantive discussion from the perspective
of politically conservative Asian American Christians… but in the spirit of
your recent post, I thought I’d repeat it with slightly modified editing.

In a message dated 9/16/97 10:59:41 PM, you wrote:

<>

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, so I hear. Some call it
whining, others say that the squeaky wheel gets the oil. But is the
alternative to remain silent when one is hurt or disenfranchised? What would
local churches be like if pastors dismissed their own members in this manner?
So, can we hear more substantive defenses for politically conservative
Christian perspectives?

In Christ,
Tim

— End —

Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 11:33:38 -0500
To: cac@bccn.org, acmi-network@xc.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: CAC_Mail: Volunteers needed, UCLA area church, PRC and in ABC ministries

VOLUNTEERS NEEDED –
UCLA AREA –
IN PRC MINISTRY
AND IN ABC MINISTRY

Does anyone feel called to spend a year as
a volunteer in a small, growing, spiritually-
oriented Chinese congregation, to help
this church grow its young English
congregation, and/or to help grow a
PRC outreach based in the church?

I serve as consultant to the Chinese
Bible Church of West Los Angeles,
one of a small number of Chinese
congregations in the UCLA vicinity.
This church, 22 years old, is largely made
up of UCLA undergrads, graduate students,
and alumni. Students are coming to know
the Lord and being baptized each year. The
church is mobile, given student population.
Mandarin/Cantonese worship, 11 am;
English worship, 2 pm.

The young English congregation (2 years old)
has potential to grow.

The church did have a PRC ministry, and two
years ago “gave/sent” their PRC people to a
church plant nearby. The church would now like
to re-start another PRC outreach.

We need volunteers to come help these two
ministries grow. Perhaps you can think in
terms of a one-year commitment as a
“missionary” from your church?

For further information, contact:

Samuel Ling
Consultant, Chinese Bible Church of West Los Angeles
(General Director, China Horizon)
16334 Fieldcrest Ct.
La Mirada, CA 90638

Office: China Horizon
1605 E. Elizabeth
Pasadena, CA 91104
Voicemail: 626-296-7615

Email: sling@chinahorizon

— End —

Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:39:16 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC , JLoFEC@aol.com
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Dear Rev. John Lo:

As a one-point-fiver, I always feel guilty about the way in which ABCs
are treated in predominatly OBC congregations. On the east coast, there
are relatively few career opportunities for ABC pastors, still fewer
senior positions. The current growth of Chinese churches (can’t speak
for churches of other ethnic groups) are mainly immigrant- and foreign
student-driven, which means we are doing a poor job reaching ABCs.

The problem you mentioned is alarming, I think. Can other ABC pastors,
church workers, seminarians speak on this?

Sze-kar

— End —

Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 17:24:28 -0500
To: cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: CAC_Mail: amen to Ken Fong et al — good mentors

I cannot agree more with Ken that:
Too little mentoring goes on in Anglo
institutions to groom future leaders
of color.
I had a wonderful mentor during my
years with the home missions board
of my denomination. My immediate
boss understood that it takes years
to network in the Chinese/Asian
community before Chinese/Asian
pastors would step up and apply to
our denomination to be church planters.
His boss did not (or if he did, his
major donor churches did not).
Result: my immediate boss (in
my interpretation) was shown the door.

Good news: my immediate boss,
8 years since we parted company,
is STILL tangibly encouraging and
supporting MY ministry!!!!!!

God needs just a few good servants!

Sam Ling

— End —

From: Ahlau@aol.com
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:55:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: wans@monet.bc.edu, cac@bccn.org, JLoFEC@aol.com
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Hi,

first time posting but I am an ABC pastor in Oakland, CA. over the last
several years I have heard of several english/ youth pastor kind of positions
in churches here in the bay area. churches that have a reasonable size englsh
speaking group are seeing the need for someone who can connect with them
better (often youth). though still “junior” positions, they are nevertheless
positions. but the lack of people that leads churches to hire non-Chinese
clergy/ staff says that the chinese community does not encourage its young
people into the vocation of ministry.

blessings,
anne lau
Chinese Community UMC

— End —

Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:27:23 -0700
From: “Stephen K. Leung”
To: gdot.juno.com@smtp3.erols.com
CC: CAC@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: My Boss is a Jewish….?

Brother Gary,
Thanks for the “Swedish message!” (Hope you’re not offended by that weak
attempt at humor.) My boss is a Jewish carpenter! So proclaims the
familiar bumper sticker. You raise good questions; i’m surprised nobody
has offered any comments in response. Maybe, nobody’s as impulsive as
yours truly.

Yes, Jesus does seem to set forth a “we” and “they” distinction in your
sited text from Matthew. However, i think we must ask for what purpose?
Rather than trying to find or reaffirm his own Jewishness, I believe he
was setting forth a very good model for those who wish to communicate
truth. No, Christ never denies being Jewish. But, i think his purpose
here was to identify with his audience and to speak with them in terms
they would readily recognize. His audience was Jewish! We see that
Christ sets apart the Pharisees, the tax collectors, and Gentiles as what
not to DO in this portion of the Sermon on the Mount.

The question then is why? Why “demonize” these groups? Is it just
because the Gentiles weren’t Jews? I could understand someone coming to
that conclusion. However, I would say that what it was about the
Gentiles that Jesus used to appeal to the indignation of his audience was
their beliefs or lack thereof. Some translations render them as pagans
instead of Gentiles. This would contrast his listeners to the Gentiles
in a manner analogous to how they were also being asked to understand
themselves as being different from tax collectors and Phaisees – the
“disgusting” people. Personally, i interpret Christ’s comments here to
not be malicious against certain “disdainful” groups nor to set up
Jewish, non-tax collecting, non-religious people as the only ones worthy
of the Kingdom and his revolutionary Kingdom ethics. Could we really
suggest that Jesus practiced the politics of hate or elitism?

What was he trying to get over to his audience? I think he was telling
the followers that they couldn’t settle for being just like the folks
they may have tended to mistrust and even loathe. Instead, particularly
with respect to love, they had to go beyond doing just what these
“others” did. John Stott in _The Message of the Sermon on the Mount_,
(not that he has the difinitive interpretation) in fact brings out that
Christ was actually insisting that his followers would have to get past
the revenge/recompense and the racialism forms of love that the “others”
practiced.

Love your enemies! Can’t find someone disagreeable to love? Try the one
who oppresses you, piously looks down upon you, wields power over you, or
doesn’t believe as you. And, if it really IS a Jewish thing – you
(Gentiles) wouldn’t understand, then try loving those racially different
from you – even if they don’t/won’t extend love outside of their racial
boundaries first. Is this an example of Jesus (positively or negatively)
playing the race card?

Well, my point here isn’t that the sermon was just about love. But, to
summarize, Jesus was bringing out the Gentile/Jewish difference as an
aide to his audience’s information processing and comprehension. After
all, that’s what culture helps us do. Paul who certainly didn’t deny
being Jewish and a Pharisee, also shared that he became all things to all
men for the purpose of communicating the truth that saves. Let’s pray we
use our understanding of identities (ours and others’) likewise.

In the Redeemer,
Stephen Leung

— End —

From: Jklumc@aol.com
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 08:03:38 -0400 (EDT)
To: wans@monet.bc.edu
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Dear Sze-kar:

There are many opportunities for ABC and OBC pastors in the United Methodist
Church. My associate was an African American woman UM pastor who ministered
in New York’s Chinatown from 1993 to 1996. After she was reappointed to an
African American UM church, we had a hard time filling the position as ABC UM
pastors were in short supply! UMC is open to
ministers-from-other-denominations (MOD).

In addition to pastoring the Chinese United Methodist Church, 69 Madison
Street, New York, NY 10002, I am also the Chairperson of the NCCAM (National
Committee on Chinese-American Ministries) of the UMC. The NCCAM’s sole
mission is to strengthen exisiting Chinese-congregations and develop new
faith communities/congregations within the UMC. To establish new faith
communities, we need a lot more ABC pastors and lay missioners.

For more information please contact at (212) 267-6464

Rev. Dr. James K. Law
Senior Pastor
Chinese United Methodist Church
email: JKLumc@aol.com

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: skleung@erols.com
Cc: CAC@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: My Boss is a Jewish….?
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 12:12:04 EDT

Hi Stephen,

You’re welcome. I feel welcome among the ‘sons’ of CAC because of letters
like yours. I too hope my jokes, etc. have not offended anyone; so far no
one has complained. CAC has been a great place to be myself; sometimes
better than Swedish-American family 🙂

About Jesus constructing a model for communicating truth, try it. To me
His Sermon words are blistering…

If you were to speak/communicate to other Chinese from the same type of
(truth) perspective that Jesus demonstrates toward his Jewish friends,
followers, audience, is there any doubt that non-Chinese people would be
greatly offended?
Particularly in Matthew, e.g read Ch. 23 for the most vicious speech
perhaps ever recorded, Jesus offends the World. Comparing, for example,
John 3:16, 17, it’s puzzling.

your Brother,

G

— End —

To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors
From: steveandwinnie@juno.com (Stephen N Wong)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 14:50:23 EDT

CACers,

The postings from Anne Lau and James Law not only indicate a shortage of
ABC pastors, but a shortage of attractive ministry positions. I would
think that the two are very much related. As Sze-kar points out, a lack
of ABCs in an educational enterprise is an anomaly. We seem to be
teaching our kids that God loves doctors more than preachers!

As a church planting pastor, I’m becoming more and more enamored of the
idea of encouraging young ABCs to think of planting churches as an
exciting and worthwhile career choice. This will require both
denominational support, in the form of infrastructure and finances, and
support from established pastors in Asian churches who can act as mentors
and sponsors. Can I hear an “amen”?!

Dios le bendiga,

Steve Wong

— End —

Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:53:05 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Dear CACers:

Recent postings by Anne Lau and James Law seem to indicate a real
shortage of ABC pastors, a problem I’ve noticed in mainline seminaries
(very few ABC students and fewer faculty members–surely an anomaly in
American education) and churches (often hiring non-Chinese staff
instead, when Chinese are more suitable). Perhaps CAC could begin to
address this issue in some systematic fashion as well. What do the
others think?

En Christo,
Sze-kar

PS: Will be out of town till Tuesday.

— End —

Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 16:08:19 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: Stephen N Wong
CC: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

steve and etc.

I agree that there is a dearth of ABC pastors. But suggesting that
planting new churches with most of them, while I can appreciate the
reasoning, may beg at least 3 very important questions:

1) if they’re just out of seminary, how prepared will they be to pastor
a church, let alone a brand new start up?

2) if this is based on the prevailing model of solo pastorates, most of
these fresh faces will be doomed to years of frustration, even lingering
feelings of failure, simply because the Spirit doesn’t ever give any one
person all the gifts needed to pastor a church. I’m not against
planting new churches, but I am beginning to question solo model, esp.
since I’ve been nurtured under the multi-model. How to do it? Not
sure. Would require a high degree of collaboration and investment from
several churches, denomination, etc.

3) if they’re going to plant churches, what paradigm of church will they
be using? my suspicion is that, too often, these ‘new’ churches are
mainly younger ABCs following the same blueprint for worship,
evangelism, etc., as the churches they don’t feel called to serve.

just food for thought,
ken fong

— End —

To: CAC@bccn.org
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 18:36:20 -0600
Subject: CAC_Mail: NEWS (2 FYI’s)
From: gdot@juno.com (G Ottoson)

FYI #1

In _The Denver Post_ (newspaper) today (9/19) appeared a very interesting
article by Cal Thomas about the confusing politics of the Christian
Right; ‘confusing’ in the sense that people have been distracted from the
_Kingdom of God_ by them. I tried unsuccessfully to locate Mr. Thomas’
article(s) on the web. The closest I got to an article was at this site:
http://www.heritage.com (or .org, can’t recall which now), which is password
protected. fyi, the following paragraph is from this site:

<<
[Cal Thomas'] twice-weekly column, distributed by the Los Angeles Times
Syndicate, appears in such newspapers as the New York Daily News, Boston
Globe, Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, Denver Post, Baltimore Sun,
Milwaukee Journal, Philadelphia Daily News, Houston Post, Washington
Times, Tampa Tribune, Detroit Free Press and St. Paul Pioneer Press &
Dispatch.
>>

FYI #2

Local article (I live near Denver, CO):

<>

G

— End —

From: Ahlau@aol.com
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:35:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

I agree with Stephen that until we deal with some of the issues of how ABC
ministries are treated in Chinese churches and the issues of money and
security (what nice, smart chinese kid would consider or be encouraged to be
a pastor!? what parent would want or let them?) then we are stuck where we
are. few ABC pastors, no value or serious consideration of this ministry, and
the need to strike out on our own for that to happen which may be what it
will be. who else could/ should serve this population except their own? we
need to make an effort to raise leaders to articulate and theologize for
themselves, not folks generations older or from another culture or place.

blessings, anne lau

— End —

Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:35:29 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors
From: darryl_fong@juno.com
X-From: darryl_fong@juno.com (darryl fong)

I echo Anne’s message regarding Chinese-American Pastors. The difficulty
I have experienced is the rapidly changing “culture” of the younger
ABC’s. When I was pastoring, I found that I had to litterally learn a
different sub-culture and then when I thought I understood it, it
changed!

Darryl Fong
darryl_fong@juno.com

— End —

Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:28:48 -0500
To: kenfong@earthlink.net, cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Has anyone heard of Robert
Goette’s attempt to mentor
Asian American, second
generation church planting
in Wheeling, Illinois? Anyone
benefited from him or other
sources of mentoring?

Sam Ling

— End —

Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 20:14:17 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: Samuel Ling
CC: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: Chinese-American Pastors

Sam,
I’ve heard of Goette’s efforts, have spoken with him, but I don’t know
how fruitful things have been.

ken.

— End —

From: “DJ Chuang”
To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 23:12:54 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: re: Chinese American Pastors

This is a great discussion that’s underway; I’ve been having mailer problems,
but here were my initial thoughts to John’s message about Chinese American
pastors.

John has rightly observed that there’s a considerable attrition rate for ABC
pastors; I have heard statistics as high as 66% (two-thirds) of ABC pastors
quit ministry within 18 months of starting. This is not just changing
churches, but quitting ministry all together. Those stats are alarming, and
unverified, but I would not be surprised if it were true. (but these stats
sure _feel_ true *grin*) I myself am new to ministry, and when I passed the
18-month milestone and still had faith in my God and toward ministry, it was
cause for rejoicing and celebration, I tell you!

>From one Chinese pastor’s opinion, he believes ABC pastors’ high attrition
rate is due to (1) lack of perseverance, (2) ABC’s lack respect in an ethnic
Chinese church, and (3) ABC’s have a 2nd career to fall back on. There are
certainly other factors; I myself am one that is moving on from an ethnic
Chinese church, having served here in Raleigh Chinese Christian Church for 2
years as youth pastor, but finding the ethics and process and values of the
church to be restrictive.

As one English pastor said to me, the Chinese church is more of a cultural
institution than a biblical one. I would add some other reasons: ABC’s are
not encouraged to enter ministry, so the number of ministers are not
proportional to the need; and the Chinese generation (which I believe are
responsible to reach the next generation, and at least be supportive of
them) are not upholding their leadership and mentoring role. But this is a
difficult diagnosis, for some may interpret this comment as a failure to
“show respect” to elders..

DJ

On 14 Sep 97 at 3:26, JLoFEC@aol.com wrote:

> My question is two-fold:
> (a) what has the drop-out rates for thirty-something ABC pastors been? What
> do you think have been the reasons for the drop-off? (b) how many
> twenty-something seminarians and young pastors are out there, and do they
> face the same circumstances? Should we expect the same kind of drop-off
> ratios, or has anything changed out there?

* * ICQ UIN 508675

— End —

From: ArtZech46@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 21:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Dear CACers,

As a 3rd generation ABC born in So. Cal let me share my perspective on the
issue of few ABC’s in the Chinese church. I grew up in an all white
neighborhood & attended an all white church until seminary. I felt the call
to ministry in 1977 before I entered college. At that time I was unaware of
the needs in the Chinese church or ABC ministry. It was only after I met
Wayland Wong from Chinese Presbyterian church in Orange County did I know
this need in the Christian church. Eventually I interned under him. I
entered seminary with the original intent of becoming a missionary in Asia,
etc. In college I studied Mandarin for 2 years and even went to China for
several months to learn the language.

I have “survived” ministering as an ABC in an immigrant church for the past
10 years, but not without a lot of difficulties & wounds. How have I
“survived” and continue to stay in a difficult place of ministry. Several
reasons.

1) Knowing My Call.
Ministry in the church in general is difficult. If you read literature on
ministers in North America or have read Barna’s book, “Pastor’s Today,” you
will find that those men & women called to pastoral ministry have a tough
job. It is not limited to Chinese churches. I think someone said the
average pastor in the So. Baptist convention lasts about 1.5 years at a
church. (correct me if I am wrong) There have been numerous times I have
wanted to quit ministry. At one time my wife even told me to go teach or
something else. But I have been convinced that God has called me to be a
pastor. So I have determined I will not quit.

I think some young ministers and even some in the middle age bracket (I
myself am approaching 40) may question their calling. I think seminaries are
often taking students because of the need to get bodies to pay tuition and
not because they have a calling to ministry. Just my opinion.

2) Carrying the Cross.
Jesus says that being a disciple of his will require self denial & suffering.
In Luke 9:23-24. “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and
take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life
will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it.”

In ministry the disciples and early church experienced suffering &
persecution. Remember your church history of the persecutions. So, why do
we have a hard time when we suffer in the Chinese church? Shouldn’t we
expect it to come? When I was fresh out of seminary I naively expected the
church to be a wonderful & great place to work. In my first position of a
small Chinese church as the youth pastor it split after 6 months. (Not
related to my ministry) I was upset with God because I felt he had sent me
to a horrible place. I blamed him for the pain I experienced. But It wasn’t
God’s fault. It was people.

I myself as an ABC am not ready to take up suffering & pain as a part of
ministry. Especially if it is from the church. So, I have learned to deal
with suffering in the ministry and develop a tougher skin. Do I still get
hurt. Yes I do. I have just learned how to cope with it better.

In Chinese church theology the general thought is that the more you suffer
the more spiritual you are. The heros of the faith are those who have paid a
great cost personally to follow God. Read about Wang Ming Dao or Watchman
Nee. I don’t know if there is a way to prepare people to expect suffering in
ministry but often you will have it in the Chinese church, or in any church
in general.

3) Missionary Cross-cultural Sensitivity.
I think that ABC’s have a great difficulty in understanding the Chinese way
of thinking. At Fuller seminary I had classes on cultural anthropology and
on ministry in the Chinese Church by Hoover Wong. Yet what I learned in the
classroom did not prepare me for the real life conflicts I experienced in the
Chinese church. Experience is the best teacher, but it can be a pretty harsh
one too.

For the longest time I was irritated by the way things were done in a Chinese
church. I said to myself. “We are in America, not China, Taiwan, Hong Kong,
so why are we doing it this way?” But I have come to realize I cannot change
3,000 years of Chinese culture. So my solution is to view myself as a
missionary on American soil. I have to operate & think as a missionary. I
know some ABCs might say that this is a bit extreme. That they are called to
pastor, but not to be a missionary.

Paul says in 1 Cor 9:19-23 19 Though I am free and belong to no man, I make
myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20 To the Jews I
became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one
under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those
under the law. 21 To those not having the law I became like one not having
the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so
as to win those not having the law. 22 To the weak I became weak, to win the
weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I
might save some. 23 I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may
share in its blessings.

For myself, I feel called to reach the ABCs. So I may have to become more
sensitive to “Chinese” issues in order to minister and reach those in the
Chinese church. In regards to this mentality I have spoken with missionaries
who agree with my perspective. That is maybe why some Chinese churches hire
non-asian missionaries as English ministers. These people have had training
in cross-cultural sensitivity, etc.

4) Understanding the Chinese church.
Churches are complicated. Chinese churches are even more complicated. One
must understand the history of the Chinese church in China & in North
America. Why? Chinese churches carry a lot of cultural baggage from the
past. The reason a Chinese church may act a certain way is probably because
of what they were doing in Taiwan, Hong Kong, etc. (Where the OBC pastor was
influenced & trained) An ABC must understand Chinese church theology. Read
Watchman Nee & you will understand Chinese church theology.

5) Humility, Humility, Humility & Patience.
It is one thing to say to God you will be his “bond-slave.” It is another to
be treated like it by the church. I don’t like being treated like a slave.
But in the Chinese church you may be treated that way. High demands, low
pay, long hours. But I still think my job is easier than some of my friends
who are missionaries in remote places. So, are we producing men & women who
will be servants and will be treated like servants?

An ABC will 99% of the time be # 2 or #3 on the totem pole. I don’t ever
expect to be Sr. in my role. And that is fine. I have been there & done
that. I need to accept my role in the church and deal with my own attitudes
of why people don’t do things my way.

I am learning that leadership is influence, not position. (Read John
Maxwell). So, I am learning to lead in the church from a #3 position. It is
a challenge. But I have been able to influence my church elders, etc. It
takes time & patience.

6) Character, Age & Perseverance.
Fact of life. If you are starting fresh out of seminary with no gray hair,
wife, or children, you may not get a lot of respect in the Chinese church.
We must not let people look down on us because of our youth but set an
example in character. In my younger days in ministry I acted immaturely when
I did not get my way. (e.g. gossip, pout, point fingers, become impatient,
etc.) Too often I blamed others for the problems in the church without
examining myself first. I think us ABC’s have a lot of baggage to deal with
before we enter into ministry. Understanding the dysfunctions of an Asian
home, etc. would help the person in ministry. Over 10 years I have had to go
through personal counseling and tests to understand myself better as a
person. It has helped me to be a better Christian & minister. We need to
help younger ministers know themselves.

7) Vision.
Without a vision or passion, the minister will perish. Having a vision &
sticking to it takes more than seminary or training. It is something that
comes from the gut. For myself I need to have vision & passion to stay in a
challenging ministry. A vision to see the ABCs in my church become men &
women of God. A vision to train up the next generation of youth to serve
God. A vision to see God’s purpose’s achieved in spite of an imperfect
church. It may take me a lifetime to see my vision fulfilled, but I will
stick to it. We need to help ABCs have a vision. Believe me, the devil &
sometimes men will convince you just to survive in ministry. I plan to
thrive.

In conclusion, some may say that this is a lot to know & do if you are to
minister and thrive in the Chinese church. It is because it is a tough job.
For me it has never been easy. I think we need to help people understand
the immensity of the task. At least they can know what to expect.

Sorry that this is a long essay. But it has been in me for about 10 years.
I hope that this may offer encouragement and assistance to some of us out
there trying to minister to this unique people group in a unique church.

For the Kingdom,
Rev. Arthur Lum
Chinese Church in Christ
San Jose, CA

— End —

To: cac@bccn.org
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 19:22:01 -0700
Subject: CAC_Mail: IGNORE THIS TEST!
From: ed.law@juno.com (Edmund K Law)

Ahhh! I knew you could’t resist.

Thank you fellow CACers for some very interesting cyber-discussions. I
have been lurking on CAC mail for many months. At first, the posts were
infrequent and sedate (“typical Asian,” I thought). But ever since Asian
PK, this group has been quite lively and provocative. So provocative,
that like Elihu of old (Job 32), I can barely restrain myself from
contributing my half-baked ideas. 🙂

But first…a test of e-mail technology. All systems go?

Grace and Peace

Ed Law
Sacramento

— End —

From: HarryWLew@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 01:51:29 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Are Labels all that helpful?

Dear CACers,

I’m sorry for only now responding to posts from last week, but this is the
busiest time of the year for campus ministers.

My pointing out that most of the POLITICAL posts on this mailing list is of a
LIBERAL persuasion comes from the number of times I’ve read Tim Tseng and one
or two others use the terms “ultra-conservative,” “right-wing agenda,”
“religious right,” and “right-wingers”– terms that carry a negative
connotation.

I know that this is not a necessarily liberal mailing list. I was pleasantly
surprised by the half-dozen or so messages appreciative of my posts against
affirmative action and the whining of the AA Friends of Bill and Hillary. But
I would have preferred that those of you who sent them, did it publicly
through the mailing list, rather than sending them to me privately.

It’s not very Asian-American to stick our necks out. But then didn’t Richard
Nixon once say of Americans as a whole that “the silent majority is
conservative”?

Yours in Christ,
Harry Lew

— End —

From: HarryWLew@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 01:51:18 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Dear Steve,

You said, “We seem to be teaching our kids that God loves doctors more than
preachers!”

How true! As a campus minister, I often hear Chinese-American students tell
me that they would love to go into the ministry, but their parents would
throw a fit if they depart from the traditional medical or engineering career
route.

I could understand it if their parents were nonbelievers, but many times
their folks are professing Christians and church members. That’s really sad.

My Korean-American students don’t seem face the same kind of discouragement
from their parents. Are Koreans more likely than we Chinese to regard the
ministry as a worthy calling and profession?

Yours in Christ,
Rev. Harry Lew

— End —

From: Rlfong@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 02:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: ArtZech46@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

CACers

hear hear for what Arthur and Steve and Ken are saying. as a lay elder, I
truly appreciate the trials and truths of fire they have walked in the
chinese church in america. To be an ABC pastor is truly a rough calling.

Ronnie Fong
Fremont, California ( SF Bay Area )

P.S. how about typically signing off with our location, to help lend
perspective on where we are residing / coming from.

In a message dated 97-09-22 00:52:59 EDT, ArtZech46@aol.com writes:

<>

— End —

From: Rlfong@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 02:24:09 -0400 (EDT)
To: HarryWLew@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

In a message dated 97-09-22 02:02:24 EDT, HarryWLew@aol.com writes:

<>

It’s my understanding that in Korea, Christianity has penetrated the culture
to such an extent that when a son expresses a calling to be a pastor, the
parents are delighted because it is considered “prestigious” even the parents
are not Christians.

Ron Fong
Fremont, CA ( SF Bay Area )

— End —

Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:49:03 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: ArtZech46@aol.com
CC: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Nice to hear from you, Art! Was wondering where you ended up after
leaving Branches in Rosemead.

Wow, you shared a mouthful. Thanks for the honest, earnest musings.
They definitely have the ring of wisdom that comes with age and time…
and untold scars.

I want to say, first, may the Lord God bless your efforts, Art, and
anyone else out there who has been clearly called to reach ABCs by
serving/operating WITHIN the paradigm of the OBC churches. I’m sure
that, for many of the ABC laypeople struggling to find a good fit at
these churches, having ABC pastors who are willing to suffer and serve,
at great personal cost, is truly a blessing.

My story, now more than 20 years old (yikes!), took a different turn
than yours. I grew up NEVER wanting to be an ABC pastor. Years later,
when I finally felt Him leading me to enter seminary, OBC pastor after
OBC pastor told me that same thing: unless you learn how to speak
Chinese, you’re always going to be JUST a youth pastor! Even one of my
then ABC benefactors, Rev. Dr. James Chuck from SF, kept after me to
take private Cantonese lessons like he did for 10 years. I respectfully
told Dr. Chuck that, since his church was smack in the middle of SF
C’town, it made total sense for him to have to speak Chinese. But even
though we both spoke English, my way of thinking and speaking would
appeal much more naturally to ABCs who never set foot in C’town more
than once or twice a year. Different calling, different requirements.
You see, all the advice I was getting was for me to become MORE CHINESE
than God had made me. I know, I know, there’s the argument about being
all things to all people in order to save some, to be like a missionary,
but I still firmly believe that becoming MORE CHINESE than God made me
is taking me in the OPPOSITE direction of reaching the more americanized
ABCs and AsiAms in general. Does that make sense? In other words, by
the time I or anyone wins the blessing of the OBCs for being so
Chinesey, maybe it’s at the selfsame moment that we’ve lost our
God-given, innate ability to reach this expanding segment of more
acculturated ABCs. If anything, I think it mades more sense
evangelistically and demographically to contextualize myself in the
direction of the targeted unreached people group, in this case,
westernized ABCs and AsiAms.

Of course, there’s a built in problem with this plan, right? If I
become more americanized to reach the more americanized, then I won’t
fit in in most OBC churches, correct? But this is a losing battle to
begin with, imho, because it’s HIGHLY doubtful that these ABC unchurched
seekers would be naturally into the culture of an OBC church. What’s my
point? Simply this: imho, most who are truly called to reach more
americanized ABCs will not be able to accomplish this through the
paradigm of the OBC church. For the above 2 reasons: you either won’t
be embraced by them because you’re TOO Chinese -and/or- even if you
reach them, most probably won’t dig joining a predominantly OBC church.
Am I wrong or am I right?

One big exception to my theory: if you’re fundamentally called to reach
the ABC offspring of the OBC church folk. That’s different. But let’s
be crystal clear: making sure the church-born ABCs don’t leave someday
is definitely reaching out to never-churched, newly skeptical AsiAms.

To really reach these unreached folk, we must plant new churches and/or
renew existing JA ones whose Issei pop. has passed on and are waiting
for a new twist. I know, planting new ABC churches isn’t a new or novel
idea. Many have tried. Many are struggling. One of these days I’ll
share what the Lord has been teaching me/us lately about creating a
multi-Asian/multi-ethnic ministry, which is what the Lord is doing at
Evergreen Baptist Church of LA right now. The irony of our new
situation is not lost on me: here I am, for years stating that there’s
no future for a multi-generational AsiAm church and we’ve become a
church with both growing numbers of americanized AsiAms AND growing
numbers of OBAsians, esp. from South Asia now. And a growing number of
non-Asians. The difference? Our church is staffed and led by primarily
3rd gen./sansei, very americanized AsiAms.

Didn’t mean for this to be such a discourse. But Art’s email prompted
me to blurt this stuff out. So I guess you can blame him. 😉

later. ken fong.

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 00:02:25 -0700
From: Ken Fong
To: HarryWLew@aol.com
CC: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Several years ago, a Korean-Am. seminary student told me the following
story: “When I was getting ready to go off to college, my father, a
nonbeliever, pulled me aside and said ‘Son, if you want to make me and
your mother proud then you become a doctor, a lawyer, a cpa, or a
pastor.'”

I’ve been passing that little gem along since then as a way of
illustrating the difference between the encouragement that our KA
brethren receive re. pastoral ministry and the kind that many of us ABCs
get.

Recently, however, my KA pastor friends told me that that attitude is
changing. A growing number of KA parents, even Christian ones, are
discouraging their kids from being pastors because that role/job now is
starting to fall into disrespect (America) and not be as well
compensated as before.

In my own case, my dad (then not a believer) was against it but my
Christian mom was all for it, even in the face of her shaming female
friends. God used my mom’s blessing to take me a long way.

ken fong.

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 00:12:00 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: Rlfong@aol.com
CC: ArtZech46@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Ron,

thanks for the words of encouragement. 20 years ago, when I kept
hearing the same advice from OBC pastors (“Learn to speak Chinese or
die!”…ok, they didn’t say “die” but that’s what it sounded like in
those days…a death sentence), it suddenly hit me. So long as I agreed
to play in their ‘game,’ then I had to play by their ‘rules.’ That was
fair. But, being a rebel back then and feeling so strongly about my
calling to reach more westernized AsiAms, I decided that I wouldn’t have
to play by their ‘rules’ if I wasn’t playing their ‘game.’ With God’s
grace and mercy, I and others would start a NEW game where who God had
made us essentially to be wasn’t a liability, wasn’t something to be
repressed, but was a great ASSET and was to be EXPRESSED.

By definition, a paradigm shift only happens when the rules change.
Without changing the essential rules, it could be just rearranging the
deck chairs on the Titanic! I don’t mean to sound perjorative about the
OBC churches. It’s very late and I’m running out of mental energy. So
please forgive me if my metaphors or analogies are a bit crude. No harm
intended.

g’nite,
ken fong
just outside of Los Angeles, CA

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 02:18:45 -0500
To: “DJ Chuang” , cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: CAC_Mail: On “cultural institutions”

I certainly agree with DJ’s (and all of our) critique
of the Chinese church’s failure to mentor/encourage
ABC’s into the ministry.

I would like to suggest that, though the Chinese
church IS a cultural institution rather than one
fully faithful to the Bible, it is important to
also realize that we as Chinese-Americans and
Asian Americans (ABCs, ARCs, 1.5ers, 2.0er, etc.)
also bring our culture/subculture into our
thinking. And our culture/subculture is
not necessarily biblical, nor American,
nor even purely Asian/Chinese-American,
but a combination of all these.

Chinese church leaders are not purely Chinese
in their decision making/responses. They respond
to situations with a combination/mixture of biblical,
Chinese, American, Chinese-American presuppositions.
And most people don’t realize which combination
they use, at any split-second!

DJ, I am not picking on your choice of words, but
I guess I always have my missiological antennae up
when I hear AA’s talk about the ethnic church
as a cultural institution. Perhaps it’s just semantics;
I am pleading for a cross-cultural dialogue where
the Bible remains ultimate authority, and we dialogue
across cultures and subcultures. Tough task; most
of the time, it’s pure delight, too!

Suggestion: How about getting some other OBC’s
(in addition to me) involved in this ongoing conversation?
How about printing out some of the email pieces which
have appeared in recent weeks, and sharing them with
our OBC leadership (perhaps omitting the authors’ names)?

Sam Ling

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 02:31:58 -0500
To: Rlfong@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Amen amen! Thanks Arthur
for your mature essay. It adds
to our already stimulating
discussion.

Sam Ling
China Horizon
La Mirada/Pasadena, CA

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 02:50:46 -0500
To: HarryWLew@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: CAC_Mail: Hist. Bkgd. of Stature of Chinese Pastors

Dear Harry,

As a pastor’s son, I have felt it was more
important to be a doctor (or to hold a
Ph.D., which I do), than to be a pastor.
The image of the pastor is still lowly,
among Chinese Christians and non-
Christians.

I understand that in Korean society, the
status/stature of ministers have risen
steadily in the past decades. What about
the Chinese pastor? Although it has
not been lowered, it is still quite low
in the eyes of Chiense business and
professional people. And the cultural
gap between OBCs who think this way,
and AA leaders (judging by the CAC
discussions posted recently), may be
widening. Anyone want to challenge me
on this assessment? I sincerely hope
I am wrong!!!

Years ago I read an article by Jonathan
Chao on Chinese church development
from the 19th to the 20th century in a
festschrift honoring Dr. Philip Teng
published by the China Grad School
of Theology in Hong Kong
(alas, it is in Chinese), in which Jonathan
pointed out that:

Missionaries in the 19th century hired
a good number of their early converts as
pastors — understandably, especially as
these Christians were evicted/ostracized
from their clans, and were often the only
recruits available for the ordained ministry!

These early Chinese pastors (1870’s 1880s etc.)
were paid 5 to 10% of the missionary’s
support package. Thus was begun the tradition
of Chinese pastors’ being underpaid.

(Tim Tseng, do I have my historical
facts right?)

I realize that pay isn’t everything, but
it IS a factor in shaping a minister’s image
in his societal context.

(Perhaps Fenggang Yang wants to chime
in here, or anyone else…)

Add to this the fact that Buddhist monks
beg for a living (it’s their CALLING to beg),
and you have a tradition of keep them poor,
keep them humble.

There is also a difference among denominations
re. pastors’ pay, and therefore church members’
view of the pastor. For example, for decades
the Episcopalians paid their pastors the highest
salaries.

The pastor’s image as lowly and thereore
lowly-paid is not an easy concept to change in the minds
of Chinese. How we need to heed Arthur Lum’s
advice to stay humble, carry our cross, remember
our calling, etc.

Just a historical note to share with you brothers
and sisters out there in CAC-land.

– – –

Response/echo to Arthur Lum’s remarks:

I am an OBC and came to the US at age
14 (in 1965). I have been very idealistic and
enthusiastic as a youth director (1976-78),
acting pastor (1978-79), church planter
(1980-85), senior pastor of a Chinese
church of 1000 people and 9 worshipping
congregations (1992-95), and adjunct prof
in American seminaries teaching on
Chinese/Chinese-American church
history (1980-present). None of
the above was easy — whether as unnoticed
in the trenches, or in the boardroom of a
major institution. Or advocating for the Chinese
church among non-Chinese. Just about everywhere I
went, I have been bruised. I, also, have
been healed by our loving Savior and
High Priest…!

I am learning to persevere as God’s
bond-slave by His grace. Many times I
have felt discouraged, felt like quitting,
and felt so very, very inadequate. I had to
look inside and deal with insecurity and an
inferiority complex.

God has been gracious.
He is still working with me. I have found
that the key is: accepting God’s love in Christ,
and ministering out of a heart which has
thus been liberated. Perhaps this is
synonymous with Arthur’s reminder to
re-kindle our sense of “calling.”

I have felt the “calling” (maybe too strong a
word; I think not) to be an advocate for
AA/C-A ministries among OBC leaders.
Anyone want to assign me to do
something in this regard?

Sam Ling
China Horizon
La Mirada/Pasadena, CA

(Harry: Long time no see, since
bookstore days at RES Phila.,
circa 1976, do I remember correctly?)

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 02:58:13 -0500
To: kenfong@earthlink.net, cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Ken,
Thanks for pointing out how
ABC pastors become very
acculturated in the OBC milieu
after their attempt to be
servant-like, etc., and thus
distanced from the very ABCs
and AsAms they are trying to
reach. This point needs to be
heard by OBC’s more often.

In Christ,
Sam Ling
La Mirada, CA

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 03:06:25 -0500
To: kenfong@earthlink.net, cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

My turn for authobiographical blurp:

My dad and mom were teachers in a Bible college
in Hong Kong (where one doesn’t drink, smoke,
dance, play mahjong or poker, or go to the movies).
They dedicated me to be used of God. But my
deceased father seemed a lot more proud when
I got my PhD than of the fact that I entered the
ministry.

Reason: My grandfather, an Anglican parson in
China, had 5 children(my father was #4 son). When
the Sino-Japanese war broke out in China in 1937,
the bishop told all the minsiters to find a tentmaking
occupation to support themselves. Thus my father
had always wanted to be a free-lance preacher
(Mandarin: zi yu chuan dao). He ended up majoring
in education at St. John’s University in Shanghai
(Anglican; BA 1943), and teaching in Bible colleges
in Hangzhou, China and in Hong Kong (Bethel
Seminary, 1948-1957, 1959-64)–and I was born
into the latter. My dad did become a pastor eventually
(Philadelphia Chinatown, 1967-81, until he died).

In that little Bible college I saw how the students prayed,
read their Bibles and did direct evangelism. In retrospect,
I saw that they were disadvantaged because they did
not receive strong training in (a) English or any western
language; (b) liberal arts; and (c) theology as we know it
in the west. That was the 1950’s, and Bethel was the
premier Bible college in Hong Kong at that time. Dozens
of OBC pastors now in North America were among the alumni.

I saw my dad’s students (i.e. my Sunday School teachers)
pray earnestly for their Sunday School students; take us to
public housing projects to do Sunday School on Sunday
afternoons to less privileged kids (the stench in the stairwells
is still fresh in my memory, 32 years later!), etc.

I am proud of being a son of the fundamentalist tradition.
I am not proud of the lack of respect which many fundamentalists
owe their pastors. I am grateful that, despite all its weaknesses,
the Chinese church does INTEND to love and honor her Lord.

Sam Ling
La Mirada, CA

— End —

From: “Ray Downen”
Organization: Mission Outreach (Joplin)
To: cac@bccn.org
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 10:01:43 +0000
Subject: CAC_Mail: Politics

Harry Lew is political. I share his political views. I figure
every Christian should. Yet every saint must think for him/her
self, and then speak as that person feels led by the Lord to do.
To speak disrespectfully of one who occupies high office in
our land is distasteful to me and likely to us all. It’s good if
we can commend those GOOD things that are done, however
unusual they may be, rather than speak negatively as it is so
easy sometimes to do.
It would also be good if we are sharing things about God
and the Christ if we try to avoid convincing others to share
our political views. Was Jesus interested in politics? Does He
call us to preach the gospel or to change political structures?
Let’s do what we’re called TO do. — Ray Downen in Joplin MO.

from Ray Downen respectfully on this day of the Lord.
417/782-0814 2228 Porter Joplin Mission Outreach.
Mail address is P O Box 1065 Joplin MO 64802-1065.
Internet home page addr = http://www.ipa.net/~outreach

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: outreach@ipa.net, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Politics
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:18:44 EDT

Dear Ray:

A couple of other issues for you. First, may I make a suggestion? Please
think through what you wrote (below), re-posing your questions to
yourself. By ascribing to Harry Lew’s views are you 1) proposing to
change the political structure of US Fed govt.; 2) is this what you and
Harry are called to do; 3) and, if Jesus was uninterested in politics,
why are you interested in them?

Second, I think Tim effectively (helpfully) pointed out the subtle
reversal of meanings in labels ‘Conservative’ and ‘Liberal’, the idea in
part being to encourage us look beneath, to examine political maneuvering
for what they are (e.g Clinton-esque corruption of power,
Gingrich-esque aspirations, via the right wing, to the same power which
corrupts). Tim said forthrightly that his current political bag is mixed
to a degree, esp, as I recall, in terms of opposing facets of big
govt/supporting some tax cut proposals. It sounded sincere to me and got
me to think through my Scandinavian approach to govt. BTW, Did
you/anybody see the segment by _60 Minutes_ lat night on Norway? How
about this week’s Business Week re: the call for change to capitalist
style economics in China? What’s wrong with what they’ve got? Any
feedback on these stories?

G

On Mon, 22 Sep 1997 10:01:43 +0000 “Ray Downen”
writes:
>Harry Lew is political. I share his political views…Was Jesus
interested in >politics? Does Hecall us to preach the gospel or to change
political structures?
>Let’s do what we’re called TO do. — Ray Downen in Joplin MO.

— End —

From: GAPang@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:54:01 -0400 (EDT)
To: HarryWLew@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Take heart young ABC’s (C-A pastors)

In a message dated 97-09-22 01:53:33 EDT, HarryWLew@aol.com writes:

<>

Dear Rev. Lew,

I was one of those Chinese American students who felt called to go into the
ministry. For me it wasn’t being a doctor or engineer – it was going to law
school (but the same idea). I still remember the day I sat down in the
living room of my parents’ house and told them that I was going to the
mission field.

They wept, I wept, they shared their “disappointment” (which for most ABC’s
is far worse than anger) and their sense of wondering why they spent all that
“good money” on my private education.

After countless hours on my knees and many prayers from hundreds of faithful
“warriors”, nine years later my parents have begun regularly attending the
multi-racial church which I now pastor. God works in His time (I have
friends from the mission field who are still praying for parents after 15
years or more).

God is still working in my parents’ hearts. But I knew that one day I would
have to stand before our Lord, and being true to Him has been a decision that
I have never regretted (faced many trials with, but never regretted).

Encourage your young people to be true to the Lord, but to search their
hearts to make sure that they aren’t going into ministry out of rebellion or
to prove anything to anybody (these I feel are major contributors to burn
out, frustration, and unhappiness in ministry)

Hope you are encouraged by this testimony of our Lord’s faithfulness and
continue to encourage our young people to be faithful to God’s calling on
their lives (that includes some being doctors and engineers too! 🙂

Being in full time vocational ministry doesn’t always provide the best pay –
but the benefits are out of this world (quite literally)!

Joyfully serving the Master,

Garrick J. Pang
Wellspring Christian Church
Bellevue, Washington

— End —

To: cac@bccn.org
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:47:44 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: Adding One’s Name and Address
From: drwong1@juno.com (Richard Wong)

How about adding the church you attend or pastor, so that we can
appreciate the diversity of the contributiors?

(it might also be useful to know where these Chinese churches are located
so that we can drop in on a service if we’re ever on the road on a
Sunday!)

Richard L. Wong
Arlington, VA
Chinese Christian Church of Greater Washington DC

P.S. Our church’s website is located at
http://www.idsonline.com/gwccn/cccgw/

P.P.S. There’s a listing of Chinese churches in the Washington DC area at
http://www.idsonline.com/gwccn/ch_index.html.

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:33:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Lin
To: GAPang@aol.com
cc: HarryWLew@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Take heart young ABC’s (C-A pastors)

Thanks for the encouragement.

Some of you know my story…choosing full-time ministry and now going
on my 4th year of a severed relationship with my parents, who are not
speaking to me at this time. stories like yours give me hope and
encourage me to wait on the Lord. Thanks!

Being in asian american campus ministry, i have heart-to-hearts with
100’s of korean americans…overall, it ain’t much easier for them in
their personal relationships with their parents, although admittedly,
acceptance and affirmation in the korean community is much higher.

waiting on the Lord,
Tom Lin
(IVCF Staff, “Losing Face, Finding Grace” author)

— End —

To: cac@bccn.org
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:19:23 -0500
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Politics
From: drwong1@juno.com (Richard Wong)

Instead of challenging contributors to this list and putting them on the
defensive, I think it would be far more constructive to share one’s
personal views and to say how you got there, with the intention of
helping others to understand and appreciate an alternative point of
view, and maybe even to incorporate them into our own world view. It’s
not very encouraging to have one’s views challenged in a public forum.

Personally, I don’t view Christianity and politics as incompatible. We
are members of this polity called the United States. God has placed each
one of us under this form of government, rather than under some other
form of government (like under the Red Chinese banner, for example). If
God has put you someplace, He allows you the freedom to fully partake of
your rights as a citizen. For example, Paul exercised his rights as a
Roman citizen, while simultaneously retaining his identity as a Jew and
as a follower of Christ. Similarly, we too can exercise our rights —
the right to vote, the right to freely worship, the right to express
one’s opinion, and the right to petition government for the redress of
greivances — without compromising our identities as Asian Christians.

I feel I have not just a right, but a duty to express my views as part of
my Christian Asian-American identity. If some of my views happen to
correspond with a particular political belief or coincide with a
particular party’s philosophy, it follows as a result of my personal
identity, not from a desire to be identified with any particular
political movement.
Moreover, as members of this polity, we are called upon to pay taxes and
to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. As Christians, we are also
called upon to be responsible stewards of our resources. When those
resources are involuntarily tithed to the state in the form of taxes, we
have not relinquished our stewardship over those funds. Instead, we
still have the ability to direct this government in its trusteeship over
those funds. Whether the funds are used to support blasphemous artwork,
or to fund the deaths of prenatal infants in military and government-run
hospitals, or to build homes and shelter for the poor, is up to the body
politic to decide, and as members of that body, we have a right, if not a
duty, to speak out.

Just my two cents.

Richard L. Wong
Arlington, VA
Chinese Christian Church of Greater Washington DC

P.S. Gdot — my thoughts about Scandanavia will be in my next message.

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 16:29:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: CAC@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS (2 FYI’s)

Gary:

I read that editorial in the Rochester daily and actually found it quite
interesting! I don’t agree with many of Thomas’ political statements, but
this editorial seemed to me to be on target. My own “political” statements,
notwithstanding, I believe as Thomas stated, that we must be wary of
“confusing” our mission to be Christ’s body with the political process. –
Tim

In a message dated 9/19/97 5:41:24 PM, gdot@juno.com wrote:

<>

— End —

From: “Cheuk, Clarence”
Organization: Wheaton College
To: cac@bccn.org, “Ray Downen”
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 20:48:47 CST6CDT
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Politics

Hi. I would like to respond to Ray Downen’s
message. But in order to do so, I feel compelled to preface my
response in an Asian-y way. So here goes…I would like to note
that I am still young and a bit naive (I’m only a third-year
undergrad), so whatever I say, I say it with humility and respect.

I feel that the call to abandon political concerns
when discussing spiritual matters sets up a dichotomy that was never
meant to be established. Part (a large part in my opinion) of our
evangelism efforts involve social changes on a macro level.
Otherwise, we run into some kind of evangelism paradox: the more we
try to “just preach the Word,” the less favorably people will respond
to it. I believe that the collective advocation of certain macro-
social changes by a Christian body can do wonders for evangelism
efforts.
For example, take the issue of racism.
During the Civil Rights Movement, the Evangelical churches were
curiously silent. It was too politically touchy for them to get
involved. What an impact they would have had it they had gotten not
only more involved, but rose as a leader to defend the rights of the
oppressed! Christianity in America would be entirely different if
that had been the case.
Of course, wisdom and tact should be used when
talking about political issues; we should never let them overwhealm
us. But sometimes, political issues are not just political issues.
Their implications dive into the pool of theological truths (e.g.
issues of social justice). Therefore, they are worth our time, and
the discussion thereof is valuable even (especially!) in a Christian
context.
I end this response the same way I began it —
Asian-y. I would just like to say that I could very well be wrong.
I’m young; I still have years of education ahead of me. So who
knows?

— End —

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 15:05:10 -0700
To: cac@bccn.org
From: Tom Steers
Subject: CAC_Mail: recent dialogues

Thanks to John Lo for starting up the present discussion…

Here are a couple of thoughts that are in my heart after the last couple of
decades of God’s School of Learning in “ABC” and “Asian American”
ministries…

1. The need to have “both-and” thinking rather than “either-or” thinking.
In relationship to the ABC/OBC reality, it’s my experience that there are
many paradigms Chinese American Christians have in regards to their
ethnicity and how it works out in their church life. For example,
1. OBC who only wants OBC church
2. OBC who can be in either OBC or ABC church
3. OBC who prefers ABC church
4. OBC who prefers an Asian American church
5. OBC who prefers a multicultural church
6. OBC who prefers an European American church
7. OBC who prefers any other church (e.g. Japanese, Korean, Hispanic, etc.)
8. ABC who prefers an OBC church
9. ABC who prefers one OBC/ABC church with translation in English
10 ABC who prefers parallel OBC/ABC ministries in a church
11.ABC who prefers a separate ABC church
12.ABC who prefers an Asian American church
13.ABC who prefers a multicultural church
14.ABC who prefers an European American church
15.ABC who prefers any other church of another culture
What is interesting is how people change from one to another these days.
There’s a lot of movement. Or, should I say, “dyno-movement!” In the
“old” days there weren’t as many options. Regardless, my point here is
that ALL are valid. ALL need to be respected as options. ALL paradigms
need vital ministries to bring OBCs and ABCs into maturity in Christ.

Thank God for all OBC-ABC possibilities. Thank God for those who persevere
in parallel ministries who serve The King. Thank God for the exciting, new
ministries who have their unique purposes and problems. It’s not one, or
the other, but all (“both-and”). Thank God for meeting the needs of people
in each different paradigm. And thank God for the laborers He has raised
up for each paradigm (and will definitely continue to raise up!). Thank
God for all the new possibilities so that the 90% who are not in the
Kingdom or church can get in via many new ways.

#2. At this time in history, I believe The God of Hope is speaking MUCH
HOPE into all Asian American Christian leaders. Rom 15:13. Hope is an
incredible quality to possess since it is inseparable from faith, prayer,
vision, and victories in Christ. Having hope helps us wield strongly the
Sword of the Spirit in prayer and in preaching. And, if leaders have hope,
the congregation will, too.

Reasons for hope:

1. As mentioned above, there are unprecedented alternatives for ministry.
It’s not just ABC’s pastors needing to serve their initial “entry” time in
OBC churches. There are so many other kinds of churches and para church
ministries. WHAT VOCATIONAL HOPE!

2. God gave me a verse some years ago that gave me MUCH HOPE for
generational healing, deliverance, and victory that was needed in many
ABC’s because of immigrant parents who went through awful culture shock in
the U.S. plus, racism, exclusion, economic injustices, and 1st vs. 2nd.
generation panics and problems. The HUGE PAIN that all these
disorientations and sins gave parents, grandparents, great-grandparents,
etc. were displaced into the future generations, overtly or subtly, either
by anger, nagging, fear, or non-verbal aloofness. Of course, how this
played out is different according to person and family. The good news is
that God has been healing and delivering many from this stigma. It seems
after that the consequences of some sins and “stigmas” need generations for
healing…about four generations… WHAT A PERSONAL HOPE!

3. The Aug. 9 PK conference in Castro Valley was a watershed event for
“hope-giving.” First of all, God has called an awesome bunch of Asian
American leaders and has anointed them for service. This is a new
generational anointing from my perspective. FACE and JEMS represent the
former generation, both somewhat “ethnic specific” in their focus. But
this new leadership represents more of an “ethnic general,” Asian American
and Multicultural focus. Regardless, the present day Asian American
Christian leadership has an assignment from God to impact 21st century
Asian Americans… like never before in U.S. history. The dozens who came
to Christ or rededicated their lives at Castro Valley speaks volumes to this.

Also there was an unplanned phenomenon that occurred. Each Asian American
pastor that spoke, shared struggles, sins, temptations, defeats, in an
unprecedented way. It seemed as if “saving face” was “slapped in the face.”
In effect, it was the first time I have heard such overwhelming personal
honesty and transparency coming from Asian American pastors. More
importantly, it gave permission to the Asian American Christian men
conferees to deal honestly with their sins, trials , temptations, struggles
and defeats. WHAT A BLESSED HOPE FOR RENEWAL!

3. There is unprecedented missions involvement with OBC/ABC churches.
Not only is missions giving up, but more and more Chinese Americans are
finding their way to short-term or long-term missions. Asian Americans are
one of God’s key ways to finish the Great Commission task. There are so
many reasons for this. Let me just mention that I have two letters, one
from the Philippines, and the other from Japan…asking specifically for
Asian Americans to help nationals reach and disciple their countries. ONLY
Asian Americans could fill these needs in these two countries. God has a
special assignment for many ABC’s who expend their lives for the gospel.
WHAT A GLOBAL, MACRO-REDEMPTIVE HOPE!

We all know that having hope doesn’t exempt us for all kinds of trials,
tribulations, and “death” (and then, resurrection) experiences.

BUT, what a beautiful day this is. What a great opportunity for ABC’s in
this generation.

Jer. 33:3,

Tom Steers
L.A.

— End —

From: ArtZech46@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 22:30:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: kenfong@earthlink.net
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

Ken, thanks for your response. I would like to add my humble opinion to
yours

In a message dated 97-09-22 02:50:57 EDT, you write:

<>

Dear Ken. I don’t consider myself becoming more Chinesey. Just becoming
more aware of the Chinese cultural context and how to play by their rules. I
have learned to speak some chinese but don’t want to watch Chinese soap
operas, etc. So I have learned to be flexible and adopting to a cultural
situation. So, in my church I work with people from Hong Kong, Taiwan,
Singapore, and America. Each one has unique personality & cultural cues that
communicate. Seems like a confusing job to switch between all types. Like
mutitasking.

<>

IMHO you are correct! If you want to develop a model to reach the unchurched
americanized ABC’s you cannot do it in the paradigm of the traditional OBC
church. Realistically how many unchurched Asian Americans would want to go
to any church, let alone an immigrant church to find God? I think the issue
of attraction is not with me, but with the church structure. I have had some
genuine ABCs tell me that my church was too Chinesey. I hope I can refer
them to Steve Wong’s church when things get off the ground. Go Steve!

<>

Ken. Clarify. Don’t you mean “definitely NOT reaching?” I think that we
can reach a small percentage of the unchurched ABC in our context. Maybe 5%?
I’ll let you guys know what happens 10 years from now. Maybe someone can
get statistics from Jeff Louie’s ministry in San Francisco. I know the
church is growing but don’t know who they are reaching. Another church is
Cornerstone Baptist in San Francisco.

<>

Agreed. But how many guys or gals out there are called to church plant? Who
is raising up these future church planters and where will they get their
backing? I have yet to see an OBC church do that. (There is probably one I
am not aware of somewhere.) In Northern Cal, which has the 2nd biggest
Chinese church population we are about on decade or more behind LA. Not
everyone is gifted to plant a church. Any suggestions, solutions, or models.
Will Evergreen provide all those church planters ;)? I know you have that
vision for it, but who else has the vision?

My personal vision with this need. I think we need to raise up a generation
of youth, starting in Jr. High with a passion to serve God & reach others.
If we can work and build them up we will have a good crop of ministers 10
years from now. I know John Lo has been working with some guys for several
years since they were in Jr. High in his church and now they are entering
seminary.

I have an idea for the next 10 years. To somehow work & network with
churches so we can get young people into full-time ministry. Those in
college & career may not want to answer the call. I think the majority of us
felt called to ministry when we were in our teen years. (Mine came before I
entered college). I know it won’t solve the current staff crisis shortage
out there but maybe 10 years from now we won’t still be talking about the
same things.

<>

I appreciate your discourse Ken. That was the part of my essay/musings. I
think you & others including myself have alot to say on this subject because
it something close to our hearts! The bottom line is a passion to reach
people whether they are in a Chinese church context or outside. Hope you
appreciate my 3rd generation Chinese “Chong Hay.” (Long windedness)

Two final questions?
1) Which churches have consistently been turning out future ABC or AsAm
ministers and how have they done it?
2) What is the conversion rate at your church? Baptisms? I just want to
get an idea of how effective we are in reaching the unchurched. Most of my
baptisms are youth! They are just as important for the kingdom.

For the Kingdom,
Rev. Arthur Lum
Chinese Church in Christ
San Jose, CA (Silicon Valley)

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Asian-American Church Planters
From: jro6@juno.com (Jonathan c Ro)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 02:35:31 EDT

Ken and Arther,
Amen to what you are saying about the need for more Asian
American church planters. It’s exciting to hear what Steve Wong’s doing.
The way he is going about it is blazing the trail for future
Asian-American church planters.
I’m curious to know how many potential “Steve Wong’s” are out
there? It would be great to network with all potential church planters.
My wife and I are attending a “Church Planting Assessment Seminar” this
October and would greatly benefit from a network like that.
I’m interested in learning more about church planting as it
pertains to reaching Asian Americans. Any advice Ken? Arther? Dave
Gibbons? Anyone? What things need to change from a typical church plant
reaching Caucasians?
Another thought is… could we combine forces with the 2nd
generation Koreans and other Asian ethnic groups to plant these churches.
The Korean Americans are talking about the same issues within their own
circle. The 2nd generation Koreans are a strong force. They have a lot
of zeal that we ABC’s lack. I’m not sure if ABC’s have much dialogue
with them. It would be great to see leadership from both sides working
together to plant these churches. Am I being too idealistic? Is there
an established church planter that can bring us together?

In Christ,
Jon Ro
(Associate Pastor – Chinese Bible Church of Oak Park, IL)

— End —

From: RogerTom@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 23:32:47 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Position Announcement

First Chinese Baptist Church, 1-15 Waverly Place, San Francisco, Ca 94108
Monday – September 22, 1997

Position Announcement
SENIOR PASTOR

THE POSITION

The First Chinese Baptist Church is accepting applications for the position
of Senior Pastor. The Senior Pastor is responsible for the following:
Leading the total church in all its activities especially in the areas of
preaching, interpre-ting the faith, pastoral care, spiritual life
development, evangelism, church growth, nurturing fellowship, and worship
leading.
Administering the business of the church including personnel supervision,
communi-cations, and organizational planning.
Preaching and developing the Sunday Wor-ship Service in English.
Working with the church staff, officers, boards, and committees to carry
out the work of the church.
Giving equal attention to the development of both Chinese-speaking and
English-speaking ministries.

EDUCATION, TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE

The ideal candidate . . .

Has a M.Div. degree or equivalent from an accredited seminary and has been
ordained.
Agrees substantively with Baptist beliefs and traditions and is committed
to support the American Baptist Churches of the USA and to work within its
framework.
Has experience and competence in the areas of responsibility indicated in
this position announcement.
Has experience working in a church with multiple staff and multiple
congregations.
Has the commitment and proven ability to lead the total church in a Chinese
bilingual bicultural context.
Communicates in English and Chinese.

Individuals not meeting all requirements, but who have a strong interest in
serving the church in this position, are encouraged to apply.

APPLICATION PROCEDURE

A complete application for the position requires the submission of the
following:
The Senior Pastor Application Form
A Current Resume and Photo
A Tape of a Recent Sermon
Your Statement of Faith
ABC Personnel Profile
(If Available)

Please send application materials and inquiries to:
Senior Pastor Search Committee c/o Dr. Roger Tom, Chair
2280 Redwood Road, Hercules, CA 94547 (E-Mail: RogerTom@aol.com)

DEADLINE: Completed applications must be received by Friday, October 24,
1997.

THE SELECTION PROCESS

All application materials will be acknowledged and treated confidentially.
Telephone calls and follow-up correspondence will be directed to your home
unless you advise us otherwise. If you become the finalist for the position,
we will request information from your current place of employment. Please
direct all inquiries about the position to the chair of the Search Committee.
The selection process includes an initial paper screening, an interview with
semi-finalists, and a weekend with the finalist.

SALARY/BENEFITS

Salary, benefits, and moving expenses are to be negotiated with the Search
Committee subject to the final approval of the church membership. The total
salary and benefits package range is $65,000-$72,000 plus health plan
coverage.
The term of the position is for an indefinite period subject to the
termination procedures indicated in the church’s constitution.

CHURCH PROFILE AND AFFILIATION

Affiliation. The First Chinese Baptist Church is located in the heart of San
Francisco’s Chinatown. Organized in 1880, the church is affiliated with the
American Baptist Churches of the USA, regionally with the American Baptist
Churches of the West, and locally with the Chinese Christian Union of San
Francisco.

Church Profile. The church has an active membership of 465, and carries out
an extensive and comprehensive ministry for both Chinese-speaking and
English-speaking individuals and families. The current church staff includes
a Senior Pastor, Pastor for Chinese-Speaking Ministries, Pastor for Youth and
Young Adults, Minister of Christian Education, a Night School Coordinator,
Custodian, and 1.5 Secretaries.

Major Initiatives. For the next three years, we are committed to retrofit
the Chinatown church building and to plant a new church in the Sunset
district of San Francisco. During the transition period, we are one church
in two locations.

The Future. We seek God’s leading as we work with our new senior pastor in a
collaborative process to re-examine the church’s vision/ mission, ministries,
and organizational structure in the development of both short-term and
long-range plans.

CHURCH PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

A Typical Sunday

The current Sunday schedule includes a weekly 9:00 am Youth Service, a 10:00
am English Service, an 11:00 am Cantonese Service with a monthly 2:00 pm
Contemporary Service in English. Scheduled concurrently are church school
classes for children, youth, and adults. A number of church groups meet on
Sunday afternoons.

Church Groups

There are fifteen fellowship groups covering the age span from college
students to senior citizens. During the summer, there are a day camp/vcs
program, our own youth camp program, young adult retreats, and a family camp.

Community Outreach

During the week, in cooperation with the Community College District, the
church provides facilities for ESL classes for adult immigrants. In
conjunction with this program, the church has a Night School Coordinator and
sponsors a variety of outreach activities for the children of immigrant
families living in the immediate Chinatown community.

Current Church Vision/Mission Statement
The First Chinese Baptist Church, San Francisco is a multi-generational
bilingual bicultural church.
Through the power of the Holy Spirit, we are called to be a people so
transformed by
God’s gracious love in Jesus Christ that we joyfully commit ourselves
in worship, witness, discipleship and ministry.

FIRST CHINESE BAPTIST CHURCH, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

APPLICATION FORM – SENIOR PASTOR

Name Date

Home Address

City/State/Zip Code

Home Telephone Work Telephone

E-Mail Address Birthdate Birthplace

Married? _____Yes _____No If you have children, please list their
ages:

Please check the category that best describe your language proficiency:
English: _____Native Speaker _____Fluent _____Limited _____None
Cantonese: _____Native Speaker _____Fluent _____Limited _____None

Denominational Affiliation(s)

Name of Your Area Executive Minister

Address

City/State/Zip Code Telephone

Your Current Position

Church/Organization

Address

City/State/Zip Code

No. Active Members Avg. Sun. Attendance Salary Package

References: On the back of this form, please provide us with the names,
addresses, and telephone numbers of three individuals who know you and your
work well and who can comment on you and your ministry.

Application Deadline: Friday, October 24, 1997
If you are applying, please send a completed application form, a current
resume and photo, a tape of a recent sermon, your statement of faith, ABC
Personnel Profile (if available) and a cover letter explaining your interest
in the position to the Senior Pastor Search Committee, c/o Dr. Roger Tom,
Chair, 2280 Redwood Road, Hercules, CA 94547. Thank you.

— End —

Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 02:52:17 -0500
From: Fenggang Yang
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: Chinese-American pastors
To: cac@bccn.org

This list is becoming more and more interesting and stimulating. I have
been carefully reading every posting on this topic. But I was hesitant to
say anything about it. One reason is that I feel I’m an outsider, neither
an ABC nor a minister. As a sociologist researching Chinese churches in
the U.S., I see myself as an observer rather than an advocate. A
sociologist tries to help to achieve better understanding with a special
angle, not necessarily a better angle. Anyway, here are some questions
and ideas:

1. Do you see an overall negative attitude toward Chinese culture by those
ABCs or ABC pastors(-to-be)? Why? Are these ABCs children of earlier
Chinese immigrants? I think that American-born children of earlier
Chinese immigrants (lao qiao) have their reasons to distance themselves
from Chinese culture. Their parents or grandparents came to the U.S. when
there was strong anti-Chinese laws and atmosphere. To be Chinese before
WWII was very disadvantagous. However, children of new Chinese immigrants
(since the 1950s) tend to more appreciate Chinese culture. They came in a
time when the Chinese, along with other Asian ethnics, is becoming the
“model minority”. Their cultural identity helps rather than hinders their
status in American society. For those ABC pastors who are children of
earlier Chinese immigrants, if they want to work among children of new
Chinese immigrants, they may need to understand this.

2. There are some “Asian-American churches”. I really hope to learn more
about these churches. What is their culture? How is their
“Asian-Americanness” constructed? Is it substantially different from the
WASP identity? Is it simply a racial identity–people congregate there
because they all look the same with black hair and yellow skin.

3. For those who want to just evangelize Americanized ABCs, I think it is
still too difficult to keep the exclusiveness. As long as you have the
Chinese identity, no matter how vague it is defined, you will get
not-so-Americanized ABCs, and probably many OBCs as well. Rev. Samuel
Ling once planted an ABC church in New York, but after a few years, it
turned to be a multi-lingual church. (Am I right, Sam?). The Chinese is
a people with strong ethnic identity. You may like it or dislike it, but
it is the reality.

4. Most CAC subscribers are not OBCs, I guess. Therefore, I don’t know
how can you change the OBCs. The magazine has been working
to change OBC churches, but I do not think it very successful so far. It
is a reality that a majority of Chinese in America today are immigrants,
and most churches are immigrant churches. This is a hard reality. As an
OBC myself, I do not want to suggest that ABCs should change themselves.
But I do not see other options for those who have the calling to the
ministry.

5. I strongly agree with Tim, Szeka, Sam, etc. about the lack of
institutional supports for ABCs who want to become pastors. Many Chinese
churches are non-denominational, which is not benefitial to the ministers.
And there are too few Chinese (or Asian) professors at seminaries. The
latter contributes to the negative attitudes toward Chinese culture by ABC
seminarians.

6. I believe that there is no pure Christian who does not have any
culture. You must have some culture, if not Chinese culture, it must be
European-American culture, or some other culture. Here is my challenge to
ABCs: why do you favor European-American culture over Chinese-American
culture? Please do not see this as blame or accusation. Tell you the
truth, before I came to the U.S. I hated Chinese culture myself, just like
the dominant ethos of Chinese intellectuals. However, since I became a
Christian in the U.S., I have become more appreciative of certain Chinese
cultural values.

finally, please pardon me for any grammatic errors. I’m an OBC anyway
:-). I can never speak English like a native-born American. (At a
conference in NY last summer, after three presentations about Asian
American Christian churches, the discussant regarded all of us three
presenters as children of immigrants. However, I’m not a 2nd generation
person, not even a 1.5 generation person. But I did not correct him.
That reflects my wish.)

Fenggang

Fenggang Yang, Ph.D. email: fyang@uh.edu
Department of Sociology http://www.uh.edu/~fyang
University of Houston phone: 713-743-3973
Houston, TX 77204 FAX: 713-743-3943

— End —

Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 10:18:52 -0500
From: Fenggang Yang
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-Korean Differences
To: Edmund K Law , cac@emwave.net

1. Differences between China and Korea: Christian missionaries came
to China along with Western gun-boats and opium-trading boats, which
smashed China’s closed-door and also China’s pride as a highly
civilized nation; whereas Christian missionaries joined other forces
to defend Koreans against Japanese colonialists. Consequently, for
most Chinese, Christianity was stigmatized as a “foreign religion”
or, even worse, a means of Western imperialism, a spiritual opium.
For Koreans, however, Christianity helped to uphold their national
dignity/identity. Consequently, Christianity has grown fast in Korea
since WWII (or earlier?), but grew very slow in China until all
foreign missionaries left in the early 1950s. Today 30% to 40% of
Koreans in Korea are Christians (am I accurate?); but only 1% to 5%
Christians in Chinese societies (mainland, Taiwan and Hong Kong). Do
not simply blame Chinese for not very spiritual or not open to
Christianity. There are historical reasons.

2. Differences between Korean Americans and Chinese Americans: the
church has been the center of the Korean American community in the
last more than a hundred years. Actually it was some American
missionaries who helped or encouraged the first Korean immigrants to
the U.S. However, Chinese immigrants came as coolies at first, and
the church has never been the major ethnic Chinese organization. For
Korean immigrants, the church is often the only place they can get
help in both material and spiritual aspects. For Chinese immigrants,
they have more options. Actually, except some mainline Chinatown
churches, Chinese churches generally do not provide material
assistance to immigrants. The church is in the margin of the Chinese
community.

3. Differences between Korean American Christians and Chinese
American Christians: about 75% Korean Americans attend ethnic
churches, whereas only 10%, or maximum 32%, of Chinese Americans are
affiliated with a church. This means that Korean American Christians
have to go beyond their ethnic boundary IF they want to contintue to
grow or maintain church attendance. 75% is perhaps the ultimum ratio
of Christians. The other 25% in principle will not become Christians
no matter what you do (sorry for my sociologist bias). Also, Korean
immigration to the U.S. began to decline in the 1990s. Therefore,
Koreans have to open-up their church to non-Koreans. Whereas
immigrant Koreans are not willing or able to do that, some 2nd and
1.5 generation Koreans are trying hard. Maybe ABC pastors should get
help from ABKs to evangelize other ABCs.

Fenggang
—————————————————————
Fenggang Yang, Ph.D. fyang@uh.edu
Department of Sociology http://www.uh.edu/~fyang
University of Houston 713-743-3943 (FAX)
Houston, TX 77204-3474 713-743-3973 (phone)

— End —

To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: Chinese-American pastors
From: steveandwinnie@juno.com (Stephen N Wong)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 20:39:06 EDT

Dear Fenggang,

I hate long emails, but your posting really interested me. Here are my
answers to some of your questions (I’ll try to be brief):

<>
I think you’ve hit upon an important distinction within the
Chinese-American community. For example, my parents were raised under
the Exclusion Laws, but my wife (a 1.5 generation ChiAm) has no
experience of the US before the Civil Rights movement. My parents think
that it’s up to the Chinese to reach the Chinese-Americans. That makes
no sense to my wife. But it made sense in the ethos that fostered the
Chinatowns.

Your questions 2. and 3. ask about Asian-American-ness and
Chinese-Americans. For my own church plant’s target group, I would say
that we’re aiming at people who think of themselves as Asian-Americans.
This is not a physical or ethnic identity. It’s a cultural identity,
coming out of the constructs presented to everyone who’s attended “Asian
American studies” classes in the past 25 years.

It’s nice that people are trying to define the Asian-American and
Chinese-American cultures (see your questions 3 and 6), but both of those
cultural identities are in flux, and as a practitioner I want to reach
people wherever they’re at (pardon the dangling preposition :)) and I
can’t wait for the definitive word on cultural identity.

In the meantime, yes, there’s a lack of support structures for ABC
pastors. The immigrant church will probably not change because of their
own issues of survival (i.e, of their own cultural identity). So it’s up
to those of us who see the need to provide as much support as we can.
Kudos to Ken and Corey for Evergreen’s efforts to mentor those called to
the pastorate. And praise God for this forum!

For the Kingdom,

Steve Wong
church planter
San Jose, CA

— End —

From: “DJ Chuang”
To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 15:50:50 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: Church Planting stories

[the following is an email from Ron Fong which got bounced to me by the
server because of some magic keyword in the first paragraph or something]

To: ArtZech46@aol.com, kenfong@earthlink.net
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Church Planting stories ( was Chinese American Pastors )

In a message dated 97-09-22 22:38:02 EDT, ArtZech46@aol.com writes:

<>

where is the True Light Presbyterian Church of L.A. with their church
planting stories? where is the northern California equivalent? What
happened to the 1980’s CMA vision to church plant chinese american churches in
surburbia? I know there are chinese american church planting stories.
let’s get them out and share what went right and what could have been done
better and then build on it.

Ron Fong
Fremont, CA ( SF Bay Area )

— End —

From: AsianPK@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 17:37:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: CAC_Mail: Asian Ministry Directory?

Part of my job with Promise Keepers is to help promote greater networking
within the Asian/Asian American evangelical community. Presently I am
seeking help in pulling together as many listings as possible of Asian or
Asian American para-church ministry organizations in the USA. I realize
there are several directories already in existence but these tend to be
focused on primarily one Asian sub group such as Chinese, etc. I would like
to help create a new directory that would become as comprehensive as
possible. I could help make this directory available via email or printed
form (nominal fee for printing and postage).

Here are the parameters –

1. Any Christian organization/ministry that considers itself to be
evangelical.

2. Primary focus of this group is ethnic specific toward an Asian or Asian
American audience. (Large ministries such as InterVarsity may list key
staff or departments that have a focus on Asian or Asian American groups)

Here is a list of data we would like to gather –

1. Name of organization/ministry
2. Key contact person
3. Address of ministry and key contact person
4. Phone numbers
5. Email addresses
6. Please state the general mission statement of the organization
7. Please state the general target audience of the organization
8. Please provide a brief history of the organization
9. Please specify the general range of the ministry, ie. national? regional?

Some of the organizations that I would like to see listed in such a directory
would include groups such as FACE, JEMS, AACF, IWA, CCM, Catalyst,
Ambassadors for Christ, etc. It might be helpful to also list conference
ministries such as MCBC (Midwest Chinese Bible Conference) and many others
from around the country.

This directory would be available only for ministry purposes and will not be
released to anyone or any group seeking to use it for commercial purposes.

Please send me info and data you might have personally as well as passing
this note on to others who may be able to help. I will eventually seek to
pass this ministry project on to a group of volunteers who can help maintain
and develop this directory resource.

In His service with you,

Louis Lee

— End —

From: “DJ Chuang”
To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 21:18:34 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: JEMS concerts

originally From: Nsoulpkim@aol.com
Date sent: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 21:07:38 -0400 (EDT)

two JEMS fall concerts. Both are free

Southern California
September 27, 6PM
SoCal – First Chinese Baptist – Walnut (City of Industry)
1555 Fairway Drive, Industry (60 off at Fairway So)

Featuring: Calvin Joe, Holiness Youth Choir, Steve Moriya, Valerie Oishi, Tim
Yang, Lowell Sue

Northern California
October 11, 6PM
No Cal – San Lorenzo Christian Church (Holiness Church)
615 Lewelling Blvd, San Leandro (Frwy 880-So, Off at L
turn R; Frwy 880 No. off at Hesperian, turn R on Hesperian, and immediate L on
Lewelling. Featuring: Karin Cheung, SL Gospel Youth Choir, Valerie Oishi,
Selah, Wendy and John Tode and Peter Lum, and Becky Lum

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:19:52 -0700
Subject: CAC_Mail: Chinese-Korean Differences
From: ed.law@juno.com (Edmund K Law)

On Mon, 22 Sep 1997 01:51:18 -0400 (EDT) HarryWLew@aol.com writes:

>My Korean-American students don’t seem face the same kind of
>discouragement
>from their parents. Are Koreans more likely than we Chinese to regard
>the
>ministry as a worthy calling and profession?

Quite possibly. In the Chicagoland area there are about forty Chinese
congregations/fellowships and about four HUNDRED Korean
congregations/fellowships. Note: The Chinese population of the
Chicagoland area is much greater than the Korean population.

Another more general observation: The spiritual vitality of the average
Korean Christian tends to be greater than the spiritual vitality of the
average Chinese (American) Christian.

Some highly speculative musings:

1. Culture. After centuries of repelling Chinese onslaughts (on the
mother continent, mind you!), Koreans have learned to band together for
self-defense. Except for family ties, the Chinese don’t have a clue.
Hence, Koreans are culturally predisposed to the mutuality and community
of church life.

2. Spiritual Discipline. After centuries of harsh living on the Korean
Peninsula, Koreans are culturally predisposed to a serious commitment to
spiritual disciplines, particularly prayer. God has heard these prayers,
and God has blessed Korean Christians with much fruit, not only in South
Korea, but throughout the world.

3. God is similarly blessing and growing persecuted Chinese Christians
IN CHINA. Spiritual lethargy and lack of commitment seems to the be
condition of Chinese Christians OUTSIDE OF CHINA.

Any other ideas in CAC-land?

Grace and Peace

Ed Law (a Chinese guy)
Sacramento

— End —

From: JWongCDI@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:46:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: a source of joy

Hi Art;
Thank you for sharing. Your own commitment and understanding of the needed
commitment to Christ in order to serve His Church is very positive and a
source of joy for me. I know a few like yourself and probably a few more who
have not declared themselves so clearly. I carry a great burden for the
Chinese churches, which has not treated me well either, but we served them
since 1961, for the sake of Christ. Because He is faithful, you’ll be able
to speak like that too, some day. 🙂

Although much insights are being shared these past few days about the
difficulties in trying to serve the Chinese churches, the OBC leadership must
not only become aware of them, but must be somehow drawn into a search for
solutions. I believe Dr. Gail Law’s thesis had pointed out the loss of ABC
children from the Chinese churches over almost a century is about 96%. A
century when OBC leaders have been telling the ABCs that you have to become
like us, to serve or survive. They must somehow realize, their ways have not
worked and will not. Without that, they will continue to impose their
cultural Christianity on their churches, which leaves the ABCs on the
outside. Ironically, the loss is their own children – in a culture that
prioritizes the welfare of their children.

Art, as I said, I liked your input, but there is one item I’d like to add an
idea. You wrote Maxwell’s axiom, “leadership is influence.” I would propose
the question, what is the responsibility of a spiritual leader? My answer
is, “In whatever situation, To make clear what is GOOD to do and the RIGHT
way to do it.”
2 Tim. 2:24 And the Lord’s bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind
to all, able to teach, patient when wronged, 25 with gentleness correcting
those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading
to the knowledge of the truth, 26 and they may come to their senses {and
escape} from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do
his will.
I think the spiritual leader’s responsibility is not to MAKE people do what
is good.

Your yokefellow in Christ,
Joseph C. Wong
Church Dynamics International (Chinese Ministries)
(SF Bay area)

— End —

From: JWongCDI@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: re: Chin-Amer pastors

Greetings;
I have been a pastor in Chinese churches on the West coast since 1961, but am
now serving as a consultant to pastors and church leaders.
Please allow me to submit an offering: I’ll try to be brief.

IMHO (“in my humble opinion,” I think) there may be a need to re-examine the
place of culture in the Chinese churches. The practice seems to be a
promoting of one’s own culture as better, and a despising of the other. We
may even be as bold as to call those of the other culture “evil.” However,
we usually soften it with “lazy” or “uncommitted” or “lacks integrity” or
“irrelevant.”

My perspective is that foreign missions of the 19th and early 20th century
missionaries brought the Gospel to third world country and applied it by
developing Western-style churches. This was acknowledged as a mistake and
forsaken in the mid-20th century and a new approach was adopted. The
churches in the third world countries were to be allowed, encouraged to
express their Christianity according to their own culture.

This resulted in Philippino (sp?) churches, Chinese churches, African and
Chicano churches. Interestingly, this has done little to unify the
Christian Church. Implied in this development is the concept that the
Christian Faith may be expressed within the many cultures of this world. It
seems to me that a basic concept is being overlooked. The Gospel is not
designed to be EXPRESSED by the culture in which it blossoms, but its purpose
is to TRANSFORM the very culture in which it blooms. Rather than the culture
of a land acting as a covering over the Gospel, the Gospel is to radically
alter that culture.

It needs to be said, that the Gospel is not only to eliminate the “evils” in
a culture, but to transform the “good” of a culture as well. I believe this
is what caused some considerable tension in the first century church.
Christianity was changing even the culture of the Jews, transforming its
sins AND values.

Significantly, the accusations against Stephen were not denied.
Acts 6:13-7:1; And they put forward false witnesses who said, “This man
incessantly speaks against this holy place, and the Law; 14 for we have heard
him say that this Nazarene, Jesus, will destroy this place and alter the
customs which Moses handed down to us. ”
Also the accusation against Paul. Acts 21:21 and they have been told about
you, that you are teaching all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake
Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children nor to walk according to
the customs.

For me, the passage in Isaiah 55:8-9, is the basis for understanding the
place of culture in the bi-cultural churches. The two characteristics that
God disavowed are the basic parts of a culture; “the thoughts and the ways of
a people.” The point seems to be that God does not recommend nor chose any
of the cultures of Man, but proposes that His Kingdom’s culture is undeniably
and radically different from those on earth.

The application suggested is that neither the Chinese nor the American
culture is the standard of the Christian Faith and therefore, we can stop
comparing between them and competing. We can be released from the duty of
defending our own culture as the better one. Instead, let each of us humbly
renounce the culture of our childhood as unfitting for the Church and seek to
discover what is truly the “thoughts and the ways of God.”

enuf for now.

Joseph C. Wong
San Rafael, CA (SF bay area)
Church Dynamics International (Chinese Ministries)

— End —

From: JWongCDI@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:43:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Chi-Am is a wonderful challenge

Ken;
I continue to appreciate the thoughtfulness and forthrightness (eg:
“Titanic”) of your inputs. Even when I have a different perspective, they
are instructive to me. So, thank you.

Since we have had little opportunities to visit, your latest email to Art
“fleshes out” more of your thinking for me. In many ways, your journey is
similar to mine. I too was told, late 50’s, that I needed to learn Chinese
to serve in the Chinese church and I had seriously considered going to Hong
Kong for a year to do so. But I realized that there were a lot of OBC
pastors available to serve the immigrants and very few of us ABC pastors. So
why am I preparing myself to minister among OBCs? Like yourself, early in my
ministry, I decided that I didn’t want to become more Chinese.

But since the characteristics of the Chinese church is bi-cultural, the
context of serving the ABCs included the OBC culture. I sought to understand
OBC culture, their “thoughts and ways.” (Of course, today, we know that ABCs
outside of the church need the Lord too.) This was reflected by Rev. Steve
Chinn in Boston, who wrote about his aim at Getting along with the OBC pastor
for the sake of the ABCs. (published by CCM’s “Challenger”) It doesn’t have
to be an either I become less Amercanized, or I can’t serve in the Chinese
churches.

Still, Ken, I saw in the East coast Chinese churches, ABC’s who were serving
in the Chinese churches, who reflected a great deal of the OBC’s culture.
Their adaptation to the situation is very great. There, the grip of the OBC
culture is tenacious. It is truly a sad situation for ABC ministries. 😦

So, I agree with you Ken. The ABAsians will probably not readily join a
typical Chinese church without a paradigm shift. Their change can happen if
a multi-ethnic, multi-culture church is anticipated and welcomed. In your
situation, it seems to be happening, but from the context of an ABAsian
controlled church. Can it happen from an OBAsian church? What would it
take?

My approach (as was FACE’s) then, has been to address the OBC leadership in
the OBC church to call them to make adjustments for the flourishing of ABC
(not simply survival) ministries. ABAsians is a further step, but not
necessarily far in the future, if we can achieve the first. I believe one of
the significant concept to try and achieve this is an understanding of the
place of culture in God’s Kingdom. (my earlier input)

Joseph C. Wong
Church Dynamics International (Chinese Ministries)
near San Francisco

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:55:35 -0700
From: “GE Liang”
Subject: CAC_Mail: A Coffee House Dialog

Dear CACers:

The ongoing dialog between Joseph, Fenggang, Art, Stephen, Ed, Ken and others is
GREAT!

On the heavy subject of Christianity and Culture, i’d like to submit a lighter piece.
It’s a fictional coffee house dialog and it can be found at http://www.bitsmart.com/coffeehouse_dialog.
It starts like this:

“The Starbucks was brand new in the Kingstowne community and in the early evenings
was never crowded. Martin and John found a table by the window with a view to John’s
’96 Accord without difficulty. The two had just enough time to grab a cup of joe
between work and the baby shower for Ken and Barbara later that evening. They had
been friends for almost a year now. They had met at the Traditional Ethnic Full Gospel
Church…”

It’s got an East Coast lense on the matter. But, i think some of the recent thoughts
are captured in broad strokes. Enjoy!

Thanks go to Rebecca Yee .nee Fong for editorial assistance.

Coram Deo,
Guo-En

Guo En Liang
Washington, DC
|
The one who carves the Buddah never worships it.
– Chinese proverb
|
God created man in his own image, in Gods image created he him. Male and female created
he them.
– Genesis 1:27

Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere!
http://www.mailexcite.com

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:59:15 -0700
From: “GE Liang”
Subject: CAC_Mail: Galations 3:28

Dear CACers:

Also checked out DJ’s recommended sites and found interesting material covering or
alluding to Gal. 3:28.

(Sorry for bringing up old subjects.) These are some links to ponder.

http://www.goldengate.net/mall/cbe/may.htm

http://www.cbmw.org/html/chapter_7.html

Coram Deo,
Guo-En


Guo En Liang
Washington, DC
|
Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere!
http://www.mailexcite.com

— End —

From: JLoFEC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 20:35:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Chinese-Americans in Ministry

Friends –

when i wrote my first set of questions re: ABCs in ministry, i had no idea
it’d spark such a discussion. i thought i’d hold off before writing anything
and just read what comes up, but at last count there have been 41 posts on
the subject in the last week (whew!)

one of the thing which has concerned me about this whole subject has to do
with where the leaders for our present youth group-aged kids will come from
in the next ten years. i’m sure we’re all aware of the high drop-off rates
for ABCs in traditional OBC churches at two points: (a) when they first get
into college; (b) when they graduate. and this is a different question
altogether from their unreached peers.

the high number of asian-americans in college ministries like iv and navs
seem to indicate that college-aged abcs are being reached at a high
percentage than the 5% figure that’s usually thrown about for ABCs as a whole
(am i right in this assumption). but what happens afterwards?

frankly, when i was in seminary (i graduated from fuller in 1987, i think i
was a little more optimistic about some of these questions than i am now). my
reason for this is that it’s seemed to me that in the LA area, while some ABC
and AA churches are being planted (go steve!), most bilingual churches are
kind of going *backwards* on the assimilation scale because of the high
number of immigrants who have been coming in from asia over the last 15 years
or so. i used to think that the assimilation process was just a natural
phenomena and that young ABCs would get involved in ministries, and that as
their churches changed with the times, everything would iron itself out.

i wrote a paper on FACE, and my conclusion at the time was that the kinds of
things they were trying to implement maybe weren’t really necessary.

but after my years of watching this scene, i’m beginning to get a little
worried. as many of you have pointed out, since most chin-am churches are
independents, this whole mentoring thing for abc’s left to (a) obc pastors;
(b) iv staff workers, who aren’t really ministering in churches; (c) no one
[take your pick]. and abc post-seminarians aren’t all making it through.

scary scenario.

in our own church, as i mentioned before, i have one recent fuller grad, and
three students who are just getting started at fuller. i’m concerned about
how to get them ready for what’s out there. at our church, we just hired a
senior pastor from singapore who doesn’t speak any chinese. our english
ministry is the larger than our two chinese ministries, and our board
meetings are all in english.

but our church is atypical. and i’m afraid my guys are going to get spoiled
by the kind of freedom that i have over here, and then will not be able to
make it when they take some job somewhere and get hit by the “real world”.
those “junior positions” at chinese churches would, i’m afraid, be culture
shock to my young people, unless they feel God calling them to cross-cultural
ministry (unless, of course, the Lord moves in our church enough for us to be
able hire them in three years…. =)

i appreciate art’s words re: carrying the cross, cultural sensitivity,
perseverance, etc. that’s part and parcel of the ministry anyway. but any of
us that has seen that high school-to-college drop-off and that post-college
drop-off in traditional OBC (as well as bilingual) churches knows that if
those of us that don’t have a little more seasoning (having “made it” through
the first 18 months) put our heads together, things aren’t going to get any
better.

as an ABC son of an OBC pastor who (barely) made it through THAT transition,
i think there are specific differences between the 1.0 and 2.0 mindsets,
understanding of the gospel and experience of the faith which have to be
addressed (i think ken can speak better about what comes after that). in my
own household, during the time i was in seminary, and afterwards, during my
period of leaving the church and faith (NOT a fuller issue, i don’t think
=), my father and i had LOTS of discussions about the big emphasis on our
sinful human nature which always seemed to be such a big part of his sermons.
they weren’t theological discussions, but practical ones, in terms of the
amount of emphasis this should play in preaching, etc.

since that time, i’ve felt like there is a primarily will-oriented,
cognitive-based faith basically which assumes that if the truth is laid out
there correctly, people will know what to do. if this doesn’t work, them
guilt or shame can be used to light the fire and get the spiritual atoms
moving =).

in contrast, i’ve found that that just doesn’t work that well for me. there
are lots of times when i know what to do, but motivation, etc. are hard to
come by. there are other ways to change behavior. social relationships are
important. so is narrative preaching. and mentoring. and they seem to be
really important for 2.0’s. i will listen to someone who i can sense is a
real person because of their vulnerabiility. without that, it just sounds
like a lecture.

whether or not this is a 2.0 thing or a gen-X thing is a little hard for me
to figure out. either way, it’s cultural, and our culture affects our
understanding and expression of the faith.

i feel fortunate to have been able to minister in a place where i was allowed
to figure this out. my church (thank God, it just wasn’t my father and me …
he actually was never my direct supervisor) allowed me to start a youth
service without much fuss. over there, i was able to work on some of this
stuff without being critiqued at every single point.

i think young ABC pastors are going to need those kinds of healthy
environments or terrariums in which these little seedlings can take root, be
shielded from everything that’s out there for a while until their spiritual
and ministry roots have sunk into the soil a little bit.

what kind of things do you all think are necessary for an environment like
this?

* * * *
John Lo
Pastor of Youth and Young Adults
English Congregation
First Evangelical Church, Glendale, CA
818.240.5633
JLoFEC@aol.com
* * * *

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 19:15:16 -0600
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Galations 3:28
From: gdot@juno.com (G Ottoson)

On Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:59:15 -0700 –> DJ via “GE Liang”
writes:

>Among the evangelicals, there are 2 major organizations that deal with
>issues regarding gender roles:
>
>Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
>
>and
>
>Christians for Biblical Equality

Interesting, esp the second time around 🙂 Is the ‘confusion’ reduced by
the fact that there are two opposing interpretations of Scripture?

Apparently Evangelicals, under one sovereign name, have two supposedly
‘valid’ interpretations of one (supreme) authoritative book guiding two
approved organizations opposed to each other’s meaning of gender and
love.

What message does this send to people?

Do Jesus’ observations…’the blind leading the blind’ (redacted, Matthew
15, 23) properly come to mind?

G

PS. Brother Richard: I’m impressed with your challenge to me on how to
challenge people:) Thx. How’s your email on Scandinavia comin’ along?
Here’s a poem for you:

Man Power

To Man fallen
You man be..

You man callin’
You Man free

Oh my goodness
You man sweet
You man would this
Mankind meet

You man kind
You a-lone..

You Man find
You Unknown

You man speakin’
You man God
You man love me
i am awed

c. 1997 go

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:19:38 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: OCA list of upcoming Asian American Conferences

CACers:

The Organization of Chinese Americans just posted a list of upcoming Asian
American conferences. It is a rather lengthy post, so email me privately if
you would like a copy. – Tim
————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:42:55 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Fwd: AAASCommunity: “The Korean American Dream”

CACers:

FYI. Looks like Koreans are not just more “spiritual” than Chinese, but
better at getting published about their own communities! Hang in there and
lean upon God, everyone! – Tim
————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————
Forwarded message:
From: dtn@ucla.edu (Don T. Nakanish)
Sender: owner-aaascommunity@uclink4.berkeley.edu
To: aaascommunity@uclink.berkeley.edu (AAASPOS), assnaas-socal@uci.edu
Date: 97-09-24 15:51:09 EDT

Diana de Cardenas (dianadec@support.ucla.edu) For Immediate Use
(310) 206-1464 Sept. 16, 1997

UCLA ANTHROPOLOGY PROFESSOR RELEASES NEW BOOK ON
KOREAN IMMIGRANTS, SMALL BUSINESSES AND CULTURAL
IDENTITY

Korean immigrants in the United States establish their own small
businesses at a rate exceeding that of immigrants from any other nation,
according to a new book by UCLA Professor Kyeyoung Park. In “The
Korean American Dream: Immigrants and Small Business in New York
City,” Park writes that more than one third of all Korean immigrant adults
are involved in small businesses.

Park examines this phenomenon in Queens, N.Y. — where
two-thirds of New York City’s Koreans live — tracing its historical
foundations and exploring the transformation of Korean cultural identity
prompted by participation in an enterprise. The book documents ways in
which Korean immigrants use entrepreneurship to improve the quality of
their lives, focusing on their concerns and anxieties, as well as their
joys.

— End —

From: “Peter Szto”
Organization: Calvin College
To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 12:50:58 EST5EDT
Subject: CAC_Mail: ethnic church challenge

DC makes a good point about knowing and “interpreting” the
surrounding culture. Another perspective to take is for Christians, of
whatever theological and ethnic stripe, to be more self-consciuosly involved in
the production of culture. Why must we Christians always be passive
respondents to culture, whether high or low? Doesn’t God call us to
be agents of cultural transformation?

Peter Szto

— End —

From: “DJ Chuang”
To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:39:14 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: ethnic church challenge

CACers,
I shared a good chat online with Timothy Tseng last night, and wanted to
share with you some of our observations concerning the challenge of
ministering in the ethnic Chinese church. (a new chat software called AOL
Instant Messenger allows Internet users to talk with AOLers real-time, check
it out at http://www.aol.com/ ; my screen name is djchuangix)

The challenges of ministering in the ethnic Chinese church perhaps shouldn’t
be blamed just on culture, especially since culture is always changing and
fluid, and among the ethnic Chinese, there is a great diversity of background
and such.. Timothy suggests that we who minister to the ethnic Chinese need
to understand power dynamics in a congregational setting as well as the wider
community and societal context in which a congregation resides.

Culture is not something that solely shapes people. People are free agents
to alter culture whenever they want to. What actually happens is that
some will employ stereotypical cultural patterns of both Chinese and American
whenever it suited their advantage, thus the power struggle aspect enters
into ministry dynamics.

For the “OBC”, Chinese patterns were preferred.. perhaps this is because that
is the only way that OBCs can exercise authority over us ABC types. Now why
would OBC’s want to control ABC’s, as such? Perhaps out of fear, out of
concern, out of genuine faith in what they’ve been taught theologically and
ecclesiologically, and/or out of discrimination they face in society.

>From my conservative evangelical training (I’m DTS trained), we were equipped
to be biblical minded pastors, but for many congregations (and especially
ethnic ones), they have certain pastoral molds and certain cultural contexts
that they desire to be respected. Timothy commented that seminaries should
train pastors to be culture exegetes, and places like Fuller and other
“mainline” seminaries tend to teach people how to analyze the culture.

Now I retorted, if that’s true, that we have cultural exegetes, then wouldn’t
someone have exegeted the ethnic Chinese culture, and come up with a viable
model for bi-cultural ministry? I don’t think that’s happened yet, or it
takes more time to exegete culture.

Some pastors have noticed that churches that are pastor planted do okay, but
churches that emerge from a Bible Study don’t do so well, in the pastoral
ministry aspects. And that might explains a lot. Lay leaders not used to
submitting to anyone now must listen to the pastor they called. Hard for
them to change. Lack of ecclesiological theology (that happens when one
only does Bible Study without theological or church history foundation).

Where did all this come from? I myself am leaving an ethnic Chinese church
ministry, having served 2 years as youth pastor in one. Yes, I’m fresh out of
seminary, and this is my first ethnic Chinese church ministry; having no
Christian home upbringing background, no Chinese church background, a Bible
church background where many lay people were well-versed in Scripture, my
idealism was high.

Even though I do speak the Chinese language, and even preached once in
Chinese, that’s not enough… recognizing that I made some irrevocable
cultural “faux pas” (concept of forgiveness seems foreign in this context),
and receiving the Lord’s provision for another opportunity, I’m putting
closure to this chapter.

DJ

*

— End —

To: cac@bccn.org
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 12:54:27 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors
From: drwong1@juno.com (Richard Wong)

Regarding Arthur Lum’s comments on pastoral burnout and how he “survived”
as an ABC in order to minister in an OBC church, I share a lot of his
experiences and views. I was born and raised stateside, and attended
all-white churches and schools through high school and college. After
moving out here for grad school, I started attending and serving in my
current church. At first, it was difficult to get used to the OBC
“Chinese” culture, but the Lord has worked on my heart and attitudes to
enable me to serve and to stay. Although I don’t have an formal ministry
title, I’m serving in a variety of ministry roles as a tentmaker. Most
recently, I feel like I’m being used as a quasi-Youth Pastor — right
now, I’m serving as a Teens Group Sponsor, a Senior High Sunday School
teacher, an English congregation core group member, and representing the
younger “English” (ABC) congregation on the church board.

Finding a ministry niche was hard at first, because as an ABC, I had to
get used to the church’s dominant OBC culture. But once I realized the
need for someone to reach out to the ABC offspring of these OBC
congregants, I found my calling. It really has to come from a love and a
desire to see others saved, a vision that keeps you going despite
setbacks and adversity, a willingness to sacrifice, a willingess to
humble oneself, and from a desire to learn and understand a “foreign”
culture, even if it’s supposed to be your own! It opened up a lot of
people’s hearts when I finally enrolled in the Church’s Chinese school!
(Reading back over this paragraph, the concepts and thoughts in this
paragraph are the basis for a successful marriage!)

During the seven years I’ve been with the church, the church has had
three different senior pastors (Chinese-speaking) and three associate
pastors (English-speaking). I guess this falls within the time span
given for ministers who drop out due to burnout and frustration, but
although they all had their frustrations with the church from time to
time, none of our pastors left because of burnout. Rather, two of the
Chinese pastors were “terminated” by the congregation (I guess you could
consider it due to frustration and burnout on the congregation’s part),
while two of the English pastors left for other opportunities. One went
to a larger church to be closer to family, while the other left for law
school(!). Personally, I don’t know why somebody would leave the
ministry for law school. I know a couple of guys who did the reverse
(Greg Jao — are you still receiving these messages?), and some who are
doing both law and ministry full time (like myself), but to go from doing
the Lord’s work to the, ah, “other guy’s” work, puzzles me. But I guess
God can use a few good lawyers, too. 🙂

Richard Wong
Arlington, VA
CCCGWDC

— End —

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 15:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dennis Low
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors
To: Richard Wong
cc: cac@bccn.org

Hi Richard. Rev. Dennis Low here from Silicon Valley. Thanks for your
sharing & encouraging words.

Just to add to the continuing discussion, it is also good for ABC pastors
to see the work the “OBC” church is doing to reach out to
immigrants/Chinese speaking people. I sincerely doubt that an ABC church
would be as successful shepherding a CHinese speaking congregation.
Since I am an ABC in a Bilingual church, I could identify with Richard &
Art’s situation. Hi Art!

But I have found that it’s helpful to not just focus on “my” ministry to
English speakers. I’m also concerned about the Mandarin congregation.
My perspective is that I am a pastor of the church, which includes both
English & Mandarin speaking people. My area of focus is to those who are
English speaking, whether they are ABC, ARC, OBC who prefer to speak
English, Asian AMerican, or just plain English speakers. Yet I also
minister to those in the Chinese congregation when the need or
opportunity arises.

It’s a good reminder to not see the “OBC” as an enemy or obstacle for
growth. Romans 12:9-21 has given me much advice on how to deal with the
OBC-ABC struggle in Church ministry, especially verse 18

Romans 12:18
If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men.

I’m going on my 5th year as a pastor at the same Chinese church. It’s been
an exciting time seeing the Lord grow His church. I look forward to many
more years. But I also know there’s a great deal still to learn. Thanks
for all the sharing from everyone.

In Christ,
Dennis

Pastor, Home of Christ in Cupertino

— End —

From: “DJ Chuang”
To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:01:42 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: tips on posting

Note to CAC subscribers:

The CAC Mailing List now has almost 200 subscribers, which by Internet
standards is not that large, but for many of us who are new to online
discussions, the number of posts by even a handful can seem
overwhelming.

In order to keep the flow of discussion efficient and effective, here are a
few tips on posting to the CAC mailing list:

— post messages to all by sending an email to

— only quote back a few lines in your replies, just enough to give a
context; not the whole message

— write in a cordial and clear manner, since email doesn’t convey
non-verbal cues

— keep each post within 4 screen fulls; no lengthy articles or treatises
(if you do have something really useful/ good, do let us know about it on
CAC, and those interested can request it from you)

The recent discussion have been cordial and insightful, and I would invite
those who are readers to contribute accordingly. Also I would like to ask
you to let others know about the CAC Mailing List, whether to join as active
contributors, or to become readers who might benefit from our discussions.

To join CAC, simply send an email message to “majordomo@emwave.net” and on
the first line of the message body, write “subscribe cac” [without quotes].
You’ll receive a confirmation/ welcome message.

Thank you for being a part of CAC,
DJ

*

— End —

From: “DJ Chuang”
To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:10:26 -0500
Subject: CAC_Mail: (Fwd) BlockParty ’97

——- Forwarded Message Follows ——-
From: Nsoulpkim@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:40:19 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Re: could you post this information

FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!
FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!
FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!FREE!!!

This is your official invite to BLOCKPARTY’97 music fest, Sat. September 27,
1997 10a-6p. That’s right, FIVE kickin’ bands hitting you hard with
everything from Pop to Hip-hop. The line up includes:

GINA – performing from “The Nitro Praise album” and her newest release,

“Never Knew Love Like This”
RICH YOUNG RULER
THE VOICE
AUTUMN MOONS
S.S.M.O.B.

WAIT THERE’S MORE!!!

We”ve got FOOD&FUN goin’ on as the band to their thang. So, don’t you fret
over what to bring. Just get yourself, your friend, your blanket/chair to
BLOCKPARTY’97.

Checkout our website at:
http://members.aol.com/BParty1997/

Directions:
Bellflower First United Methodist Church Parking Lot
14525 Bellflower Blvd, Bellflower,CA 90706
Corner of Bellflower & Rosecrans

91 fwy (near 605), exit Bellflower, go north (1.5 miles), left at Maplewood.
or… 605 fwy (between 105 and 91), exit Rosecrans, go west (1.0 mile), left
Bellflower, quick right at Maplewood. or… 105 fwy (near 605), exit Bellflower, go south (1.0 mile), right at Maplewood.

— End —

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:46:01 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: CAC_Mail: ABC Ministry: Random Thoughts

Dear CACers:

Left town for a few days and am pleasantly surprised by the outpour of
excellent, rigorous posts on ABC ministry. Keeping up with CAC is like
taking a language course: if you are a week behind…

First all, I am deeply moved by the sharing of frustrations by John Lo,
Sam Ling, Arthur Lum, etc (I haven’t finished reading). I’ve learned a
great deal, and the stories reinforce a lot of my suspicions and
experiences of how ABCs are treated in predominantly OBC churches.
There is no malice, of course, on anyone’s part. But the OBC culture is
tough to stomach. I here speak as an OBC, though “1.5er” is nearer the
mark. I don’t see much change in OBC churches, not when they continue
to grow the way they have been growing–on strength of immigrants and
foreign students.

Yet, I am convinced the future of Chinese churches in America belongs to
ABCs. I hope I am not perceived here as dichotomizing the Chinese-Am
churches. But the OBC identity is inextricably tied to the old country:
every event, every change “over there” triggers an emotional response
more profound than anything experienced as part of this society. No
value judgment, just reactions issued from the core of our being. Here
I speak from experience: despite more than 20 years as citizen of this
great country, things across the Pacific affect me like nothing else.
I’ve lived in Philippines, Israel, Holland, Germany, not to mention
China and Hong Kong, and I’ve visited a great deal more; there is no
nation that can match America in its enlightened attitudes and
humaneness (problematic as they still are), and there is no designation
other than “American” I would rather hyphenate my identity to. (Boy,
it’s liberating to dangle your preposition!) Still, I’ll never forget
this overwhelming, powerful, utterly transcendent surge of emotions that
took me out of and beyond myself into the bosom of the congregation when
I first witnessed the reopening of the Shanghai Community Church after a
decade of Cultural Revolution. The attachment is real, and OBCs are
dishonest if they (we?) think they (we?) are above it.

That’s precisely the problem, isn’t it? They (We?) still want to
re-create their (our?) now-lost worlds in the new.

For ABCs, however, your (our?) place is here. If any genuine
Chinese-American Christianity is to come about, it’s your (our?)
responsibility. Chinese-Americanism is a cultural or subcultural
system, whether you (we?) like it or not; the question is whether or not
you (we?) take ownership of it.

Correct me if I over-analyze. It seems to me that when questions about
PK were raised, there appeared to be an unspoken preference for “pure”
Christianity to an Asian-American version of it. In our current
discussion of ABC ministry, however, as opposed to OBC ministry, there
seems to be a willingness to entertain the constitutive role culture
plays in our Christian identity. I haven’t thoroughly digested the
dialogue between Tim and DJ and will perhaps comment on it later.

If this is true, it may be the result of an inherent paradox in
Christianity. There is no such thing as “pure,” “abstract,” or
“disembodied” Christianity. Since it is incarnational in essence, no
one has access to Christianity except through its concrete
manifestation, namely the congregation, the church, fellowship, you and
me. A Christianity without ecclesiology (systematic thinking about the
church) is like life without body. But as soon as we factor in the
human dimension, culture–that comprehensive system of symbols, rituals,
customs, morality, values that informs who we are and what we aspire
to–insinuates itself into our consciousness. The result is that, when
we worship God, we do so as fully enculturated people.

A question for the better informed: Are there national supports for ABC
ministry? FACE (Fellowship for American-Chinese Evangelicals) is one,
but is it adequate for the needs articulated in our discussion? There
are mainline-denominational supports as well (e.g., UMC, Episcopal, Am
Baptist), as well as academic programs (Fuller, Regent College,
Princeton, Claremont, Garrett-Evangelical, to name a few), but they
rarely have the national stature CAC appears to be attaining. Maybe
strong support could come out of CAC. It seems to provide the kind of
forbearing understanding, patient ecumenical spirit that we yearn for.
Maybe one day we can get organized….

Peace and grace,
Sze-kar

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 19:13:45 -0700
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Galations 3:28
From: ed.law@juno.com (Edmund K Law)

G writes:

“Apparently Evangelicals, under one sovereign name, have two supposedly
‘valid’ interpretations of one (supreme) authoritative book guiding two
approved organizations opposed to each other’s meaning of gender and
love.

What message does this send to people?”

Sola scriptura. Better get up to speed and read the Bible for yourself.

Ed Law
Sacramento

— End —

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 19:30:15 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: Fenggang Yang
CC: Edmund K Law , cac@emwave.net
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-Korean Differences

Hey, Dr. Yang, I for one truly appreciate your socio-historical info on
the diff’s between Chinese and Koreans. Very helpful. I learned a
lot. Thanks for taking the time.

Rev. Dr. Ken Uyeda Fong
Evergreen Baptist Church of Los Angeles
(a multi-Asian, multi-ethnic ministry)

— End —

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:34:55 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: Stephen N Wong
CC: schall@almaak.usc.edu, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Re: Chinese-American pastors

I agree with Steve that the Asian American cultures (yes, plural) are in
flux…and I think they always will be. But I also believe that we
church leaders can play key and active roles in shaping some of them.

For example, this year, as I’ve taken on the senior pastor role at the
newly re-established Evergreen of LA, I’ve felt led to evolve our
demographic target audience from what we’ve been calling Americanized
Asian Americans to what we’re now calling “multi-Asian, multi-ethnic”.
Some of this is due to what I’ll label a leading from the Lord, some due
to observing the shifting grouping patterns of our core congregation as
well as the gradual broadening of a good portion of AAA Xns, who
apparently are growing weary of all this ‘just Chinese’ or ‘just AA’
ethnocentrism. And lo and behold, these past several months, we’ve been
picking up a growing number of IVCF students, many of whom are ‘these
type’ of AAAs, who recognize the kingdom values they’re getting on
campus. Coincidence? I don’t think so.

But I realize that we might be on the thin edge of the wedge as far as
AA churches go. I’m sure most ABC or OBC churches are poised for this
paradigm now or the near future. However, some of us are called to
pioneer this type of ministry, if for no other reason that there are
growing numbers of AAs who are looking for just such a church.
Interestingly enough, just like Dr. Yang stated, there are increasing
numbers of first gen. and second gen. Chinese coming to this new model!
Who coulda guessed? This model by no means we abandon our exploration
of various Asian cultures. In fact, I believe that having such a
diverse population actually makes it more imperative that we do our
homework, for Asians especially, but also for the other ethnic groups
who make up our new family.

’nuff for now.

Ken Fong
EBC-LA

— End —

From: JWongCDI@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 01:00:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: Rlfong@aol.com, cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: church plants

Hi Ron;

You asked about church plantings in Northern California. It’s pretty slim,
but here’s what I know about.

The initial ABC church planting events were done by Chinese Bible Evangel,
back in the mid-50’s. Under the leadership of a farm boy from Idaho, Rev.
Sen Wong begin planting ABC churches. The Oakland Chinese Bible Church
(today’s Bay Area Chinese Bible in San Leandro) was first, then came the SF
Bible Church, another one was started in Stockton (has closed), and then the
Chinese Gospel Mission was transformed into Chinese Grace Bible Church in
Sacramento. After that came Chinese Fellowship Bible Church in Belmont, the
Chinese Faith Bible in Fremont, and efforts is underway for one in San Ramone

I have watched this with amazement and interest, learning from his efforts
what works and what are not so good ideas, adding to my own ideas. His work
is largely ignored by the Evangelical community, because of his Separatist
stance. In spite of that, I must applaud what God has wrought through his
efforts.

The San Francisco Chinese Independent Baptist Church planted a couple of
churches in the late 70’s; Sunset Chinese Baptist and Marin Chinese Christian
(now Marin Community Christian) MCCC was an ABC effort, while Sunset Chinese
Baptist grew parallel ministries with “co-pastors.”

It’s a bit of information to encourage you as to what God has been doing here
in the Bay Area. Nor am I blind to the great neglects and handicaps still
confronting the growing of ABC ministries.

Joseph Wong
Church Dynamics International
SF Bau Area

— End —

Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 12:47:31 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: CAC_Mail: Job Opening

It has come to my attention that The First Chinese Baptist Church of San
Francisco is looking for a senior pastor. Their former pastor, the Rev.
Dr. Jeffrey Sharp, is going to be missionary in Hong Kong.

Bilingualism is preferred (but not required I think, since they already
have a pastor fo the Chinese-speaking ministries). Other qualities they
look for: MDiv, ordained, Am Baptist, ability to work in a multi-staff,
multi-congregation, bilingual, bicultural environment. “Individuals not
meeting all requirements, but who have a strong interest in serving the
church in this position, are _encouraged_ to apply.”

The application deadline is 24 Oct 97.

Please get in touch with Roger Tom, chair of search committee, directly;
all I have is the job description and I have no first-hand knowledge of
the church.

Dr. Roger Tom, Chair
Senior Pastor Search Committee
2280 Redwood Road
Hercules, CA 94547
rogertom@aol.com

Church address:
First Chinese Baptist Church of SF
1-15 Waverly Place
San Francisco, CA 94108
Tel: (415) 362-4139/4298
fax: (415) 362-7644
E-mail: fcbcsf@aol.com

Warmly,
Sze-kar

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 13:28:13 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Need Anne Lau’s email address

Greetings. Anne Lau asked me for the list of upcoming APA conferences, but I
lost her email address. Could she send me her email address so that I can
send her the list? Thanks. – Tim

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: drwong1@juno.com
Cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Politics
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 18:06:09 EDT

Dear Richard:

<>

As I mentioned, thx for this challenge, my Brother. Some thoughts:

…’incorporated’, an interesting word selection.This system we live in,
the only one I’ve really known, not only incorporates, it digests. Who
mentioned the Borg a while back 🙂 In the ‘ideal’ American World, in
reality, people are not allowed to live in peace, unincorporated, as
Swedish, Mexican, African, etc.; not allowed to be (as) God created.
These distinct peoples (treated like machine parts, trained for this role
in schools inc Seminaries) are gone. They lose their roots, despair in
the soul, and can’t seem to focus clearly on their Maker (e.g. what
language does ‘he’ speak? How long ago? As Sze-kar wisely raised in the
‘tour de force’, I believe: What is my/your/our purpose HERE)?

Reflecting also on Brother Sze-kar’s closing comment yesterday (and not
meaning to be excessively combative but informative), people are able to
organize within this system, e.g. as Teamsters, Church, CAC, but
definitely may not counter-organize. Some organizations inc the Communist
party try organizing Am. from within it, fail. Just ‘Unincorporated’ is
fine with me.

Do Jesus’ people gear into this (any) system? So much unlike Jesus in
this regard, ‘Church’ in this society renders itself tax-free (Yes, Jesus
paid his taxes). Protectors protected by what they protect, ‘Church’ is
highly organized, even rich, but Spiritually blind (to Jesus)–IMO,
because the ‘digestive’ system works.

e.g. ministry talk, focused on ministry, is VERY meaningful esp in the
case of CAC but can be babble in a country where ministry (focus) is
(part of) big business. Pls don’t take this wrong, I speak in love here:
It would be essential for business to have you wonderful and brilliant
people ‘babbling’. It’s like education in the school systems; I’m a
teacher. Ed/Ministry is millions of dollars spent systematically on
organization/property; results: a Spiritually bankrupt culture
politically oriented toward maintaining a grasp on/the vitality of
private enterprise/property and capitalism through organized ‘morality’.
(What is morality anyway? I think Sam Ling touched effectively on the
depth of this morass in his recent encyclical).

Evangelism is an economic proposition, too; winds up robbing Paul’s
church’s (giving units) to build Peter’s, vice versa. It produces church
hopping, not conversion (Col. 1:13).

Basically, Am. pans out as a situation about which/to which the prophets
like Jonah speak. We are institutions religious but blind to the living
God (cp. Eph 2:2). In the US, ‘Church’ has to do with embracing a tax
exempt god-system (and money machine) disguised in culture by lotsa lingo
in the spirit of (which?) Christ or anti-Christ..I tend to be sarcastic,
whatever. Pls forgive me if I wrongly offend anyone…I think it’s
correct, Richard, that a ‘challenge’ to such blindness from someone going
down this (digestive) tube sideways causes others who are loyal to the
system to become ‘defensive’. There’s plenty of evidence for this in
Scripture, too, e.g. in Matthew 23 when Jesus convicts his foes of murder
(the direction THAT sermon, not necessarily this one, takes). They do not
repent, they plot another murder! They never saw the alternative: a new
loyalty to the ‘Eye-opener’ (Jn. 9) who was soon to be murdered not only
‘by’/’for’ , but ‘because’ of them…The World system participated in it
then, participates now: IMO it repeats the murder of Jesus daily (see
Rev. 1:7); it digests Jesus/his loved ones one way or another. But, like
the big fish with Jonah, the system is free to regurgitate whatever it
can not stomach. If followers of Jesus are regurgitated and ‘Church’ is
not, so what. We live to preach/teach about it. Though absent from
‘Church’, we follow Jesus like Jonah (eventually:) to God.

All for now.

Best regards, Bro. G

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 14:46:04 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Porter Moves to Cut Off Bilingual Voting Funds

CACers:

I wonder how our recent discussions about the difficulties ABCs have in
Chinese churches connects with efforts like the following to cut off funds to
assist new immigrant voters. Because of length of article, I’m only
attaching the first paragraph. Please email me privately if you’d like the
entire article. Thanks. – Tim

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 14:48:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: why Asian American women don’t marry Asian American guys

CACers:

Min (Colorado College and associate for my Chinese American Christian
Oral-video history project) agreed to have the following posted. Your
comments are appreciated. – Tim
———————
Forwarded message:
From: kayak@uclink.berkeley.edu (F H Min Min L)
To: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: 97-09-19 21:05:29 EDT

Hi Tim

your list of suggestions were excellent
to Clarence Chuck at Wheaton…maybe I’ll write
him too.

on your uh oh topic..
Why Asian women don’t marry Asian men..that one phrased
like that always kind of bothers me and
to me I always see it as a comment from the perspective
of Asian men. We’ve had similar signs up at Berkeley
stuff like: “yo white boys give us back our women”
“Asian women belong to Asian men” and granted that
that is not what your topic states, but I think
almost implies that Asian women have some
“duty” to a racial group….also why isn’t there more oohs and
ahhs the other way when Asian men marry outside of the ethnic
group? Also, of my own small observations, many Asian females
have brothers who dated non-Asian females, and why is that not
a topic?

I suppose that topic as a flyer around campus would
certainly stir interest and curiousity, but I
think a topic that would address the questions
raised by your header would be something along the
lines of Interracial Marriages or Media Images of Asians
(which by the way both are topics I will be presenting
lectures to the community of Colorado Springs when I
return) To me, it would bother me (even if I wasn’t dating
Bob if I saw that title on a flyer of a Xn campus) It doesn’t
make things very complex…

anyway, just food for thought, I know you
were just presenting Chuck with interesting topics.

God’s blessings

Min

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:09:00 -0700
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Galations 3:28
From: ed.law@juno.com (Edmund K Law)

On Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Lawrence Lem
writes:

If I may, can I also remind you to be gentle in your
>responses to the CAC forum…Prov 15:1? 🙂
>

Yikes! (“Ai-Yah”) I re-read my response. I meant a generic “you” but I
can see how my sentence could be construed as a personal “you.” It was
unintentional. Sorry G. Thanks Larry for calling me on it!

Ed Law
Sacramento

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:18:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Fwd: AAASCommunity: Can I interview you?

Anyone want to volunteer and give a Christian perspective? – Tim
———————
Forwarded message:
From: yamagata@nunki.usc.edu (yamagata)
Sender: owner-aaascommunity@uclink4.berkeley.edu
To: AAASCommunity@uclink4.berkeley.edu
Date: 97-09-26 20:58:07 EDT

I am doing research for dissertation on current Japanese American college
students’ ethnic identity formation patterns.
My research questions are:
1. What is the relationship between Nikkei college students’ social
factors (e.g., birthplace, generation, travel, media, language, parenting
style, age, major, etc.) and other identity domains (e.g., gender,
politics, life-style, religion, recreation, friendship, dating), and
their ethnic identity formation.
2. How many formation patterns do they have? (I am wondering if previous
ethnic identity models emphasizing mainly on minority-majority polar
relationship and ethnic identity crisis are still suitable in the 1990s.)
3. Is it possible that their other identity domains are so important that
their ethnic identity is not a central issue any more?

In order to collect data, I need to interview twice with and give
a questionnaire to 50-60 Japanese-American college students.
Is it possible that I interview with you? I will go anywhere.
Thank you.

Yutaka Yamagata (Intercultural Education, USC)
yamagata@scf.usc.edu FAX 213-740-8646(USC)

================================================================
* AAASCommunity, the Discussion & News list of the
* Email Network of the Association for Asian American Studies
—————————————————————
* Coordinator:
================================================================

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:19:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Article for Sojourners curriculum

Dear CACers:

David Yoo (Claremont McKenna) and I have been working on an article for
Sojourner’s new curriculum on race relations. It is now in its second draft.
If you’d like to take a look and give us some feedback, please email me.
I’ll be away until Tuesday. Thanks! – Tim Tseng

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 23:33:24 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: TSTseng@aol.com
CC: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Need Anne Lau’s email address

After reading entries by you, Ling, Sze-Kar, etc., I definitely know my
gift isn’t scholarship!!! But if sharing my perspectives adds to the
richness of the mix, all the better.

I agree. This CAC thing is finally taking off. Boy, if you don’t keep
up, it’s easy to get swamped!!

One subject I’d like to see dialogue around in the future is that of
LEADERSHIP in the church. Been studying a lot about that lately and am
increasingly convinced that it’s the LACK of good and godly leadership
that’s to blame for the malaise of many ministries. This gets back to
good mentoring. But it takes one to make one!!!

peace.
ken.

— End —

From: JWongCDI@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 04:43:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Culture, our enemy

Warm Christian greetings;

I am grateful for you guys who are sharing their thoughtful perspectives
about culture. It forces me to clarify and consolidate my thoughts. Here
are some of them.

Since the Gospel is intent on changing the individual from the inside out, I
want to examine culture in the same way. That is, a modification of church
structures and practices is no more than “shuffling deck chairs.” The heart
of the people will re-create their environment according to their values and
ways. I confess with Romans 12, that the way a transformation of our church
life can take place lies in the renewing of the mind. Of course that must
come from Scripture, not our universities, nor our PhD’s/experts.

As implied in my earlier contribution, the problem in the Church is that NONE
of the cultures on earth are acceptable in God’s Kingdom, because our
thoughts and our ways are no where near God’s thoughts and ways. Whether a
culture is fluid and whether the individual is shifting in his cultural
mixture, does not alter that fact, the best of our culture is still no more
acceptable to God. Yes, culture, in any form, is our enemy.

Do we really need to do research on our/their culture? What do we hope to
find? The only cultural shifting desired is when the Christian is developing
a mindset matching God’s. As we discover God’s idea of good, believers are
to change the one given by their culture. That sure sounds simplistic. The
culture the Church wants and needs is the one that is described by God’s
Word. Let’s look and share what we’ve found.

So, for me, any intent on exegeting culture will be simply for the purpose of
identifying their error and the changes needed in our pursuit of righteous
living. (we must not be looking for some eclectic culture mix to form an
ideal, human culture) It is the major reason I encourage ABCs to minister to
ABCs. They are equipped to challenge through experience and an understanding
of the culture of the ABCs. Cross cultural ministry is possible, but much
more difficult. As Ken Fong suggests, the church leaders ARE tools for the
re-shaping of the members’ cultures. And as Peter Szto asserts, let’s “be
more self-consciously involved in the production of culture.” I think that
is CENTRAL in the concept of making disciples. And as Richard Wong implied,
is there any kind of labor more satisfying and significant? Be a pastor,
Yeaaa!!

However, as Ralph Winter (USCWM) pointed out, we all are handicapped by
cultural blind spots. That is, because we were raised in our culture, we do
not readily recognize the lies and fallacies, which masks as good and true,
in our culture. This problem is the “blessing” of a bi-cultural church.
Someone from a different culture would be ideally suited to spot those
cultural blind spots. To receive that blessing, we need to respect and trust
those in the other culture to serve us in that way. That requires a very
humble attitude towards my beloved culture and a passionate desire to
discover God’s thoughts and ways, but do-able. PTL!

This then is a viable model for bi-cultural ministry. The realization that a
brand new culture is to supplant the existing cultures in the church. And a
commitment to not use MY culture as the preferred culture, but the searching
of Scripture to discover the thoughts (values) and the ways (methods) of God.
This is also the UNITY of spirit the churches are seeking.

A personal note: My service with CDI is taking me to Chicago to serve as
Intentional Interim Pastor for 12 months. Leaving on Monday, I hope to make
new acquaintances, learn more about Chinese churches in the midwest, and be a
blessing.

Joseph C. Wong
CDI (Chinese Ministries)
San Francisco area

— End —

Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 09:00:30 -0500
To: cac@emwave.net
From: Gregory Jao
Subject: CAC_Mail: Culture, our enemy

Joseph Wong wrote:
>As implied in my earlier contribution, the problem in the Church is that NONE
>of the cultures on earth are acceptable in God’s Kingdom, because our
>thoughts and our ways are no where near God’s thoughts and ways…. Yes,
culture, in any form, is our enemy.

I would agree that no culture is acceptable in its totality in the Kingdom,
but I would also assert that some aspects of our culture may reflect Kingdom
values at some level. Recall the words of clause 10 of the Lausanne
Covenant, “Culture must always be tested and judged by Scripture. Because
man is God’s creature, some of his culture is rich in beauty and goodness.
Because he has fallen, all of it is tainted with sin and some of it is demonic.”

The difficulty, I think, with the statement “culture, in any form, is our
enemy” is that a culture-less church, society, or people cannot exist.

Biblically, I also hesitate from asserting that culture must be our enemy. I
agree that the Kingdom transforms many aspects of culture, but I see God
honoring human culture as well in the Incarnation, the gift of glossolalia,
and Paul’s incarnational approach in evangelism. Unlike Islam, for example,
Christianity does not mandate a single language for our official Scriptures.
We translate — and we translate with a passion because our model of
engagement includes an Incarnational aspect.

We engage in culture exegesis not only to critique (which is certainly
necessary) but also to capitalize on those aspects of culture which reflect
biblical values.

Greg Jao

(And, yes, Richard, I still receive (though I don’t always have time to
read) CAC. Howdy!)

— End —

From: NetBum7@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 20:59:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: In Search Of A Pastor…..

Hello everyone,

My name is Jonathan. As a proud member of the Orange County Chinese
Evangelical Church, I would like to ask all of you if you know or like to
apply for a English Pastoral candidate. We have been searching for that
“perfect” pastor yet not one has satisfied everyones expectations. If you
are someone that can speak English fluently and would love to hang out with
some teenagers, then you should probably leave me a note. We are located in
Irvine, California (the nation’s 2nd best city) along the coastal area.
Please email me back if you are interested in this position, we would really
love to hear from you!! Thanks and please keep us in your prayers!

In Him,

Jonathan Fu

— End —

From: SKYLeung@aol.com
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 16:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: PK’s SITG and Operation Hope

Fellow CACers,

For those of you coming to this coming Saturday’s Stand In The Gap assembly
in Washington DC, we in the DC area would like to extend a warm welcome. We
don’t want you to get the impression that PK and the Family Research Council
are the only folks welcoming you to our area. Your fellow CAC’ers also
hospitable!=)

If you or someone you know in your congregation or community of faith is
arriving early, I would like to bring to your attention a volunteer
opportunity. I believe it is called Operation Hope . It is a project
co-sponsored by PK for those joining its rally to contribute volunteer hours
on Friday, the 3rd of October, in refurbishing and renovating schools in the
District. For those who do not know, the schools in the District, like
others in many urban settings are in fairly poor states of repair. In fact,
schools in DC opened 3 weeks late this school year because of unresolved
problems impacting safety. This Friday, at 8:00 a.m., PK participants are
again meeting at the RFK Stadium parking lot to form working parties headed
to various city schools.

Why would I encourage and exhort those coming early to consider helping out?
There are several reasons, but the most compelling for me are these: 1) the
Washington Post and some of the other local press are now portraying SITG as
a big drain on the city’s resources and harping on the fact that PK will not
be obligated to pay certain fees because of the 1st Amendment status of its
SITG event; 2) Asians have been visibly absent in past events like these.

As for point number (1), without considering the economic boost that a large
gathering of people means to local businesses, those involved with PK in past
events have already proven valuable to the District’s finances by the number
of volunteer labor-hours put forth in good faith. Local businesses furnish
the supplies and equipment. The work done by the volunteers equates to
repairs that the schools don’t have to fund. The District’s school
superintendent definitely seemed appreciative last time. Anywho, it’s a good
chance to bear witness for the Lord. Last time, besides the chance to meet
other Christian men, different from me, I was moved by one “shining” moment
that is etched into my memory: African-american, Latino, and Caucasian men,
and one (?token?) Asian guy, holding hands and saying grace together in front
of some slightly stunned inner-city, school children (mostly boys) at the
beginning of our lunch break. I seriously doubt the children had witnessed
anything like that before.

As for point (2), there were two thousand volunteers who came to help at the
schools before the stadium event in DC this past spring. There are five
thousand expected this Friday. Last time, I surveyed the two thousand before
we boarded the buses to the schools and DID NOT find one other Asian in the
crowd of volunteers. Plenty of Asians showed at the stadium event, but none
at the service event. You can draw your own interpretations and conclusions.
Okay, I do wear glasses. But, I do pray there will be a more visible
showing this time.

Thanks for bearing with my long-windedness. Perhaps (doubtful), I will run
into some of you this weekend.

In the Redeemer,
Stephen Leung
Alexandria, VA
CCCVA, Falls Church

— End —

Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 20:56:23 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: CAC_Mail: Prestige of the Pastorate

A perspective on the low prestige Chinese culture places on ministers.

Before the 70s in Hong Kong and Taiwan, there was a stigma attached to
those who entered the ministry. They were perceived to be poor students
who couldn’t get into a “proper” college. Many came out of humble
backgrounds. Children from wealthier families were given a good
education and were expected to take up successful professions.

(This is great irony: studies have shown that, at least in Hong Kong,
elites came to be such THROUGH their connection to the church. Once
they reached the higher echelon, however, they don’t want their children
mired in the lowly profession that gave them the status in the first
place. The church is a stepping stone for many. I’ve seen this played
out time and again among pastor-kids. Though not rare, pastor-kids’
entering the ministry is definitely in the minority. It would be
interesting to have hard statistics on this.)

This situation is gradually changing, at least in Hong Kong where a
small group of very promising young people started in the mid-70s what
amounted to a movement of higher theological education. It has raised
the consciousness of church members and begun to make inroads outside
the church as well. This has yet to reach immigrant churches in this
country in any significant way, I don’t think.

Two resultant attitudes assoc. with this stigma: one is that in a
modernizing society, a non-profitable position like pastor is deemed
impractical. “What contribution do they make to society?” The other is
that people in the ministry must not be “smart” enough to do anything
else. These attitudes are still prevalent among immigrants, namely our
parents.

This is of course not entirely true. Mainline denominations actually
have very high academic and personal requirements for ministerial
candidates; their higher salaries commensurate with corresponding
expectations. But OBC churches in this country are by and large
non-denominational or are connected with traditionally low (liturgically
speaking) churches. Most mainline OBC churches do not seem to fare as
well as independent, local startup churches; if this is true, others
better informed (are you back yet, Tim?) would have to tell us why.
Traditionally, of course, we all know what a pivotal role the church and
in earlier times monasteries played in shaping western civilization.
Without such tradition or historical awareness, however, Chinese culture
continues to hold ministry in disdain.

ABC-ministry has unfortunately inherited many of these problems.

What can we do? I think it’s very hard if we tried to tough it out
individually. If we are honest with ourselves, we to a large extent
have internalized a good deal of these values. In a Chinese culture
that worships competence and success, who wouldn’t want to be known as
“smart” and “successful.” We need to combat the negativity not only
among our friends and relatives but also IN OURSELVES. We need to
remind each other who are in the same boat of our commitment to the
ministry, of our first love as it were. This is perhaps another appeal
to get organized.

Secondly, I think we also need to educate our congregations what
theological education is all about. They need to be taught what
theology is, what exegesis is good for and why, the rudiments of church
history, the theory and practice of pastoral ministry, etc.–so that
they have respect for the profession. It’s been my experience that
casual churchgoers are almost always awed by the complexity of the
discipline, and some are even challenged by it. I hope I’m not
advocating elitism; nor does it sound self-serving. A little rigor
never hurts anyone, and education could both raise their consciousness
and be an aid to their spiritual journey.

Sze-kar

— End —

Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 21:41:19 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Culture, our enemy

Greg Jao raises a valid objection to Joseph Wong’s portrayal of culture
as “our enemy,” in my estimation. Culture, like anything human, is a
given, it seems to me: being human means acquiring a mother tongue (and
perhaps a few step-mother tongues as well), being reared in a given
environment, being habituated into liking certain things and disliking
others, cultivating certain aspirations and dreams, etc. None of these
is value-free; all are human “products” (in Peter Szto’s sense). To
pretend none of these things matters seems impossible to me.

To say, then (to follow Joseph Wong’s logic), that culture is sinful is
saying both too much and too little: Too much, bc it glosses over what
some Reformers called “common grace,” goodness found in every culture
per God’s appointment; too little, bc it amounts to saying human beings
are sinful, which while true doesn’t seem to advance the current
discussion on ABC-ministry very much.

I would agree that Scripture must stand in judgment of culture. But as
Greg Jao observes, while there are biblical languages, they are
immediately relativized by the mandate that the Bible be translated into
the vernacular of its new home. There is no sacred or absolute culture,
as it were; but at the same time, the Bible would be unintelligible
without culture.

The incarnation, that God became a Jewish man who spoke Aramaic (and
probably Greek), defines the paradox for us: Absolute Truth chose and
continues to choose to reveal to us through relativistic cultural
vehicles. Even the Apostle Paul, when God revealed the Son to him,
expressed the experience and its consequences in Jewish terms (Gal
1.5-16). Paul wrote in Common Greek, using (and modifying)
well-established Hellenistic-Jewish epistolary forms, dealing with
mundane, oh-so-human problems like sex and marriage (1 Cor 6, 7)–all,
however, in the service of a transcendent ministry (2 Cor 3, 4).

Don’t misconstrue my argument here: I am NOT equating revelation to
culture. I am simply saying culture is a sine-qua-non condition for
understanding truth and revelation. To the extent we deny culture, to
that extent we fail to appreciate the particular obligations we’ve been
entrusted with in ABC-ministry; to the extent we deny our humanity, to
that extent we deny our Christian identity.

Respectfully,
Sze-kar

— End —

From: ArtZech46@aol.com
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:25:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: JLoFEC@aol.com
cc: cac@emwave.net, ArtZech46@aol.com
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-Americans in Ministry

Dear John, Thanks for stimulating this dialogue. I feel that we need to come
to a solution rather than ignore a huge problem that the Chinese church
faces, and many of the people we minister to also.

In a message dated 97-09-24 20:37:12 EDT, you write:

<>

<>

I think you are correct in assuming your guys will be spoiled. I interned in
an ABC church without a Chinese ministry and I was not prepared for the
reality of working in the typical Chinese church setting. Let me assume for
the sake of discussion that most churches with an opening for your people
graduating from seminary will be a church of about 150-200 people. It has an
OBC pastor and is looking for someone to work in the English department.
Maybe the board does everything in Chinese. There are few if any adults.
The English ministry will be primarily “youth ministry.” (This describes
the church I was at in my first year.)

I think this describes about 80-90% of the available positions out there.
So, how would you prepare them?
1) They have to be prepared to do cross-cultural ministry. How do
missionary organizations prepare people for going overseas?
a) Seminars & teaching on the culture they will be immersed in. (Hoover
Wong teaches a class on that in Fuller)
b) Somehow forcing them to do a short internship at a really “Chinese” type
church. (3-6 months)
c) Having them meet with and hear the reality of ministry in the Chinese
church from guys like us.
d) Psycological & personality testing. Sometimes the person needs to know
himself better.

I think the key word here is REALITY CHECK. They need to see how the real
world will be. Not to scare them, but just to know what they will face.
Consider how soldiers are prepared for battle. Boot camp, simulations,
exercises. Not that the Chinese church is the enemy, but a soldier is
prepared for the worst so he will survive and be victorious. Too many of us
ABC’s have been ill prepared for the “battle” we face. Part of it is
spiritual, some of it is human, some of it is part of ministry.

It would be ideal to have some protected place of ministry for guys to get
ready before they go out. There may be a few large churches equipped to do
that. Otherwise you are on your own, in my opinion. There was definitely
not any terrarium for me in 1986 when I graduated from seminary.

Let me offer a few practical suggestions. Maybe we can collaborate with some
people.
1) Get a couple of us to give an annual seminar to graduating ABC
seminarians. They can hear in person what we go through and how to cope.
2) Publish a newsletter or booklet with articles to give to all these ABC
and other Asian Am seminary graduates. Kind of like a survival guide to
working in the Chinese Am or Asian Am church.
3) Locate churches with people in ministry who have the experience to intern
or mentor guys before they head out.

Give me your feedback on my ideas. I’d like to see someone develop something
for those headed for the front lines. Maybe there is something out there I
am not aware of.

For the Kingdom,
Rev. Arthur Lum
Chinese Church in Christ
San Jose, CA (Silicon Valley)

— End —

Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 03:18:17 -0700
From: ohbrudder
To: cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: my ten cent

At the risk of imitating the rude guy butting in on a cocktail party
conversation, I am injecting my ten cent worth . . . a week after DJ
signed me up for this CAC. I haven’t decided whether to thank him yet.

WHERE I AM COMING FROM. An ABC who has pastored and otherwise served in
the Chinese church for over 25 years . . .have led hundreds to faith in
Christ over the years . . .built up 4 ABC groups from under 20 to over
100 (one to about 60 and another to over 250, others to over 110). I’m
not bragging . . .just trying to give you all perspective as from where
I’m speaking and hopefully a little credibility to what I say.

A BIT ABOUT CULTURE. I think dissecting culture as it relates to ABC
ministry effectiveness is majoring in a minor. It is science with an
evolutionist mentality . . .a psychologist attributing every problem to
the environment. I believe the bigger key is our Christology . . .that
is the way we perceive Christ and his actual role in building His
church. . .the kind of Christ we perceive and imitate, etc. The culture
issue tends to relegate God to a disinterested distance . . .while we
may think that understanding and solving the cultural differences will
solve ABC/OBC ministry problems. For myself, an awareness of the
cultural differences is enough. . . I do not need to know every facet
and nuance before I can be effective as a minister. (I’ve ministered in
a Formosan church, Mandarin church and Cantonese church.)

AN IMPORTANT KEY TO A SUCCESSFUL ABC ministry in an OBC church: an OBC
pastor who is secure and aware of the ABC “creature.” Some of you have
mentioned mentoring and leadership . . .this is in the ballpark.
Let me throw out some names of “great OBC” pastors to whom I am forever
indebted and owe my success and fit in this category: Dr. Felix Liu,
Rev. John Shiao, Dr. Anthony So, Dr. Ernest Chan. They are all humble
men of God; they recognized their inadequacies and trust God’s gifting
in me to minister to their ABCs. I can’t do what they do . . .however,
they can’t do what I do. We had this understanding. I know many of you
know these prominent Chinese pastors in the Chinese church and other men
like them.

Getting verbose . . .out!

Bill Leong

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 19:23:18 -0600
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Prestige of the Pastorate
From: gdot@juno.com (G Ottoson)

If to people *ministry* ever means ‘faithful emissary of Jesus’ it will
be because of those who choose to follow Him in faith, in culture, in
conflict, AND in much love. Sze-kar, your (wise, gentle) perspective
(below) and love for people should be mine, too..still considering some
issues, e.g.:

*ministry* takes the Holy Spirit’s approach to Satan, who is also
incarnate in a way, is present in our culture(s), people, govt’s, and
institutions. We read how God (incarnate) hammered Satan (‘incarnate’);
how this confrontational ‘ministry’ shaped the NT (~35 references in 32
NT verses) and anchors the Kingdom of God in hostile places; and

*ministry* takes the Holy Spirit’s approach to the Lord’s followers. e.g.
apparently the first thing the disciples said after Jesus’ scathing
sermon in Matthew 23 was the comment to him about the beauty of the
Temple stones. But the Lord was so gracious to these guys…loving his
followers so they can get beyond their fascination with religion,
buildings. I need to be loving like this.

**profession**..hmm…as professing faith in Jesus through the Spirit in
the (organized) World?

…time to do some fishing..I’ve been thinking about going…no, Richard,
not off the coast of Ninevah:)

G

— End —

To: cac@emwave.net
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 21:34:30 -0600
Subject: CAC_Mail: FYI
From: gdot@juno.com (G Ottoson)

———- Forwarded message ———-
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 09:24:06 -0700
From: Gilles Poitras
To: ATLA Electronic Discussion
Subject: Re: Sacred texts

>Would you please post to ATLA what you sent in response to the query
>about sacred texts?

All I sent was some information about what kind of links we had here on
our
web pages. We have no single page for such texts but tend to spread them
about in the subject pages that are most appropriate.

Bible texts linked on the Bible pages.

Buddhist texts on the various Buddhist pages etc.

Demoninational documents are sometimes linked to on the denominational
resource pages, of which we have quite a few given the nature of the GTU.

On our home page, http://www.gtu.edu/library/ we have a search engine
which
can be used to search for the word TEXT which will turn up a list of
pages
with that word, most of these pages have links to texts on them.

+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Gilles Poitras gpoitras@gtu.edu
Reference Department Graduate Theological Union Library
2400 Ridge Road Berkeley, California, USA
http://www.gtu.edu/library/
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

— End —

From: Nsoulpkim@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 20:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
To: SKYLeung@aol.com, cac@emwave.net
Subject: CAC_Mail: Washington DC

hiCACers, for those of you who are attending the stand in the Gap event in
Washington DC, I wanted to invite you to check out our christian music event
the night before. here is the information. if you have any questions or
would like a guest pass, feel free to email me.

NSOUL Records and Bright & Morning Star Productions Presents:
__________________
______________________________/ _____ |
| _ / ____| _ |
| (_) _ __ _ __ ___ _ __ | | __ | | ___ |
| | || ‘_ \ | ‘_ \ / _ \| ‘__|| | |_ || | / _ \ |
| | || | | || | | || __/| | | |__| || || (_) | |
| |_||_| |_||_| |_| \___||_| \_____||_| \___/ |
|_________________________________________________|
http://www.erols.com/neight/innerglo/

___Verse____________________________________________
“We have the word of the prophets made more certain,
and you will do well to pay attention to it,
as to a light shining in a dark place,
until the day dawns and the morning star
rises in your hearts.” -Simon Peter

___Description________________________
Stomping beats dynamically mixed under
the influence of Jesus Christ

___Location____________________________
Less than an hour from DC and Baltimore
in Hagerstown, Maryland

___Date________________________________________
October.Third.Nineteen.Hundred.And.Ninety.Seven

___Time_____________
10pm – BrightMorning

___Visuals_______________________________________________
The Latest in Intelligent Lighting By: Let there be Light

___Audio_____________________________________________
Massive Structural Vibrations By: Sound Reinforcement

___Technicians______________________________
DJ Scott Blackwell (New York, NSOUL Records)
DJ AJ MORA (Los Angeles, Groove Radio, Powertools, Aquaboogie)
DJ’s Derrek & Greg (DC, Hit Home Crew)
DJ NightLight (Baltimore)
and more…

___Cost__
Ten Bucks

___Info_____________________________________________
web…………http://www.erols.com/neight/innerglo/
email……….n8@beloved.com
info line……301.293.4442
my voicemail…301.371.9352

__Directions__________________________
From Baltimore take Interstate 70 west
From DC take 270 to Interstate 70
Go 70 west towards Hagerstown past the Hagerstown exits
till you get to Interstate 81 going North
Follow 81 Northbound for a few minutes and then
get off on exit 6A Hagerstown
At first Traffic light take a right onto Western Maryland Parkway
The first stop sign is at W. Washington – Go straight through…
The location is on the Right.

— End —

Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 23:44:22 -0700
From: ohbrudder
To: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: my ten cent

Bless you Clarence. I do sense your heart for the ABC souls of your
generation.
May the Lord raise you up to win many. Maybe the Lord is raising you up
along sociological/anthropological lines to prepare you for His
harvest. I’ve
given up long ago trying to figure out God. Just when we think we have
Him
figured out, He does it differently . . . always the best way. Not the
way we
might have or would have done it, but His way. So maybe God is leading
you
differently than He led me.

I do believe culture and Christianity is intricately connected. But this
is not the
same as saying I believe the success of ABC ministries depends upon our
understanding of cultural issues. In my experience, culture issues never
stopped
me from winning an ABC to Christ nor an ABC from receiving Christ. My
Christology tells me that Jesus loves and wants the ABC more than me.
The
Lord led the ABC to me or my congregation and that is all I need to have
the
confidence I can win Him for Christ. I let all the believers of my
church know
that if they bring any non-believer to church, he will become a believer
within
two months or he will leave. . . I think most of the time it was one
month.

When I was about 20 like yourself . . . almost 30 years ago . . . I was
not
aware of the great ABC/OBC dichotomy—only the Chinese and “white
ghost”.
I started an afternoon Sunday School in Alhambra (suburb of LA) with
11 kids and built it to over 100 in 5 months.

About that time, I received this from the Lord:
He said, “Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; they are already
white ready for harvest.” But the vision He gave me to see was it was
YELLOW, not WHITE! Since then, the burden for ABCs never left. But
why ABCs and not all Chinese? I grew up finding “FOB’s” odd. We called
OBCs, “FOBs” (Fresh On Board or Fresh Off the Boat) back then. They
just for some sovereign reason weren’t actively part of my world.

It was many years later at Fuller in an Asian American ministry class
given by a Japanese professor – – –
I don’t even remember his name it’s been so long ago- – – that I became
more aware of the different Asian generational differences and problems.
I’m trying to point to the Christology that preceded any definitive
cultural
awareness in my experience. That as a pragmatic priority, culture
issues
took a back seat . . . in the trunk actually. Heck, thru these years, I
even
plead ignorant to understanding the cultures of the Boomers and the
Generation Xers . . . too much, just can’t keep up. Never felt the need
to.
Only to be aware. I think most ABCs relate to and listen to me
merely because I’m one of them and because I’m from Him.

And of this I am positive: I know in the most intimate way, to the
deepest
part of me that “God love me.” And I still don’t fully understand
myself
and still learning about myself. I know God loves me because of the
witness of His Spirit with my spirit; the witness of Christ and the
witness
of His Word. I heard Him tell me, I felt Him comfort me, I saw His
provision and guidance . . . and worst of all, I felt his rod of
discipline!
I KNOW God’s love because I know His grace . . . having been sifted,
and failed more than once . . . I truly, truly know His grace.

In a side note: In my days at Fuller, wondering if any ABC felt about
ABCs as I did, I met Greg Owyang. He was a pioneer ABC minister;
he was (all the stuff I wasn’t) handsome, intelligent, talented, young,
godly . . .in most people’s mind, the perfect leader for winning ABCs
for Christ. Then he was suddenly killed. Why did God allow it? Why
raise him up and take him before the job was done? Many other
questions. Like I said, I cannot figure out God’s ways; I just know He
loves ABCs and I trust Him.

Bill Leong

— End —

Posts in Sept 1997 a

Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 23:12:07 -0500
To: cac@bccn.org, acmi-network@xc.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: emwave_test: A prayer on behalf of the Bride of Christ

Dear Lord Jesus Christ, head of the Church,

You want to receive a bride
on that glorious day,
pure, beautiful, clean,
not on the outside,
but on the inside.

But we live in an image-conscious world,
hungry for pictures,
power,
gossip,
success.

Forgive us for following
a world of
image, publicity,
and pride.
Humble us to know that
the way of the cross
is not always glamorous.
Teach us to
glory in that
old, rugged cross.
And I will cherish that
old, rugged cross.

Lord, Your people continue to reach out
to youth,
young adults,
internationals,
students,
hearts hungry for mercy,
minds searching for truth.
Bless each one of them.
Encourage each of your servants
in the depths of their hearts.

Bless Prince William
who has decided to follow You —
and his brother Harry.
May they know in the
deepest recesses of their soul
that
there is One who
truly cares
when the cameras are there
and when they go home.
Be their strength and shelter.

May England rediscover her God.

Bless all the students, teachers
and educators
as they start a hectic new year.
Guard our minds
that we may think thoughts
after Your will.

Be merciful to our inhumane,
barbaric world, O Lord of glory!
If You tarry, Lord Jesus,
be gracious to humankind,
that the gospel may yet go forth
and increase.

May we learn to be
pure, beautiful and clean,
not on the outside,
but within.
Your servants stand waiting
for Your commission.
Cleanse us!

Through Jesus Christ our Lord,
Amen.

September 1, 1997
Written after watching 3 hours (!) of
TV coverage on Princess Diana’s death

— End —

Date: Tue, 02 Sep 1997 12:30:58 -0500
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: CAC_Mail: Listserver

Dear DJ:

I speak for all when I say we are enormously grateful for your untiring
effort managing the CAC-discussion. Having spent some time doing it by
hand–largely unsuccessfully–I can attest to the vast improvement of
automation.

I am just curious, however, what form the “moderated” discussion might
take. If it is moderated to deal with technical matters like
subscribing and unsubscribing, that could be helpful towards
streamlining the postings. But will we lose spontaneity and risk
layering an editorialization that might fetter free discussion? Just a
few questions.

Warmly,
Sze-kar

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 20:00:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: FWD: The World’s Retirement Home?

CACers:

I guess it’s time to complain about those burdensome Asian welfare
grannies… – Tim Tseng

========

The World’s Retirement Home?
Immigrants Check Their Folks into Welfare Havens

Investor’s Business Daily, August 21, 1997

By David A. Price

Social worker Greta Heinemeier is frustrated. She wants to find places for
needy seniors in a public housing complex in the well-to-do Silicon Valley
town of Cupertino, Calif. But there’s a long waiting list.

The problem: Some 40% of the residents in the complex are the parents of
monied Taiwanese immigrants.

Their sons and daughters brought them into the US under laws that allow
unlimited immigration of citizens’ parents. The children simply had to
promise the Immigration and Naturalization Service that their folks wouldn’t
become public charges.

Yet they’re now in subsidized housing and getting welfare checks.

“I really would like to provide housing for people who need it,” said
Heinemeier, admissions coordinator for the complex.

It’s not an isolated case. Across the nation. more and more elderly
immigrants — mostly the parents of immigrants already here — are coming to
the U.S. And they’re drawing from generous welfare programs: Medicaid,
housing, Supplemental Security income.

Because they’ve paid little or nothing in U.S. taxes, these older immigrants
— though living here legally — are a drain on taxpayers, critics charge.
One study puts the lifetime cost of cach new elderly immigrant at roughly
$150,000.

And that cost adds up fast. In fiscal ’96, nearly 67.000 people 60 or older
came to the country legally. That accounts for more than 7% of all
immigrants let in. Almost 22,000 were 70 or older.

Critics want to make it harder for old aliens to come in and get on the dole.

“Where there are sponsors who can afford to take care of these people, they
should be living up to their responsibility,” said Rosemary Jenks of the
Center for Immigration Studies, a group that favors tighter immigration
control. “It’s not up to American taxpayers to pay for people who come here.”

Congress tried to tighten the rules. The ’96 welfare reform law cut
noncitizens off from federal welfare benefits. But this year’s budget deal
restored all benefits but food stamps to all immigrants — young or old —
already living in the U.S.

Immigrant-rights groups don’t think that’s enough. In addition, they want
those seniors brought over by their children in the future to be eligible.

“I would hope that Congress, along with the advocate community. will work to
find ways to provide some kind of safety net for these elderly and frail
individuals,” said Yvonne Lee of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission.

The revised law restores SSI benefits to some 360,000 elderly immigrants
here. SSI — intended for the aged, blind and disabled — is the main cash
welfare program used by older aliens. It’s also the fastest-growing federal
entitlement

>From ’86 to ’94, the number of legal aliens — elderly or otherwise — on
SSI grew an average of 15% per year. In contrast, the program overall grew
only 5% over the same period, says the General Accounting Office. By late
’95, the GAO found, immigrants accounted for almost one-third of the elderly
on SSI, up from less than 6% in 1982.

The benefits aren’t small change. The top federal monthly payment is $470
for an individual or $705 for couple. And all but seven states add payments
on top of that. Those on SSI qualify for Medicaid as well.

Over the next five years the federal cost of elderly immigrants on SSI and
Medicaid will total more than $7 billion, the Congressional Budget Office
says. That doesn’t count the money states kick in.

But Lee says that the rise in the number of immigrants on welfare programs
grams is not a sign of abuse.

For example, Chinese use of SSI climbed in the ’80s. But that was due to a
federal outreach program to let immigrants know about the benefits, Lee says.

“If the government is telling you that you are eligible, some people do
apply” Lee said. “They are not committing an kind of crime.”

Still, immigrants who come to the U S. as seniors go on welfare at a high
rate. More than a third of immigrants over 65 who had been sponsored for
entry between ’80 and ’87 were on welfare in ’90, Norman Matloff of the
University of California at Davis found.

And, on average, older immigrants cost more.

Young immigrants may need public education and other tax-funded benefits.
But over their lifetimes they will tend to pay taxes that more than offset
those costs, according to a recent National Academy of Sciences report.

Older aliens, on the other hand, are net burdens.

The crossover point from net benefit to net burden is around age 41,
according to the NAS study. That is, immigrants who are older than 41 when
they enter the U.S. are likely to pay less in state and federal taxes over
their life times than they use in public services.

Each immigrant who comes here a age 60 costs taxpayers an average of nearly
$150,000. the study found.

Federal law on the issue has gone through twists and turns in the past year.

Children and other close relatives usually sponsor elderly immigrants who
enter the U.S. Before ’96, those immigrants normally couldn’t get on SSI
for their first five years here. That’s because their sponsors’ incomes were
considered as part of their SSI applications.

The sponsors had to sign a pledge that the immigrant “will not become a
public charge in the United States.” But that pledge, according to the
courts, was not binding.

The ’96 welfare reform law, however, banned legal immigrants from getting
SSI, Medicaid and food stamps until they became citizens. In signing the
law, President Clinton pledged to “correct” these provisions — and in the
latest budget agreement, he was true to his word.

Just the added cost of grandfathering those elderly immigrants on the SSI
rolls is $1.9 billion a year, says Philip Gambino of the Social Security
Administration.

Immigrants entering after Aug 22 of last year are still barred from the
program until they become citizens. Yet it’s too earIy to tell whether the
legal changes will reduce the flow of those immigrants joining the weflare
rolls.

Matloff says there’s little practical difference.

For example, before the change, a new immigrant had to wait five years until
his sponsor’s income was no longer considered as part of his SSI application.

Now, immigrants simply have to wait a bit more than five years to be
naturalized. Then they can apply for SSI.

True, sponsors’ pledges of support are now binding under ’96 immigration
law. But that duty expires once the immigrant naturalizes.

Two other changes might have a broader effect.

Immigrants not already on the rolls have to show they’re disabled to qualify
for SSI. But disability is broadly defined, making it relatively easy to
qualify, skeptics say. For instance, alcoholics and drug addicts now qualify
for SSI payments under the Americans With Disabilities Act of ’90.

And immigrants can’t get on Medicaid until they’re naturalized. The wait for
Medicaid used to be only a year. That longer wait might slow elderly
immigration.

**

Table: Who’s A Problem? More Asian aliens become public charges than
Hispanics

% of recent immigrants over 65 on welfare

37% All immigrants
34% Sponsored immigrants
47% From China, Hong Kong, Taiwan
41% From Philippines
28% From Iran
50% From Korea
18% From Mexico
50% From USSR
65% From Vietnam

Source: Census Bureau, 1990 Survey

————————————————————————–
Mark Krikorian, executive director
Center for Immigration Studies
1522 K St. N.W., Suite 820, Washington, DC 20005-1202
(202) 466-8185 (phone); (202) 466-8076 (fax)
msk@cis.org http://www.cis.org/cis
————————————————————————–

— End —

From: AsianPK@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 01:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Asian Promise Keepers News Items

Promise Keepers hosted its first ever conference aimed at Asian American men
several weeks ago. About 800 men attended this conference held in Nor
California featuring an all Asian worship team and seven Asian speakers.
Audio tapes are available from this conference for $5 each. If you order
the entire set of seven tapes, you can choose an extra tape as a bonus. Here
is a list of the seven messages:
1. David Gibbons – Good News
2. Wayne Ogimachi – Self Esteem
3. Louis Lee – purity
4. Ken Fong – career
5. Jeff Louie – family
6. Bruce Fong – small groups
7. Keith Young – reconciliation

Orders will be filled when we receive your check made out to “MESA”
(Ministries for English Speaking Asians, a small para church ministry that
is handling these tape orders). Please send orders to 16089 Penn Ave. San
Lorenzo CA 94580 The cost of $5 per tape includes shipping and handling.

Some of you may be interested in participating in the Washington DC event on
Saturday, October 4 that Promise Keepers is calling “Stand In The Gap.” This
six hour program (noon to 6pm) will primarily be a time for Christian men
from all over this nation to gather to repent of individual and corporate sin
as well as to pray for our nation.

If you or any other Asian Christians from anywhere in the nation are planning
to participate in SITG on 10/4 and possibly are in need of lodging, please
contact Mr. Geoff Wong, a lay leader at an Asian church near DC who may be
able to help with such a need. His email address is gswong1852@juno.com.

Please contact me if you have any questions concerning SITG.

Thanks!

Louis Lee

— End —

Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 07:37:42 -0700
To: cac@bccn.org
From: Tom Steers
Subject: CAC_Mail: Prayer warriors

To all Asian American pastors or parachurch workers:

Qusetion: Is prayer or intercession one of your top concerns?

There is going to be a meeting in L.A. Jan. 19-20 of Asian American pastors
and parachurch leaders sponsored by the Asian Task Force of the U.S.
Spiritual Warfare Network.

It will be a time of prayer, relating/networking, and discussing prayer
strategies to win the lost Asian Americans in North America.

If you would like more info please contact: Tom at

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 22:40:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: jql@earthlink.net, cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: Denny’s Web Site – http://www.dennysinc.com

Jeff:

In a message dated 9/3/97 2:15:10 PM, you wrote:

<>

First, do you work for or own a Denny’s franchise? If so, I can understand
you interest in this matter and perhaps a desire to see resolution. Here are
some of my thoughts….

1. I’ve looked at the Denny’s web-page and agree with most people that they
are doing a good job of trying to resolve this incident. The irresponsible
people have been fired and punished. So, like the Texaco case (and Denny’s
case a year ago), it is good to see corporations responding quickly to acts
of racial discrimination.

2. However, I also noticed that in Denny’s president John Romandetti’s letter
of apology, he expressed “disappointment” that the victims (now including the
African Americans who helped the Asians) had decided to file suit. He said
that Denny’s offered to pay for the medical bills, yet the plaintiff’s
counsel recommended that they not contact Denny’s. At this point, I have to
admire Denny’s for their public relations expertise, yet caution observers
from concluding that the plaintiffs are a group of money hungry opportunists
(the impression that Denny’s appears to be trying to paint). Apologies,
paying one’s medical bills and acting swiftly to punish the discriminators
are helpful acts, but so far as I know, justice will not be served unless
there is some form of compensation by Denny’s. It is also unwise for the
plaintiffs to negotiate this directly with Denny’s without legal counsel. If
you’ve ever been a victim of racial discrimination (and know it), monetary
compensation alone cannot undo the damage done. I certainly hope that
whatever settlement Denny’s reaches with the victims will not be interpreted
in a manner which shifts the burden of blame to the victims.

3. Finally, there also must be a place for resolution/forgiveness. Once the
settlement is resolved, I would hope that Asian American activists and the
victims will go on record that they have reached satisfactory resolution. I
don’t think it helps to continue to scapegoat Denny’s – after all, what
happened in Syracuse is really a symptom of the larger social problem of
racism. If the victims and other persons hurt by this incident really want
to make a difference, they should afterwards engage in ways of providing
justice for all people. For me, I believe that one of the most untapped
places for strength to stand against the demonic presence (which causes all
kinds of forms of oppression) is in the church – and in evangelicalism, in
particular (provided that we evangelicals get beyond our tunnel vision about
the mission of the church).

I’ve had a couple of negative experiences at a Denny’s and probably would not
go there as a first choice. But, it is good to know that they are working
towards a solution – something that many other companies are ignoring (or
shall continue to ignore until something as blatant happens to them).

What do you think?

Tim

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
RES: (716) 473-2651 [until mid-Sept]
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: SKYLeung@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 00:56:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Subject from soc.culture.asean Newsgroup

I found this thought-provoking (a rare event among most newsgroups) for a
variety of reasons. Sorry for this long post. I’d attach it as a file that
all could selectively download if i knew how. Any suggestions FFR?

Stephen Leung
Alexandria, VA
_________

Subject: TIME TO BALANCE HUMAN RIGHTS WITH RESPONSIBILITIES
From: myanmar@twics.com (Myanmar.)
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 12:20:51 GMT
Message-id:

THE JAPAN TIMES (1 9 97)

TIME TO BALANCE HUMAN RIGHTS WITH RESPONSIBILITIES

By SHIGEO SHIMADA

Staff writer

The InterAction Council, a group of former heads of state and
government from nearly 30 countries, will propose that the United
Nations adopt a Universal Declaration of Human
Responsibilities to foster responsibility and obligations to
complement human rights.

The council is submitting the proposal, accompanied by a draft
declaration, to U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, and urging the
world body to adopt a resolution on human obligations
next year to mark the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, according to its Tokyo based secretariat.

The draft declaration consists of a preamble and 19 articles, which
provide for fundamental principles for humanity, nonviolence and
respect for life, justice and solidarity, truthfulness
and tolerance, mutual respect and partnership.

Through its members, the group is calling on the governments of U.N.
member states to endorse and sponsor the proposed declaration.

The InterAction Council was established in 1983 by former presidents
and prime ministers to mobilize their experience, expertise and
international relationships to stimulate action on long term global
issues.

Its members include former Japanese Prime Minister Kiichi Miyazawa,
former French President Valery Giscard d’Estaing, former U.S.
President Jimmy Carter, former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm
Fraser, former British Prime Minister James Callaghan, former
German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt and former Singapore Prime Minister
Lee Kuan Yew. They meet annually for what is popularly called the “OB
summit.”

The draft declaration is based on a report prepared for the council by
a group of 20 experts from religious and other fields chaired by
Schmidt.

The council has been discussing the problem of human obligations and
human rights since 1987 in a search for universal ethical standards so
that all people can live together peacefully.

In its opinion, human rights and freedoms must be balanced by
responsibility and duty. It also believes that there will be no
better global order without a global ethical structure.

Noting that many societies have traditionally conceived of human
relations in terms of obligations rather than rights, it says that the
concepts of freedom and individuality have traditionally been
emphasized in the West, while the notions of responsibility and
obligation have been stressed in most Eastern civilizations.

The group says the Universal Declaration of Human Rights reflects the
philosophical and cultural background of its Western drafters, and it
is necessary to balance the notions of freedom and responsibility.

The concept of human obligation balances the notions of freedom and
responsibility; while rights relate more to freedom, obligations are
associated with responsibility, according to the council.

Freedom and responsibility are interdependent, and people should
develop their sense of responsibility to use correctly their freedom,
it says.

The group also believes that a proper balance between freedom and
responsibility is necessary. Unrestricted freedom is as dangerous as
imposed social responsibility. Serious social injustices
have resulted from extreme economic freedom and capitalist greed.

The group says that in a world transformed by globalization, common
ethical standards are needed for business, political authorities and
nations as well as for individuals, if we are to address global issues
such as violence on television, speculation in financial markets and
the growing influence of private tycoons.

The initiative also attempts to reconcile antagonistic ideologies,
beliefs and political views.

Endorsing the proposal, Miyazawa told The Japan Times that it reflects
a growing awareness across the world that all people must be
responsible for the peace, security and future of the
world in economic, environmental, health and other terms.

All nations, corporations and individuals must share in these
responsibilities to ensure the well being and happiness of all people,
he said.

The U.N. should declare human responsibilities to complement and
strengthen the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the occasion
of its golden jubilee, Miyazawa added.

The council lists the following obligations as a necessary complement
to human rights:

– If we have a right to life, then we have the obligation to
respect life.

– If we have a right to liberty, then we have the obligation to
respect other people’s liberty.

– If we have a right to security, then we have the obligation to
create the conditions for every human being to enjoy human security.

– If we have a right to partake in our country’s political process
and elect our leaders, then we have the obligation to participate
and ensure that the best leaders are chosen.

– If we have a right to work under just and favorable conditions to
provide a decent standard of living for ourselves and our
families, we also have the obligation to perform to the best
of our capacities.

– If we have a right to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion, we also have the obligation to respect other’s thoughts
or religious principles.

– If we have a right to be educated, then we have the obligation to
learn as much as our capabilities allow and, where possible,
hare our knowledge and experience with others.

– If we have a right to benefit from the Earth’s bounty, then we
have the obligation to respect, care for and restore the Earth and
its natural resources.

The text of the council proposed draft Universal Declaration of Human
Responsibilities reads as follows:

THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RESPONSIBILITIES

PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the
foundation of freedom,justice and peace in the world and
implies obligations or responsibilities,

Whereas the exclusive insistence on rights can result in conflict,
division, and endless dispute, and the neglect of human
responsibilities can lead to lawlessness and chaos,

Whereas the rule of law and the promotion of human rights depend on
the readiness of men and women to act justly,

Whereas global problems demand global solutions which can only be
achieved through ideas, values, and norms respected by all cultures
and societies,

Whereas all people, to the best of their knowledge and ability, have a
responsibility to foster a better social order, both at home and
globally, a goal which cannot be achieved by laws,
prescriptions, and conventions alone,

Whereas human aspirations for progress and improvement can only be
realized by agreed values and standards applying to all people and
institutions at all times,

Now, therefore, The General Assembly proclaims this Universal
Declaration of Human Responsibilities as a common standard for all
peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every
organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall
contribute to the advancement of communities and to the enlightenment
of all their members. We the peoples of the world thus renew and
reinforce commitments already proclaimed in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: namely, the full acceptance of
the dignity of all people; their inalienable freedom and equality, and
their solidarity with one another. Awareness and acceptance of these
responsibilities should be taught and promoted throughout the world.

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES FOR HUMANITY

Article 1

Every person, regardless of gender, ethnic origin, social status,
political opinion, language, age, nationality, or religion, has a
responsibility to treat all people in a humane way.

Article 2

No person should lend support to any form of inhumane behavior, but
all people have a responsibility to strive for the dignity and self
esteem of all others.

Article 3

No person, no group or organization, no state, no army or police
stands above good and evil; all are subject to ethical standards.
Everyone has a responsibility to promote good and to avoid evil
in all things.

Article 4

All people, endowed with reason and conscience, must accept a
responsibility to each and all, to families and communities, to races,
nations, and religions in a spirit of solidarity: What you do
not wish to be done to yourself, do not do to others.

NONVIOLENCE AND RESPECT FOR LIFE

Article 5

Every person has a responsibility to respect life. No one has the
right to injure, to torture or to kill another human person. This does
not exclude the right of justified self defense of individuals or
communities.

Article 6

Disputes between states, groups or individuals should be resolved
without violence. No government should tolerate or participate in
acts of genocide or terrorism, nor should it abuse
women, children, or any other civilians as instruments of war. Every
citizen and public official has a responsibility to act in a peaceful,
nonviolent way.

Article .7

Every person is infinitely precious and must be protected
unconditionally. The animals and the natural environment also demand
protection. All people have a responsibility to protect the air,
water and soil of the Earth for the sake of present inhabitants and
future generations.

JUSTICE AND SOLIDARITY

Article 8

Every person has a responsibility to behave with Integrity, honesty
and fairness. No person or group should rob or arbitrarily deprive
any other person or group of their property.

Article 9

All people, given the necessary tools, have a responsibility to make
serious efforts to overcome poverty, malnutrition, ignorance and
inequality. They should promote sustainable development all over the
world in order to assure dignity, freedom, security and justice for
all people.

Article 10

All people have a responsibility to develop their talents through
diligent endeavor; they should have equal access to education and to
meaningful work. Everyone should lend support to the
needy, the disadvantaged, the disabled and to the victims of
discrimination.

Article 11

All property and wealth must be used responsibly in accordance with
justice and for the advancement of the human race. Economic and
political power must not be handled as an instrument of domination,
but in the service of economic justice and of the social order.

TRUTHFULNESS AND TOLERANCE

Article 12

Every person has a responsibility to speak and act truthfully. No
one, however high or in should speak lies. The right to privacy and
to personal and professional confidentiality is to be
respected. No one is obliged to tell all the truth to everyone all
the time.

Article 13

No politicians, public servants, business leaders, scientists, writers
or artists are exempt from general ethical standards, nor are
physicians, lawyers and other professionals who have special
duties to clients. Professional and other codes of ethics should
reflect the priority of general standards such as those of
truthfulness and fairness.

Article 14

The freedom of the media to inform the public and to criticize
institutions of society and governmental actions, which is society and
governmental actions, which is essential for a just
society, must be used with responsibility and discretion. Freedom of
the media carries a special responsibility for accurate and truthful
reporting. Sensational reporting that degrades the human
person or dignity must at all times be avoided.

Article 15

While religious freedom must be guaranteed, the representatives of
religions have a special responsibility to avoid expressions of
prejudice and acts of discrimination toward those of
different beliefs. They should not incite or legitimize hatred,
fanaticism and religious wars, but should foster tolerance and mutual
respect between all people.

MUTUAL RESPECT AND PARTNERSHIP

Article 16

All men and all women have a responsibility to show respect to one
another and understanding in their partnership. No one should subject
another person to sexual exploitation or dependence.
Rather, sexual partners should accept the responsibility of caring for
each others’ well being.

Article 17

In all its cultural and religious varieties marriage requires love,
loyalty and forgiveness and should aim at guaranteeing security and
mutual support.

Article 18

Sensible family planning is the responsibility of every couple. The
relationship between parents and children should reflect mutual love,
respect, appreciation and concern. No parents
or other adults should exploit, abuse or maltreat children.

CONCLUSION

Article 19

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any
state, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to
perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the
responsibilities, rights and freedom set forth in this Declaration and
in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: CAC@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: fyi – G
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 13:54:53 EDT

>From _Boardwatch Magazine_, Aug. 1997, p. 68:

“With Hong Kong controlled by China, businesses with ties to the Far East
are wondering what’s ahead.

One group that’s trying to peer into the future is the _Asia Society_, an
Asian cultural and educational institution based in New York City and
founded by John D. Rockefeller III.

The society has a new web site called _Ask Asia_ http://www.askasia.com
that presents cultural and historical information about the region…”

G
———————————————
http://members.aol.com/ozoneg

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: jql@earthlink.net
Cc: CAC@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: fyi – G
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 15:07:55 EDT

Jeff,

Address Correction (My mistake, sorry, G): http://www.askasia.org

On Fri, 05 Sep 1997 11:45:32 jql@earthlink.net writes:
>Can you give me the exact URL address. The one listed below does not
>come up.

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 11:52:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: update on the Denny’s situation

CACers:

An update on the Denny’s situation. – Tim

DA: Denny’s didn’t discriminate against Asian Americans

September 4, 1997 Web posted at: 10:36 p.m. EDT (0236 GMT)

SYRACUSE, New York (CNN) — Onondaga County District Attorney
William Fitzpatrick says he has found no evidence to support
claims by Asian-American students that they suffered racial
discrimination at a Denny’s restaurant.

Ending a two-week investigation with a 29-page report,
Fitzpatrick said “an objective look at the events” proves false
the Syracuse University students’ claims that they were
discriminated against in the restaurant.

The students’ lawyer, Elizabeth OuYang, of the Asian American
Legal Defense and Education Fund, said she was “extremely
disappointed” with the report. She also indicated that she will
ask for a federal criminal investigation.

Karen Randall, a spokeswoman at Denny’s headquarters in
Spartanburg, South Carolina, said the company would have no
comment until officials had read the report.

This is the second time in three years that nationally publicized
allegations of racial discrimination have been lodged against the
restaurant chain.

In 1994, Denny’s, which has 891 company-owned and 716 franchised
restaurants nationwide, settled a $46 million class-action
lawsuit brought by black Secret Service agents and California
students who claimed discrimination in separate incidents.

Two weeks ago, the Syracuse students filed a federal lawsuit
contending they were denied service at Denny’s because of “race,
ethnicity or national origin.” The group consisted of six Asian
Americans, three blacks and one white.

A week before the suit was filed, a federal civil rights monitor
recommended that Denny’s fire one of the Syracuse restaurant’s
employees and suspend another.

Charles Davis, the restaurant owner, says he followed the
recommendation “under protest. But I said from day one that no
discrimination took place, and I never changed my story.”

OuYang disagrees, and added, “We feel the DA has a major conflict
of interest since the county is implicated in our lawsuit. This
decision is written in a way to protect the county.”

The students claim they waited 30 minutes for tables while white
patrons were routinely seated. They claim that, after
complaining, they were ejected by deputies moonlighting as
security guards.

In the parking lot, they got into a shoving match with the armed
guards, and then were jeered, racially insulted and physically
attacked by 10 or more white youths who came out of the
restaurant.

The DA’s inquiry found a different scenario.

“All the (independent) witnesses concur that when these students
entered Denny’s and complained, they were obnoxious, intoxicated,
using foul language — totally out of line — and were properly
asked to leave,” Fitzpatrick said.

The students arrived at the restaurant at approximately 2:40
a.m., Fitzpatrick said, a time when bars are closing and Denny’s
was “mobbed.” They had to wait while smaller groups were seated,
but only after waitresses offered to split them into smaller
groups.

Fitzpatrick said the students waited no more than 15 to 20
minutes before one of them confronted the hostess, loudly using
obscenities. When security guards asked him to leave, they all
left, he said.

The two-minute scuffle outside, he said, began when a white
customer threw a punch.

Fitzpatrick said the students refused to cooperate with police
who arrived at the restaurant and with campus police when they
went to the university medical center for treatment of bruises,
cuts and a sprained thumb. He says they later filed statements
through their attorney.

“Everything, from beginning to end, appears to have been
orchestrated,” Fitzpatrick said.

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
RES: (716) 473-2651 [until mid-Sept]
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 01:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: destiny@hooked.net, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Prayer warriors

Sounds exciting. But who are the Spiritual Warfare Network? Are they
Pentagon related? 🙂

– Tim Tseng

In a message dated 9/3/97 11:47:45 AM, destiny@hooked.net wrote:

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
RES: (716) 473-2651 [until mid-Sept]
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: jql@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 02:15:13
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: update on the Denny’s situation

CACers:

In response to the situation at the Denny’s restaurant in Syracuse, Denny’s
has placed a web site located at

h t t p : / / w w w . d e n n y s i n c . c o m

This site shares Denny’s position, background, responses and future
actions. They described their part and features a “bulletin board” section
for people to address their concerns, additional questions not already
asked, feelings, etc. directly to their management.

I hope that all concerned parties will take advantage of this situation to
talk directly with Denny’s, instead of at them.

Jeff
jeffrey lee

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: tstseng@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Mail
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 15:25:40 EDT

Tim, with all due respect to affected parties (sometimes me, too), your
sense of humor is not un-appreciated 🙂 Here’s another story you and CAC
might enjoy. Maybe we could dedicate this to Princess Di.

Best regards, G

<>

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 13:47:33 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Prayer warriors

Dear CACers:

I’ve been properly reminded not to ridicule others who post on the CAC list.
Please accept my apologies to the Prayer Warriors group – I am genuinely
interested in knowing more about them and did not intend my posting to sound
like I was making fun of them. Again, my apologies. – Tim Tseng

In a message dated 9/7/97 3:54:52 PM, you wrote:

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
RES: (716) 473-2651 [until mid-Sept]
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: Rlfong@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 17:07:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: gdot@juno.com, TSTseng@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: ADMIN : Proposed Categories of Mail

I appreciate humor and what not that’s shared in this group, but wonder if
this becomes a moderated group whether or not we could insert classifications
into the header, like maybe the following, before the subject:

PRAYER REQUEST
HUMOR
POETRY
ADMIN
NEWS CLIPPING:
POLITICAL
THEOLOGY
ASIAN-AM
ASIAN

just a thought. let the flames begin

Ronnie

In a message dated 97-09-08 16:08:49 EDT, gdot@juno.com writes:

<>

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 04:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
To: SKYLeung@aol.com
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: THEO Subject from soc.culture.asean Newsgroup

Stephen:

I, too, found this article thought-provoking. Theoretically, I agree with
the idea of balancing individual rights with social responsibilities. But I
wonder about a quote I heard somewhere which said essentially that “more
crimes against humanity are committed in the name of order than in the name
of individual freedom”. Perhaps this is true, I’m not sure.

On a different note, I’d like to extend this idea to our understanding of
ecclesiology. What does stressing responsibility towards other Christians
mean for non-denominational or independent congregations? After all, a case
can be made that congregational autonomy is a result of over-emphasizing
freedom. Any Episcopalian or connectional church people out there care to
respond?

Tim Tseng

In a message dated 9/4/97 9:27:33 AM, you wrote:

<<I found this thought-provoking (a rare event among most newsgroups) for a
variety of reasons. Sorry for this long post. I'd attach it as a file that
all could selectively download if i knew how. Any suggestions FFR?

Stephen Leung
Alexandria, VA
_________

Subject: TIME TO BALANCE HUMAN RIGHTS WITH RESPONSIBILITIES
From: myanmar@twics.com (Myanmar.)
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 12:20:51 GMT
Message-id:

THE JAPAN TIMES (1 9 97)

TIME TO BALANCE HUMAN RIGHTS WITH RESPONSIBILITIES

By SHIGEO SHIMADA>>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716——————–

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 07:30:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: NOT HUMOR: Call for submisions

CACers:
FYI.
Tim
===================

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS

INTERSECTIONS AND DIVERGENCES: CONTEMPORARY ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN
COMMUNITIES

This anthology will present a collection of perspectives on the
changing dynamics of contemporary Asian Pacific American communities
that engage both the intersections and divergences of such community
formations within and across boundaries. With the influx of post-1965
immigrants, Asians are affecting the demographics of the American
population and Asian communities are altering the nature of the
American landscape. These conditions call for an understanding of the
ways in which present-day Asian Pacific Americans reconstitute notions
of “community.”

In this edited book, we are interested in contributions from both
the social sciences and humanities that will address contemporary
issues confronting these growing and vibrant communities. We want
scholarly quality articles that grapple with the transformations in
both empirical and theoretical ways. We encourage essays that explore
the themes of shared histories and diverse experiences of Asian Pacific
American communities.

Our approach considers envisioning communities as territorial
sites or geographically-delineated formations AND as
socially-constructed entities that are based on relations of
similarities and differences, and those that extend to multiple
networks across locations. This collection will specifically address
how Asian Pacific Americans are reconceiving and reshaping such
communities. Analyses may include the examination of representations,
expressions, practices, and cultures of Asian Pacific Americans located
within and beyond homes, families, and formal organizations.

In the chapters, we want scholars to incorporate and engage with
current transformations in the community, such as those based on issues
of gender, generation, class, ethnicity, nationality, language,
culture, religion, and sexuality. Our objective is to provide a
qualitative understanding of how these distinct but overlapping changes
are negotiated and contested among Asian Pacifics. Chapters focusing
on community mobilization around labor, education, environmental
racism, electoral politics, and low-income housing would also be
appropriate.

We also expect that macro-level issues that affect the development
of these communities, such as the restructuring of the global
political-economy, immigration legislation, diasporas, and
suburbanization may be employed as central foci of the essays.

Both of the editors have completed ethnographic fieldwork
projects; one in Filipino American communities, and the other in Asian
American communities. This anthology will rely on knowledge gained
from their research and teaching on contemporary developments in the
formation of Asian Pacific American communities and identities. Both
scholars have published articles and chapters in forthcoming books on
Asian Americans and are in the process of revising their manuscripts on
community studies. Vo is trained in sociology and Bonus in cultural
communications, but they use interdisciplinary approaches in their
scholarly work.

DEADLINE for submissions (one page abstract with title) is December 1,
1997.

FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US FOR MORE INFORMATION:

LINDA TRINH VO, Ph.D.

Comparative American Cultures Dept.

Washington State University

Pullman, WA 99164-4010

Phone (509)335-2889

Fax (509) 335-8338

lvo@mail.wsu.edu

RICK BONUS, Ph.D.

Dept. of Ethnic Studies

University of California, San Diego

La Jolla, CA 92093-0522

Office Phone: (619) 822-1580

Voice and Fax Messages: (619)566-2757

rbonus@weber.ucsd.edu

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
RES: (716) 473-2651 [until mid-Sept]
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

To: larry.fong@lmco.com
Cc: cac@bccn.org
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 11:33:17 -0700
Subject: CAC_Mail: Ministry positions
From: darryl_fong@juno.com (darryl fong)

Ministry positions can be listed with Talbot School of THeology.

Contact Cathy Jensen
Biola University, 13800 Biola Avenue, La Mirada, CA 90639
562-903-4823

Darryl Fong

— End —

From: SKYLeung@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 21:11:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: TSTseng@aol.com
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: THEO Subject from soc.culture.asean Newsgroup

Topic: Ecclesiology
Subject: Rights and Responsibilities and Spiritual Warfare: Asian
Perspectives?

Brother Tim,

Here are a few quick responses/reflections regarding several of your
stimulating
lead-ins. I’ll defer to others (experts) to respond more completely.

More crimes in the name of order:
probably true (cultural revolutions, inquisitions, persecution of
anabaptists, etc. ). I can think of one exception: the injustice of
abortion committed in the name of freedom, against which Mother Teresa spoke
out as much as she spoke out against any other injustice. [Speaking of
Mother Teresa, she walked a pretty respectable line between religious
tolerance and certitude/conviction of her own beliefs.]

Connectional churches:
I’m not familiar with the description. Does that include our Lutheran and
Reformed
brethren? Does it refer to synods, associations, conventions, sessions…?
Perhaps church leaders have quite a different perspective on how this
“constrains” them. As a layperson, I simply have to bite hard on my lip,
from time to time, to keep from blurting, “enough of this Book of Order stuff
already!” [Note: here in DC, the multi-ethnic churches are E-Free and C-M
Alliance, whereas a significant number of the denominational Korean and
Chinese Churches are Presbyterian.]

Responsibility towards other Christians:
in the church, I think one finds more who are willing to serve among the
culturally Asian than among the “westernized.” It may have to do with a
slightly more “collective” mentality. (Resistance is futile!:-) In society,
we sometimes forget that we can be humanitarians without being humanists.
The First Lady’s communitarianism especially grates against the
sensibilities of ultra-conservatives in the U.S. – many of whom are
Christians.

Thought it most interesting that the article explains this premise of the
group of
former heads of state and ecumenical religious leaders in drafting the
Responsibilities Declaration:
“Noting that many societies have traditionally conceived of human
relations in terms of obligations rather than rights, it says that the
concepts of freedom and individuality have traditionally been
emphasized in the West, while the notions of responsibility and
obligation have been stressed in most Eastern civilizations.”

Question:
Do our churches today emphasize the Freedom in the Spirit (Galatians) or
the Exhortations to Order (1 Corinthians) more? Is there more need of one
than
the other? [Francis Schaeffer claimed in _A _Christian_Manifesto_ that the
Judeo-Christian culture helped western society develop a positive balance of
form and freedom, but the present material-energy, chance concept of reality
and the humanistic worldview threaten to let freedom turn into chaos.]

The other topic (spiritual warfare):
Do those from Asian backgrounds have unique contributions to this area
theologically/practically? We often hear of the need for ministries of
“deliverance” in S.E. Asian countries. It makes me wonder. Some who have
worked in that region speak of the affects on subsequent generations of the
afflicted – even those that leave Asia? By no means the only manifestations
of SW, nonetheless, demonic possession and oppression do not seem to be
totally foreign phenomena among Asians. Yet, except for a minority
associated with Vineyard or some other “charismatic” ministry, we remain
fairly silent on the topic don’t we?

More questions; not too many answers….

In the Redeemer,
Stephen Leung

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:36:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: CFP: Korean-American Women’s Anthology

CACers:
FYI, Tim

================================================

K O R E A N / A M E R I C A N W O M E N ‘ S A N T H O L O G Y
* * * * * C A L L F O R S U B M I S S I O N S * * * * *
New deadline: Novemeber 30, 1997

SUBMISSIONS sought for an anthology investigating how
Korean/American/women stage and restage “attitude(s).” Brought to you by
the makers of KAWAzine, a ‘zine produced by Korean American Women with
Attitude, this anthology hopes to map out heterogeneous re-presentations
of Korean/American women’s subjectivities and communities.

What does it mean to have an attitude(s)? Attitude can be interpreted,
produced and performed in infinite ways; yet the very term questions the
status quo (ever been told you have an attitude problem?).

Dissatisfied with, yet nonetheless compelled by, normative figurations
of the ‘Korean American Woman,’ an attitude can indiscreetly protest the
malady of orthodox compliance and complicity. Having attitude and making
trouble, we risk being ostracized from what we were conditioned to believe
as most precious and perfect. But there is also a chance for community,
celebration and camaraderie as dissenters on our own terms. And together,
from our different and simliar histories, we can push and activate this
collective identification korean/american/women within today’s global,
political and historical schema.

Do you have an attitude? Have you been told that you did (and were you
shamefully proud)? How do you identify, feel about, represent having an
‘attitude’? What are its risks and contradictions, pleasures and secrets?
How have history, theory, feminism, immigration, adoption, travel,
religion, desire, class, sexuality, gender, race, ethnicity, and language
affected your ‘attitude/s?’

There are no restrictions per se, but we strongly encourage works that
are experimental, transgressive, hybrid, irreverent, perverse, gothic,
surreal, subversive, and/or queer. Working from a space informed, but not
bound, by identity-politics, we recognize that “identity” necessitates
drawing circles of exclusion and inclusion. We wholeheartedly look forward
to work from women who have felt/are especially feeling excluded from the
prevailing ideas of what it means to be “korean” “woman” and “american.”

Prose, poetry, essay, photographs, drawings, etc. are all welcome. Works
can be in any language. Contributors must identify as Korean or Korean
American Women.

*SPECIAL NOTE: KAWAzines can be obtained by sending $2 (for each copy) to
the below address.

—–DEADLINE is November 30, 1997.——
Submissions (preferably on Mac/PC diskette) with two
self-addressed-stamped envelope, a brief bio and a cover letter should be
mailed to:

Attitudes Anthology
828 Colorado Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90041

Submissions, with bio and cover letter, may also be e-mailed to:
jskim@ocf.berkeley.edu

********************************************************************

For more information, please contact: jskim@ocf.berkeley.edu

This call can also be found at
http://www.geocities.com/~han-queerean/kawabook.htm
(to reach the site again, search the words “queerean,” “queer + Korean”
in Yahoo!)

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
RES: (716) 473-2651 [until mid-Sept]
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:37:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: ARTICLE: Asian immigrants and affirmative action

CACers:

I found an article from the Setp. 9th Wall Street Journal about Asian
Americans and Affirmative Action. Because it is a bit lengthy, please email
privately if you would like to a copy sent to you. Here is an excerpt… Tim

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

Dear CACers:

During my last year at Denver Seminary, I had the privilege of guiding the
last student to complete a M.A. program in Church History there. This
remarkable student wrote a very well balanced thesis about James Dobson.
While admiring Dobsom very much, the student was critical of Dobson’s recent
political turn towards a right wing agenda (which I believe doesn’t serve the
interests of Asian Americans or other minority groups – Christian or not).

Anyway, I found this concern for Dobson and Focus in a press release by Gil
Alexander-Moegerle, one of the co-founders of Focus on the Family. Though
much of it may be exaggerated, I hope that it will help the many well
intentioned Christians who are very enamoured by Dobson, Bauer, etc. to
understand why others (including many evangelicals) are so worried about the
religious right.

– Tim

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: CAC@bccn.org
Cc: TSTENG@aol.com
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: CFP: Korean-American Women’s Anthology
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 23:19:38 EDT

On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:36:28 -0400 (EDT) TSTseng@aol.com writes:
> K O R E A N / A M E R I C A N W O M E N ‘ S A N T H O L O G Y
>* * * * * C A L L F O R S U B M I S S I O N S * * * * *
============

CAC, fyi,

What follows may have little if anything to do with Tim’s posting,
referenced above, but is definitely related to our discussion of
PK/gender/women/etc. If anyone would like to respond to the following
article, it may require a new thread–go for it!

Best regards, G

=============

(Sources: http://www.denverpost.com/news/mark82.htm

and

_The Denver Post_, 9/9/97)

<>

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 23:52:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Anthropologists Against Race

CACers:

Here’s something to chew on! What happens if “race” (i.e., the words
“Caucasian,” “Asian,” “African,” “Hispanic/Latino”) is deleted from American
public policy discourse? It is true that there is NO biological evidence for
asserting racial differences, but does this mean that public policy and
discourse cannot use the terms? Does it mean that inequities based on false
notions of race can be ignored?

Tim

The Chronicle of Higher Education: Daily news
—————————————————

Anthropological Assn. Urges Government
to Stop Collecting Data Based on Race

By DAVID L. WHEELER

The American Anthropological Association
urged the federal government Monday to
stop collecting statistics based on race.

The association said that the concept of
race was based on pseudo-science, not
science. “Biological-sounding terms add
nothing to the precision, rigor, or
factual basis of information being
collected to characterize the identities
of the American population,” said a
statement released by the association.

The anthropology group made the
recommendation to the federal Office of
Management and Budget, which is
considering how to revise the racial and
ethnic categories used in the official
collection of information, including the
U.S. Census.

The association said that “ethnic
origin,” or a similar term, should be
used to describe a person’s ancestry in
research.

Mary Margaret Overby, the association’s
director of governmental relations, said
the anthropology group understood that
research on human health, economic
status, and other issues required that
the U.S. population be divided into
categories. “The idea is you can still
track them,” she said. “They just don’t
need to be labeled as race.”

The association’s statement said that
racial categories have grown out of
European folk taxonomies and wildly
inaccurate misperceptions. Caucasians,
for instance, were once believed to be
descended from people in the Caucasus
Mountains and to possess the world’s most
perfect skulls.

Dr. Overby said that discussion of new
ways to study human variability would be
a major theme in the association’s
newsletters and at its annual meeting, in
November.

The association has posted background
information on the issue, as well as a
statement of its position on race-based
statistics, on the World-Wide Web, at
http://www.ameranthassn.org/ombprinf.htm

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 23:53:47 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Fwd: Pacific Asian History & Narrative Workshop

FYI, Tim
———————
Forwarded message:
From: starborn@sirius.com (Stella Marie Harder)
To: janei@socrates.berkeley.edu (Jane Naomi Iwamura),
aarcsposts@socrates.berkeley.edu
Date: 97-09-11 12:28:14 EDT

NOTE: Pls. reply to pacts@igc.org

>Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
>To: gtu-list@netcom.com
>From: PACTS@igc.org (Pacific & Asian American Center for Theology &
Strategies)
>Subject: Pacific Asian History & Narrative Workshop

>
>HISTORY & NARRATIVE WORKSHOP for SEMINARIANS, STUDENTS,LAY PEOPLE, FACULTY
>and CLERGY OF PACIFIC ASIAN HERITAGE & RELIGIOSITY
>
>DEAR FRIENDS,
>
>We want to invite you to an exciting event coming up. It is the 3rd event
>of the Pacific Asian Heritage & Religion Series with the theme of History
>and Narrative, taking place Saturday, September 27, 9:30 a.m. – 4:00 p.m.
>at the Pacific School of Religion, 1798 Scenic Ave. Berkeley.
>
>This day will be a unique opportunity to engage in the power of story and
>narrative and to learn the practice of drawing religious meaning
>(theologizing) out of everyday story and narrative. The process will be
>led by well-known Asian theologian and PSR professor of Asian Theology and
>Culture, Professor C.S. Song who has led similar workshops on narrative
>theology with religious leaders in Asia. This event will be an excellent
>learning opportunity for lay persons , seminarians, students of religion,
>clergy, and academics. All are encouraged to attend. Registration is
>$10-$20 sliding scale, (lunch included), and scholarships are available.
>
>We are asking that all workshop participants think of a particular story,
>be it personal, cultural, historical, etc. that is of significance to you.
>In preparation for the workshop we are encouraging participants to please
>write down their story (in abridged form, 1 page only) and send it to the
>PACTS office, so that we can make a packet of stories that will become the
>texts for our workshop. (Don’t worry it doesn’t have to be perfect. Just
>send it!). Of course, if you can’t send in a story before the event,
>please come anyway, but have a story in mind! Please send in your stories
>and RSVP by September 20th by phone (510)849-0653, email (pacts@igc.org).
>
>Registration begins at 9:00 a.m. with refreshments, so come early if you
>want to read through the story packets! If you have any further questions
>about the conference, please feel free to call us! We look forward to
>seeing you there!
>
>Peace,
>
>Deborah Lee
>Director, PACTS
>
>****************************************************************************
>**PACTS strives to build solidarity between grassroots peoples’ struggles
>for justice and human rights and Asian Pacific American faith communities
>through action and theological reflection with emphasis on partnership
>between women and men. PACTS is an ecumenical and interfaith network.
>
>PACIFIC & ASIAN AMERICAN CENTER FOR THEOLOGY AND STRATEGIES
>2400 Ridge Road
>Berkeley CA 94709
>Phone: 510/849-0653
>FAX: 510/649-1730
>email: pacts@igc.org

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 23:53:33 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: ANNOUNCE: AAAS Conference Info

CACers:

FYI, Tim

========================
In a message dated 9/8/97 11:57:52 PM, you wrote:

<<From: Mary Yu
Subject: AAAS Information (fwd)

Hi To all,

Many of you have been requesting info on the upcoming AAAS conference,
here it is. Please note that you must be a member in order to present at
the conference. So if you are not already a member, please sign up so
that your proposals will be considered by the program committee. For
those of you who already received this info. I apologize. ———-
——————————————–

Call for Papers

1898-1998: Rethinking Asian and Pacific Colonial/Post-colonial Nations,
Identities, and Histories

June 24-28, 1998
Honolulu, Hawai’i
Ilikai Hotel

The year 1998 marks the 100th anniversary of the U.S. annexation of
Hawai’i, the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico. While the Philippines
has attained political independence, the other annexed territories
along with several Pacific Island states (e.g., American Samoa, Belau)
continue under American colonial or neocolonial rule. European powers
also engaged in colonization of Asia and the Pacific, as did some Asian
nations, most notably Japan. In the contemporary situation, Asian and
Pacific nations and their peoples are subject to new forms of political
and economic dependency and subordination engendered by transnational
capitalism, international labor migration, and the globalization of
consumer culture. In light of popular movements for sovereignty and
independence, the historical developments and transformations over the
past century resulting from American, European, and Asian colonial and
neocolonial rule in Asia and the Pacific need to be reassessed.

Next year’s AAAS conference provides a timely opportunity for such a
rethinking of the colonial/post-colonial status of Asian and Pacific
nations and their cultures and peoples, particularly those living in
the United States. The Association encourages the submission of panels
and papers that interrogate the political, economic, and cultural
status of Asian and Pacific communities in the U.S. and their linkages
with their homelands from historical and contemporary perspectives.

PROPOSAL DEADLINE: November 1, 1997. For further information and
proposal guidelines see AAAS homepage at
(http://www.aasp.cornell.edu), or contact: Asian American Studies
Program, 420 Rockefeller Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

1998 Theme Questions, contact:
Dr. Jonathan Y. Okamura
University of Hawai’i
SEED Office
2600 Campus Road
Honolulu, HI 96822
(808) 956-6749
okamuraj@hawaii.edu

Proposal Guidelines

1. Paper proposals must be typed, double-spaced, and include a title,
the name of the presenter, and that person’s institutional affiliation
as these would appear in the final, printed program. Panel proposals
should bear a title, a chair, discussant and their institutional
affiliations, and a proposal for each paper included in that panel.
Each proposal must include a brief, two-page vitae of all the
participants.

Please Note. It is the rule and policy of the Association that you can
only present one paper per meeting (mega-sessions are excluded). If you
plan to submit more than one paper and/or panel proposal, please indicate
your preference and priority. Completed panels will be given first
priority.

2. A paper proposal should not exceed 250 words, but must be full
enough to enable the program committee to assess its contents.

3. The program committee encourages full panel proposals (usually
comprised of two or three papers, with a chair and discussant) as
opposed to single paper submissions. Although the latter are welcome,
panel proposals stand a better chance of being accepted.

Please Note. In the past, most paper and panel proposals were accepted.
Increasingly, program committees have been far more selective, because of
the large number of submissions. Some of the criteria employed in the
selection process include: how the proposal expands upon the theme of the
conference; the quality of the proposal and its contribution to the
advancement of scholarship; how well each panel holds together, how each
paper adds to the whole; and panel diversity (e.g., gender, ethnicity,
regional distribution).

4. The program committee welcomes individuals who wish to participate
in the program as chairs or discussants, and not as paper presenters.
Those who are willing to serve in those capacities should so indicate
and submit a brief, two-page vitae.

5. All of those selected for inclusion in the 1998 program must be
members of the Association for Asian American Studies, or must join before
participation in the conference.

6. Proposals must be received by November 1, 1997.

7. Requests for audio/visual equipment must be submitted by November 1,
1997. Because of increasing costs for audio/visual equipment, the
Association reserves the right to passon rental charges to panelists.

Send to: 1998 Conference Committee, Asian American Studies Program,
420 Rockefeller Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2602,
(607) 255-3320, FAX (607) 254-4996, e-mail: aaasconference@cornell.edu.

APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP

1 January 1997

Membership in the Assocation for Asian American Studies is based on a
calendar year, i.e., January 1st to December 31st. A member in good
standing will receive the quarterly Newsletter, the published directory of
members, Directory of Asian American Studies Programs, and reduced rates
at the national conference.

Membership Fee Schedule:

Regular: Student: (Include copy of Student I.D.)

____ $40 Income less than $20,000 ____ $30 Individual

____ $60 $20,000 – $40,000 ____$40 Student
Organization

____ $80 Income more than $40,000

____ $85 Institutions

Name
_________________________________________________________________

Position/Title
_________________________________________________________

Institution Address
_______________________________________________________

Mailing Address
________________________________________________________

Office Telephone ( ) _____________ Home Telephone ( )
__________________

Fax ________ __________________ E-Mail _______________________________

Academic Discipline
_____________________________________________________

Areas of Research Interest
_________________________________________________

Education BA ____ MA ____ PhD ____ Other (specify)
____________________

Ethnicity (optional) _________________
_____ Male ________ Female _______

_____You give us permission to use your biographical information for an
AAAS membership directory. You must check this box if you want to be
listed in the directory.

We also now accept MasterCard or Visa.

Card Number: ______________________Expiration Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Make checks payable to: Association for Asian American Studies

Mail to: Association for Asian American Studies, Cornell
University, 420 Rockefeller Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853

Anita Affeldt
Administrative Manager
Asian American Studies Program
420 Rockefeller Hall
Phone: (607) 254-4774, or 255-3320
FAX: (607) 254-4996
http://aasp.cornell.edu>&gt;

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:11:23 -0400 (EDT)
To: gdot@juno.com, CAC@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: Suitable Helpers’ article

Gary:

Wow! What an article (i.e., Denver Post: “Suitable Helpers”). Does PK
really tell men to take leadership roles in their families? I thought that
PK allowed room for mutuality (Eph. 5:21)? Here I take issue with the
article writer (unless I’m wrong and he is correct).

I respect the need for many people to find some structure and order in their
lives – that is one of the functions (not the only one, thankfully) of
“religion.” So a group of women who advocate the second fiddle role in a
marriage can probably save a few marriages (especially for men who absolutely
must be first fiddle – or cello – or viola – or whatever). Frankly, the
world outside the sanctity of the home is a scary place and it is a lot safer
to submit than to have to cope with our market-driven, corporate-dominated
society.

I wonder what Cecilia Lau (of Chinese Christian Mission) and Christians for
Biblical Equality would say about “Suitable Helpers” – could anyone get a
statement from them?

In any case, I urge all Asian American women who join “Suitable Helpers” to
make sure that Asian issues are heard. If there is an Asian version of SH,
do not submit to the submissive women leadership! Be sure that Asian
American Christian women concerns are on the agenda! Don’t play second
fiddle to advocates of the second fiddle. [Please note the sarcasm in my
tone – flame me sarcasm]

Thanks again, Gary!

Tim

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: DCChuang@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 01:44:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: TSTseng@aol.com
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

In a message dated 97-09-12 09:55:07 EDT, you write:

<>

Tim, after reading that press release, I found little substance to support
his claims. Having listened to Dr. Dobson on occassion, I agree with you that
there may be much exaggeration.

I’d be interested in reading about specific examples the author has to
support his claims. Having nothing to back his arguments, I see him engaging
in the same demonization in which he claims to be against.

Thanks,
DC

— End —

Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 01:50:02 -0400
From: DJ Chuang
To: TSTseng@aol.com
CC: CAC@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: Suitable Helpers’ article

TSTseng@aol.com wrote:
> I wonder what Cecilia Lau (of Chinese Christian Mission) and Christians for
> Biblical Equality would say about “Suitable Helpers” – could anyone get a
> statement from them?

Timothy,
I would like to share some items of clarification, as on this CAC list
we have many readers from diverse theological backgrounds, even tho’
many of the discussions seem more progressive or socio-political.. (and
I get the feeling some evangelicals may get confused and/or might
appreciate a balanced presentation)

Among the evangelicals, there are 2 major organizations that deal with
issues regarding gender roles:

Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood

and

Christians for Biblical Equality

The former, CBMW, upholds a traditional conservative view of gender
roles, often labeled “complementarian”, that male and female have some
distinct exclusive roles.

The latter, CBE, upholds a progressive or moderate view, often labeled
mutuality or “egalitarian” view, perhaps called progressive or moderate,
that male and female are in partnership and equals.

Both CBMW and CBE are members of the National Association of
Evangelicals (NAE) and of the Evangelical Council of Financial
Accountability (ECFA).

DJ

— End —

From: HarryWLew@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 22:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

Dear Tim and CACers:

Is it just me or do the rest of you detect that most of the political posts
on this mailing list is of the liberal persuasion?

Just wondering…

I for one do not believe that affirmative action is in the best interest of
Asian Americans, and most Chinese-Americans, especially college students,
feel the same way.

Yours in Christ,
Rev. Harry Lew

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 00:06:14 -0400 (EDT)
To: DCChuang@aol.com
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

DC:

I will be the first to admit that I’ve not listened to much of Dobson’s
broadcasts. A Chinese evangelical psychologist friend of mine has a less
flattering view of his advice for the family – but I’m no expert. When I
have listened in, I found his blending of pop psychology, friendly anecdotes,
blind nationalism, and biblical interpretation to be both interesting,
delightful, and sometimes, helpful. But I’ve also heard him on occasion rail
against what he calls [not exact quote] the “pro-abortion, pro-homo-sexual,
anti-family” political forces that are running and ruining the nation. Based
on my experience of Dobson, I cannot demonize him for expressing his
convictions – even if he offends people.

However, the problem really is Gary Bauer and the Family Research Council.
Focus on the Family has channeled much support, if not finances, to Bauer to
lobby in Washington for what they label a “pro-family agenda.” While Gil
Alexander-Moegerle may be exaggerating a little, his speech accurately
reflects the feelings that many have about the religious right, in general,
and James Dobson & Gary Bauer, in particular. These feelings, even if
incorrect, must be addressed! They are not simply anti-religious prejudice.
Some examples:

1. The recent debate over China’s most-favored nation status. Many
evangelical Christians more familiar with the situation in China than Bauer
questioned Bauer’s opposition to China’s MFN status and were “bashed” for
expressing this view. Even if Bauer and Dobson were not responsible for this
down right “un-Christian” treatment, they need to address the declining
freedom to disagree among their supporters.

2. Factsecular humanists” or “liberals” without listening to the substance of
their opponents’ views) have made it unbearable for theologically
conservative or moderate evangelicals who may differ on political questions.
I suppose that from their perspective, they are merely purifying the church
by disciplining those who have fallen astray (often by firing those who
disagree or attacking them mercilously). Given this development, is it any
wonder why progressive evangelicals and non-evangelical Christians are so
concerned about groups identified with the right wing? Not only are these
folk “purifying” their own ranks so unethically, is it possible that they may
do the same thing to non-Christians? Will there be a witch-hunt? [Probably
not, but spokespersons of the religious right have given little evidence that
they would be more civil in public life]. Note the new book written by the
President of the International Bible Society (his name escapes me) entitled
_Sinners in the Hands of an Angry Christian_ where he expresses much
reservation about the behavior of right wingers.

So I suspect that evangelicals like Gil Alexander-Moegerle, Jim Wallis, and
others are saying is that folks like the Christian Coalition, the Family
Research Council, and James Dobson do not speak for them when they claim that
their “agenda” is the Christian one. Personally, I disagree with the
conservative agenda about the family because facts show that the breakdown of
the nuclear family (which itself is not necessarily biblical) can be
attributed to shifts from modern industrial to a high tech capitalism over
the past 40 years. While the libertarian ideas of the 1960s, abortion,
welfare, decline of family “values”, feminism, and the “gay agenda” are
convenient scapegoating targets, they are not the real reasons why families
are breaking down. Families that fall apart usually do so because a single
income is no longer enough to raise a family. A dollar buys less and less
today than it did during the boom economy of the “Leave It to Beaver” world.
Consequently, financial pressures make parenting so much more difficult
today than it was in the past. I fail to see how the policies of right wing
proponents will assist parents. Are they advocating for more family friendly
policies where day care facilities can be brought into the work place? where
welfare moms are encouraged to be good mothers rather than being forced to
abandon their families in order to work and where working moms are affirmed?
where fathers will be asked to assume much more of the family
responsibilities? Similarly, the rise in sexual libertarianism and the
perceived decline in Victorian (i.e., Anglo-American) family values should
not be attributed to “feminism” or “liberalism”. Consumerism and materialism
have done more to alter America’s moral landscape (after all, sex sells!).
And the engine fueling all this is an increasingly unrestrained
international capitalism – not” liberals” (though in truth, political
liberals also support this trend). Yet, I hear no analysis like this from
Bauer, American Enterprise, the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, the
Christian Coalition, etc. Could it be because they are funded by American
corporations who have an interest in deflecting blame away from themselves?
[note: I am not a Marxist!!!!! I don’t want to destroy capitalism, but want
to be able to critique it so that it will more fairly distribute its fruits.]
Anyway, I’ve said enough.

In sum, (1) the way many right wing Christians are treating evangelical
Christians who disagree with the politics is appalling and a real cause for
concern; (2) the arguments of right wing Christians do not, in my opinion,
really support a pro-family public policy – what they really support is
unrestrained-international-corporate-capitalism. Others may disagree – which
is fine with me – but I’d like to see their evidence, too. – Tim

In a message dated 9/13/97 12:44:31 AM, DC Chuang wrote:

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 00:51:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: HarryWLew@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

Dear Rev. Lew:

Because I’m the most active participant on this list, I accept responsibility
for giving the impression that “most of the political posts” sound “liberal”
– so please do not label the CAC list a “liberal” list. I hope that my posts
have provided an alternative view than what many Christians are hearing from
politically conservative Christians who dominate evangelicalism. I suspect
that most on this list are conservative Christians who have not openly
articulated their views. DC Chuang of the Family Research Council has posted
some politically conservative messages (which I hope he will continue to do).

I think it would also help if you said more about what you mean by “liberal”
– my postings may sound “liberal” to some, “radical” to others, and
“conservative” to yet another group. Furthermore, to be liberal politically
is not all that bad (even though I don’t fully identify with this political
tradition). It is a tradition that has supported the inclusion of
immigrants, the abolition of slavery, the protection of victims of unbridled
capitalism, civil rights, and efforts to restrain the power of corporate
America. It also is optimistic about the ability of government to accomplish
all the above – thus, it has resulted in a larger, more bureaucratic gov’t
(imitating corporations to regulate corporations) and higher taxes.
Ironically, the liberal tradition may actually be more conservative than the
“conservative tradition.” After all, what is more radical, what causes more
social upheavals, what creates the sense of technological advance better than
capitalism? If anything, restraining corporate capitalism is the real
conservative agenda. Now I’m not enamoured by big government and paying a
disproportionate amount of taxes (the wealthy and our corporations get
unbelieveable tax loop holes and breaks), but I cannot support an agenda
which will simply allow contemporary capitalism to continue without
restraint, i.e., the political conservativism.

So what am I? I am an evangelical who sees the world through the lenses of
the prophetic protestant tradition. This tradition’s reading of Scripture
was largely responsible for the abolitionist movement, the social gospel
movement, the missionary movement, 19th century feminism, and the Civil
Rights movement. All of these movements met with opposition by conservative
Christians who were comfortable with the socio-economic and
political-cultural status quo. Many of the goals of prophetic protestantism
were translated into “political liberalism” – which is so misunderstood and
hated by many Christians today. It would help me tremendously to know what
the biblical roots of politically conservative Christians are – so please
post on this list!!

Re: affirmative action and Asian Americans. I understand the disagreement
over this issue – but alot depends on who one listens to. Neo-conservatives
and the mainstream media like to portray Asian Americans as model minorities
who do not benefit from Affirm. Action. But the article in the Wall Street
Journal which I offered (but did not post) seems to be arguing the opposite
in terms of business contracts. In the business world, Asian Americans do
benefit from affirm. action at the expense of Blacks and Hispanics. Perhaps
the reverse is true in college. In any case, I support affirmative action on
principle. The way it is implemented may need adjusting periodically, but
affirm. action ensures that I won’t be passed over because of my race. It
also ensures that diversity remains valued in American institutions (did you
see the drop in minority enrollment at U. California and U. Texas – schools
which have abandoned affirmative action?). Of course, if you do not have to
work or study in a mainstream institution and can work strictly within an
Asian American context, there is no need for affirmative action…or if you
really believe that mainstream American institutions hire workers or selects
students on the basis of merit alone. It’s primarily those who have to
function in mainstream America who feel that affirmative action protects
them, abstract theorizing aside.

I must have too much time on my hands. Thanks for your indulgence.

Tim

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:37:35 -0500
To: TSTseng@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
From: Samuel Ling
Subject: CAC_Mail: Macro and micro analysis: why families break down

I find Tim and DC’s exchange of why families are breakdown
to be most stimulating. It reminds me that we need two
approaches to interpret the breakdown of the family:
(a) personal responsibility — men as well as women need to
search our souls as to why we work, etc. All need to go back
to seek a biblical model for the husband, the wife, and the single
adult’s role in life, at work, at home and in church.
(b) social analysis — it is true that evangelicals have often been
critiqued by others (including secular historians) to promote
corporate capitalism. I read somewhere 20 years ago in grad
school, an interpretation which saw Dwight L. Moody’s preaching
as promoting a docile obedience on the part of industrial workers.
Such critique makes us conservatives (I count myself as theological
conservative) think. Thanks Tim for sticking your non-Marxist
neck out and speaking. Thanks Harry Lew for reminding all of
us that the CAC forum need more “conservative” (I suppose,
sociopolitically conservative) viewpoints aired.

I, too, have said too much; I, too, must have too much time on
my hands.

Sam Ling
16334 Fieldcrest Court
La Mirada, CA 90638
(562) 947-0267 (new address and phone)

— End —

To: TSTseng@aol.com, sling@chinahorizon.org, DCChuang@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 16:45:30 -0600
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?
From: gdot@juno.com (G Ottoson)

Tim:

Sam wrote ‘thanks..for sticking your non-Marxist neck out’ in regard to
your email response to DC, see 1. and 2. below. It appears that Sam
assumes that you/your views are not under Marxist influence. Is this
correct? If not, to what extent is the influence? In this case, how do
you sort out the influence of Marx (and his views/followers) from the
influence of the Scripture/the Spirit? What is Marx’s influence
on/relationship to the ‘prophetic Protestant tradition’? Others may want
to stand there with you 🙂 Thanks for your time.

Gary

1.
On Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:37:35 -0500 Samuel Ling
writes:
> Thanks Tim for sticking your non-Marxist neck out and speaking.

2.
On Sun, 14 Sep 1997 00:06:14 -0400 (EDT) TSTseng@aol.com writes:
>DC:
>…In sum, (1)…
>In a message dated 9/13/97 12:44:31 AM, DC Chuang wrote:
>
><<Tim, after reading that press release, I found little substance to

— End —

From: GAPang@aol.com
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 19:46:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: TSTseng@aol.com, HarryWLew@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action (AA)…

In a message dated 97-09-14 02:46:09 EDT, TSTseng@aol.com writes:

<>

Dear Tim,

I must speak on this issue. I think that just because Asian Americans
benefit from Affirmative Action (AA), I do not feel that it makes AA right.
Especially if its at the expense of those it is trying to “help”.

You also say that… “It’s primarily those who have to function in mainstream
America who feel that affirmative action protects them…” The best job
security is to do a job well. If a person is discharged on racial grounds,
there is certainly legal action that can be taken aside from AA. I feel that
those in mainstream America, will only ever be seen as “equals” when race is
no longer an issue in hiring. As long as AA exists, there will always be the
question if a better qualified non-minority was passed over. It may gain us
a job, but is it right?

Just some food for thought…

Serving Him,

Garrick Pang

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:15:13 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

Sam and Gary:

I, too, must have too much time on my hand. So I regret staying up so late
to write . . . but I guess I’m hooked on this list –

First I apologize for associating DC Chuang with the Family Research Council.
I mistakenly thought he sent FRC press releases on this list (which I
value!).

In response to Sam’s thoughts about my remarks regarding the decline of the
family – lest I be accused of giving “secularists” too much weight – I
believe that Christ can transform individuals through preaching, teaching,
disciplemaking, and Christian community. In fact, on the microlevel, as Sam
mentioned, individual testimonies of change is often the clearest evidence of
the working of the Holy Spirit in people’s lives. When I preach, I don’t
usually talk social analysis because that moment when the saints are gathered
is a special, sacred time of praise and ministration. To me, the development
of Christlike character is still the first and most important step for
faithful local church ministry. On this point, I think most of us will
agree. But once we get to the macrolevel, disagreements will abound. Though
I’ve sounded off my perspectives very often – based on my reading of
Scripture and the prophetic protestant tradition – I still hope to hear other
perspectives. I’m sorry if I sounded derisive of those I don’t agree with,
but if I’ve disturbed anyone satisfied with “unthinking conformity” (which I
refuse to believe is true of the many intelligent, committed Asian American
Christians on this list) to the dominant conservative Christian language on
public policy, then I feel that I have fulfilled a part of my calling within
the body of Christ.

Re: Gary’s probing question about Marx. I have read both Karl and Groucho
Marx – I like the latter better. To the extent that K. Marx draws some of
his ideas from Scripture, I think he is insightful. But the classical Marx is
an economic reductionist and did not allow space for cultural or religious
factors in his analysis. Some 20th century “marxists” like Antonio Gramsci
were more open to including these other factors. But beyond ideas, the
historical outcomes of societies which claim Marx as their patron saint have
not been able to overcome the human condition of sin. So corruption and
repression occurs there as well. Thus, I may like Marx’s critique of
capitalism, but am not as confident as he was about its demise or the
necessity of its demise. Nonetheless, both Marxism and Christianity provide
alternative voices in light of the dominance of corporate capitalism today
and, in my opinion, should neither be diametrically opposed or equated. Just
as there are convergences between Christianity and democracy and human
rights, there are convergences with much Marxist thought. The question will
be whether American Christianity can search its biblical roots to find
resources to envision something to restrain/counter the idolatrous
aspirations of this age (including corporate capitalism, philosophical
nihilism, and repressive governments) before anti-religious Marxist-inspired
activists undermine the validity of Christian faith for those who seek
economic justice. For example, as you know, Gary, I was very happy about the
teamster’s victory in the recent UPS strike. After years of repressive
policy (and despite the reality of union corruption), unions are perhaps
making a comeback and can offer a counterweight to the giant corporations.
But, where were the Christians in this matter? Will our lack of support of
unions come back to bite us in the future?

Okay. Enough for now. I have to return to my other job. 🙂

Tim

In a message dated 9/14/97 5:42:50 PM, you wrote:

<>

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 01:06:16 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action

GAPang@aol.com wrote:
> I must speak on this issue. I think that just because Asian Americans
> benefit from Affirmative Action (AA), I do not feel that it makes AA right.
> Especially if its at the expense of those it is trying to “help”.
>
Surely Garrick misunderstood Tim’s point here. Tim is defending
affirmative action not bc it benefits Asian-Americans, but bc (if I read
Tim correctly) it’s morally right.

> The best job security is to do a job well.

You seem to assume that there are always clear criteria for judging when
a job is done “well.” Truth is, intangibles enter into the picture, and
whoever is in power gets to define what they are. Example: just as
Asian-Americans were beginning to make inroads into prestigious
universities in the 70s and 80s, requirements for extracurricular
activities like sports (traditionally a weak area for Asian-Am),
leadership (whatever that means), etc. conveniently appeared. My Jewish
friends working for the Harvard admissions office in the 80s were
incensed that a secretive quota had been established for Asian-Am
admission (just as the one for Jewish applicants earlier this century),
tho they were prevented from talking about it. They were also puzzled
that Asian students didn’t
seem interested in speaking out against the quota, even tho they all
knew
about it.

Those of us who have to make it in the white world, in “mainstream
America,” know only too well the difference between the in-crowds and
outsiders. To be “in,” one has to speak the right way, tell the right
jokes, go to the right parties with your white colleagues, etc. And
even when you think you’ve done all the right things, the phone still
never rings….

> I feel that
> those in mainstream America, will only ever be seen as “equals” when race is
> no longer an issue in hiring. As long as AA exists, there will always be the
> question if a better qualified non-minority was passed over.
>
Yes, there is always that nagging doubt, as the African-American
conservative writer Steele has insightfully pointed out. But if there
is still no equality in hiring practices (and there isn’t), I’ll take
the possibility of job over mental security and worry about the latter
after I am fed.

Affirmative action is a complicated subject, and it is often debated in
terms dictated to us by political groups with their own (often hidden)
agendas. My challenge to CAC is to think through the issue both
ethnically and theologically–that is to say, as Asian-American
Christians.

Sze-kar Wan

— End —

To: TSTseng@aol.com, cac@bccn.org
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 01:47:29 -0600
Subject: CAC_Mail: Re: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?
From: gdot@juno.com (G Ottoson)

On Sun, 14 Sep 1997 00:06:14 -0400 (EDT) TSTseng@aol.com writes:

<>

Tax Breakers

too violent here in the present to wit
like death in a white Easter dress
too torn apart, too puffed to admit,
too slow to get down and confess

no tellin’ their grave imperiousness
no tellin’ the armies enslaved
too cheap, too involved in deleriousness
too bad and too good to be saved

sorrow they borrow and thinly drawn
like bubbles on turbulent froth
th’ future th’ rock they be stumbling on
th’ present eternally scoffed

no tellin’ the fury the seriousness
no tellin’ the people estranged
too proud and too furious their furiousness
too into religion to change

c. 1997 go

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 07:08:36 -0700
From: “Fong, Larry”
Subject: CAC_Mail: wanted: part-time Director of Christian Education in Castro Valle y
To: “‘cac@bccn.org'”

Our church, New Life Christian Fellowship (NLCF), is seeking a part-time
Director of Christian Education. NLCF is pastored by Russell Yee and is
affiliated with the American Baptist Churches of the West and is located
in Castro Valley. For more information, call Josh Fong at (510)
483-8973 or e-mail at joshfong@aol.com.

— End —

From: leungs
To: “TSTseng@aol.com”
Cc: “‘CAC'”
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the camp?
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 97 18:02:00 E

Topic: ethics, politics, economics
Subject: personal finance, economics; and “Affluenza”

Brother Tim,

I couldn’t help it, but i thought i would forward this announcement
concerning a show on PBS that might be of partial relevance to some of the
current discussion. Hope this reaches everyone in time for them to
view/record if they so desire.

*******************************************
PRIMETIME TELEVISION HIGHLIGHTS

Please always check with your local PBS station for a
complete schedule with exact dates and times. PBS
television schedules are created at the local level,
so some national programs may not be available in your
area.

**Broadcast times are in Eastern Time (ET) **
(CC) Indicates programs with closed captions
(WWW) Indicates programs with companion Web sites on
PBS Online (http://www.pbs.org/)

AFFLUENZA
Monday, September 15, 1997 (9-10:00 pm)
NPR’s Scott Simon hosts this special that traces the
historic roots of “affluenza” — an epidemic with
symptoms that include shopping, overwork, stress and
debt — and the advertising and marketing ploys
designed to sustain it. (CC, WWW)

———-

Also…

you wrote:
>When I preach, I don’t
>usually talk social analysis because that moment when the saints are
gathered
>is a special, sacred time of praise and ministration. To me, the
development
>of Christlike character is still the first and most important step for
>faithful local church ministry. On this point, I think most of us will
>agree. But once we get to the macrolevel, disagreements will abound.

But, i hope those who preach understand the import and impact of this sacred
time.

Sometimes i question the degree to which the members of Christ’s body are to
be so obsessed with particular political solutions (myself included). Our
influence as Christians must come first and foremost from personal testimony
of the Gospel — lived and proclaimed — and prayer for those that do
govern. Sometimes, our political activity get in the way of our message. I
also sincerely believe that living out of the gospel entails compassion and
care for the poorest of the poor, the oppressed, and the disenfranchised.

At the same time, (with or without political motivation) i would cite R.C.
Sproul who opines in “Choosing My Religion,” that an understanding of the
depravity of humankind should result in a worldview that will not center its
hopes on human institutions, e.g. (?big?) government. Question: are
governments (theocracies excluded) purely human institutions?

I could go on about being pro-capitalism and pro-competition from a
pragmatic point of view — with appropriate (regulatory and personal) checks
and provisions for justice. But, i’ll wait for another time.

In the Redeemer,
Stephen Leung

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:00:33 -0600
To: cac@bccn.org
From: rsisco@wheaton.edu (Rodney K. Sisco)
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action (AA)…

>In a message dated 14 Sep 1997 19:46 Garrick Pang wrote (in response to
>Tim Tseng): I feel that
>those in mainstream America, will only ever be seen as “equals” when race is
>no longer an issue in hiring. As long as AA exists, there will always be the
>question if a better qualified non-minority was passed over. It may gain us
>a job, but is it right?

Dear Garrick,

I am Rodney Sisco and I serve as the director of Minority Affairs at
Wheaton College. I read the comment and thought that I’d interject a
thought or two.

First, there is a collective cultural myth regarding “the most qualified.”
When a company (or in my case a college) states that they have hired the
most “qualified” individual one of the first questions I ask revolves
around what are determined as qualifications and in the nation (as it
currently is) who are the most likely people to meet those qualifications.
Where do we go to look for individuals who meet said qualifications and how
do we evaluate them. Unfortunately the national ethos is one that favors
non-minority individuals. The ethnic-minority is look upon with greater
scrutiny which provides areas that may fall short of “qualifications.”
Whereas the majority individual has the same qualifications and they might
be hired. Let me give a few exapmles:

Fall ’93 semester At U of I–Students were [cheating] on their dental
school work. They were to work to make dental molds. The same set of
teeth (mold) was turned in (at two different times). The black student
received a “C”; the white an “A”.

An issue of the same work being done (or at least the perception of being
done) by minority and majority…when done by majority it is an “A” when
done by minority it is a “C” the students involved filed suit and though
they failed the class for plagarism, the faculty was “reprimanded” for
racial bias.

In 1991 a report from the National Opinion Research Center at the
University of Chicago titled “Ethnic Images” studied racial tolerance in
the United States. The study revealed that nationwide, whites still
believe that blacks are viewed as lazier, less intelligent, less patriotic,
and more prone to violence than several other ethnic groups.

In 1991 a study titled “Opportunities Denied, Opportunities Diminished:
Discrimination in Hiring” is released. Ten pairs of men, ages 19-24,
responded to 476 randomly chosen entry level job listings in Washington
D.C. and Chicago. Trained to represent themselves as equals.

Denied jobs that are offered to equally qualified “other” tester.
Black: 15%
White 5%

The point I am trying to raise (though using examples of black and white)
is that there are far too many situations wherein equally “qualified”
individuals find the swing of opportunities going to the majority
poulation. Affirmative Action means that at times people who are more than
“qualified” have their credentials scrutinized while others with far less
qualifications never ask themselves the same question. At times we need to
stop being concerned as to what others think and operate in our
strength…that is recognize that if one were not qualified then they would
not be in place.

My second thought has to do with a far greater question. Historically many
ethnic groups that have entered the USA has had their time of being treated
unfairly. History is replete with the treatment of Irish, Polish, even
German as they enter the United States. However, there have been few
instances where the treatment have not had a Psuedo-psycho babble attached
to it. “They are less intelligent, they are bread to be hard workers, they
are good with numbers – yet lousy with people, they are shifty and
dangerous” are all stereotypes that have been ‘assigned’ to Asian
Americans. The effect is that there are individuals who to this day still
hold some of these ideas. Thus the statement addresses the issue of “why
are they different and why don’t they try to fit in” In the college
setting I hear this frequently yet a Univeristy of Michigan study on campus
living found that the majority are the least responsive to interacting
outside of their ethnic group:

The research sample base is 6,000 students from 390 schools, who were
surveyed in 1987 and again in 1991. The results were fairly similar on
campuses with large or small percentages of minority students. Key
findings:

* Students stating that they frequently dine with someone from a
different
racial or ethnic group.

78% Latino Students
69% Asian American Students
55% African American Students
21% White Students

* Students stating that they frequently study with someone from a
different racial or ethnic group.

72% Latino Students
60% Asian American Students
49% African American Students
15% White Students

* Students stating that they frequently date someone outside their own
racial or ethnic group.

42% Latino
24% Asian American
13% African American
4% White

Source: National On-Campus Report, May 6, 1994, Page 3

The discussion could go on for quite a while. Race in America is a complex
and at times frustrating issue. Too often the discussion from the majority
community is one of dismissing the discussion to a frocus on being
color-blind. This is especially true within Christian circles. Essentially
the discussion of Affirmative Action needs to understand the complexity of
race on both the macro level and the micro level. On the macro level their
are growing social, political and economic forces that do not encourage a
genuine interaction between cultural groups since that interaction would
disrupt those who are already in the places of comfort. The historical
analysis of the systematic exclusion of groups of people for multiple
generations only to recently (last 30 years at best) see some changes is
absurd if it assumes that everything is justly distributed. Equally the
assertion that since there is now a ‘level playing field’ there is no need
to deal with the ramifications of the systematic exclusion from earlier.
Andrew Ward a commentator for the National Public Radio program “All Things
Considered.” put it this way in the New York Times 2/7/89:

A lot of people, most of them white, call affirmative action
“reverse discrimination” and wonder why black people shouldn’t be satisfied
with a simple repudiation of discrimination of any kind. With its ruling
striking down minority set-asides in city construction contracts, the
Supreme Court seems to have decided that affirmative action programs in
general violate white people’s right to equal protection.

But in case a majority of their honors might still have an open
mind on the subject, I offer a little metaphor in affirmative action’s
defense. It comes in the form of a football metaphor because I have a
feeling that the conservative majority on the Rehnquist Court might
appreciate a football metaphor. So here goes:

The White Team and the Black Team are playing the last football
game of the season. The White Team owns the stadium, owns the referees and
has been allowed to field nine times as many players. For almost four
quarters, the White Team has cheated on every play and, as a consequence,
the score is White Team 140, Black Team 3. Only 10 seconds remain in the
game, but as the White quarterback huddles with his team before the final
play, a light suddenly shines from his eyes.

“So how about it, boys?” he asks his men. “What do you say from
here on we play fair?”

On a final note. The complexity of race relations in the latter part of
the 20th century has been the fact that the growth of discussion of race
has assumed that “racism” has been dismantled which is far from the truth.
In no uncertain terms issues of race and race relations persist, yet the
discussion is moved to one of performance. How does one “perform” well
when the standard is drastically different? To what degree does one “pull
themselves up” if the goal is either ever-changing or simply unatainable.
I have seen this in terms of degrees needed for a position and then when
one is found with sufficient degrees…then additional publications and
when one is found with publications and degree…simply a good “fit.”
“Fit” an unmeasurable term which is the basis on which many decisions are
made regarding people of color in the market-place. For the person already
within a position and trying to advance then there raises the issue what
are the percieved standards whereby one is evaluated. In short I agree
that one should be evaluated on merit alone, yet in this nation there is a
different standard for”merit” compared to different groups. Proving that
one has unfairly been treated requires a lot of additional information and
ignores the other “affirmative action” programs within corporate
settings…desinated ‘fast-track’ individuals who are given the assignments
that bring visibility etc.

I am not stating that Affirmative Action is the end all and be all, nor
that it is the best solution. At best it is a flawed answer to a broad and
complex challenge. Perhaps we can enter into discussion as to what might
be better solutions. I pray that the Lord continue to give us wisdom as we
encourage others.

There is a whole lot more to write…but this is too long already. hope it
is positive food for thought.

In His service

Rodney Sisco

*********************************************
Peace and Mercy unto you…Long Life and Joy follow you
Rodney K. Sisco

— End —

From: JLoFEC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 17:35:38 -0400 (EDT)
To: owner-cac@emwave.net
Subject: Chinese-American Pastors

Hello friends (I’ve never posted here before … hope I’m sending this to the right place…)

My name is John Lo. I’m a second-generation Chinese-American pastor who’s
been serving in a Chinese Church in Los Angeles for 7 years. (I serve as one
of four English pastors in a multi-lingual, multi-congregational Chinese
church I do youth and young adults ministry). I’ve enjoyed the ministry, and
currently have a group of young people who are just entering seminary.

Part of my responsibility to them as pastor and mentor is to prepare them for
what’s “out there” in terms of ministry. I guess that’s why I’m writing. I
want to find out some answers.

I admit that I haven’t really been connected to the Chinese-American or
Asian-American church scene the way I probably should have. So I have a
question.

I’m wondering how many thirty-something ABC pastors are out there, and what
the drop-out rate has been over the last ten years. Anecdotally, it seems to
me that a number of people that I’ve known and been relating to as ABC
pastors over the past few years in the So Cal area haven’t been able to hang
in there, or at least, flourish in their ministries. Some have had to move
from one place to another; others have decided to do the PhD route or the
counseling thing …

My question is two-fold:
(a) what has the drop-out rates for thirty-something ABC pastors been? What
do you think have been the reasons for the drop-off?
(b) how many twenty-something seminarians and young pastors are out there,
and do they face the same circumstances? Should we expect the same kind of
drop-off ratios, or has anything changed out there?

I have one recent graduate from Fuller who’s looking for work, three students
in Fuller and a couple more on the way … I’m beginning to worry for them.
Do I have reason to?

I guess I’d appreciate both anecdotal responses as well as the “hard facts”.

Thanks for your time.

John Lo

_______________
Rev. John Lo
First Evangelical Church, Glendale
522 W. Broadway, Glendale, CA 91204
(818) 240-5633
JLoFEC@aol.com
_______________

— End —

From: “Cheuk, Clarence”
Organization: Wheaton College
To: HarryWLew@aol.com, cac@bccn.org, TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 23:22:04 CST6CDT
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

Hello all,

I hope I am doing this correctly; this is the
first time I am writing to the CAC. My name is Clarence Cheuk and I
am a junior at Wheaton College. I am a second-generation ABC who has
taken the job of large-group coordinator of the Asian-American
fellowship here on the campus of Wheaton College. I was just
wonderning if y’all can help me with ideas of activities or meetings.
We want to swirl cultural awareness and worship. And we want are
activities to facillitate this dual purpose. Any suggestions???
Thanks for your time…

Clarence Cheuk
CCHEUK@ACNET.Wheaton.edu

— End —

From: GAPang@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 19:52:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: wans@monet.bc.edu, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action

Thank you for your insightful comments. I don’t agree with you 100%, but
certainly appreciate hearing another perspective. This is what I enjoy about
CAC.

Your brother in Christ,

Garrick

PS – was the Harvard “quota” meant to increase or limit Asian enrollment? I used to work in higher ed. admissions, so was just curious.

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 23:01:14 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action

GAPang@aol.com wrote:
>
> PS – was the Harvard “quota” meant to increase or limit Asian enrollment? I
> used to work in higher ed. admissions, so was just curious.
>
“Quota” as it was conceived in the 60s was a target which hopefully
would represent the population. The Harvard quota was used to keep
Asian-Am at an artificial level, something like 15%. You draw the
conclusion.

Warmly,
Sze-kar

— End —

From: DCChuang@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 00:09:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: TSTseng@aol.com
cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

In a message dated 97-09-15 14:52:48 EDT, you write:

<>

Thanks for clearing that up, was wondering if I had quit my job this weekend and started working for FRC :). DC

— End —

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 00:35:43 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: CAC_Mail: All Labels all that helpful?

The Rev. Lew’s observation that CAC is a “liberal” list is rather
puzzling–for two reasons.

(1) It is simply not true. As contributor to the list and someone who
occasionally agrees with Tim’s political views, I suppose I could be
regarded as espousing “liberal” views. But who else might the Reverend
be thinking of? The almost uniformly negative reactions to my PK
postings last month would lead me to the opposite conclusion, that CAC
can be stiflingly “conservative” (in Lew’s sense). Are we so afraid
even to entertain new thoughts?!

(2) The Rev. Lew uses the term “liberal” in a negative sense, with
perhaps the assumption that “conservative” is good. Shades of George
Bush’s 1988 compaign strategy. But why is “liberal” bad and
“conservative” good? Just bc the Rev. Lew himself is conservative?
Surely there must be more compelling reasons.

Now a fable: The bomb is dropped in Hiroshima. The city reels in
disbelief. Citizens stumble around with shreds of burnt flesh hanging
from their bodies. The medical staff cannot handle the overwhelming
number of victims. A survivor emerges from the rubbles and begins to
treat the wounded on his own. A doctor comes over and asks to see his
credentials. When he finds out that this man has never had any medical
training (for he is a mere theology student), he throws him out and
would not let him continue.

Moral: We live in a post-Christian age. Secularism, materialism,
hedonism, cynicism, and whatnot explode all around us. I will work with
anyone who is willing to challenge all these, regardless of faith,
gender, ethnicity, etc. I would even work with “sinners,” for God knows
I am one. And anyone who acknowledges Jesus as the Christ, I will call
brother or sister, regardless of theological convictions or doctrines.
This does not mean doctrinal issues are irrelevant; it only means we
should set our priorities straight. I hope we are Christians first
before we are “evangelicals,” “pentacostals,” “liberals,” etc.

It’s time we think through carefully who we are, instead of being led by
this or that label. We are Asian-American Christians. Of the three
terms in our hyphenated existence, “Christian” abides always.

Warmly,
Sze-kar Wan

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 00:35:32 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: CAC_Mail: AAAS East of California conference at NYU

CACers:

FYI, Tim
==========7TH ANNUAL EAST OF CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE

“RETHINKING PARADIGMS, RETHINKING STRATEGIES FOR ASIAN AMERICAN
STUDIES”

New York University

November 14-15, 1997

Association for Asian American Studies

Registration Information and Tentative Schedule

This conference will provide an engaging way for a wide range of
students, faculty, staff and community activists and community members
to explore and revisit “old” and “new” paradigms in and affecting Asian
American Studies. In particular, we would like to address the dramatic
change in Asian American demographics over the past 25 years, the
concomitant global restructuring of capital and how the process of
racialization is never based on just “race,” but is determined by a
number of raced, classed, gendered and sexualized positionings. How do
programs, such as NYU’s A/P/A Studies, build curricula that respond to
its surrounding immigrant communities? How does it develop effective,
meaningful and accountable strategies for Asian American community
studies?

In addition, with the heavy demand and subsequent growth of Asian
American Studies east of California, the need for revisiting and
rethinking strategies for institutionalization are more important now
than ever. This is especially true for undergraduates who are without
Asian American Studies faculty at their respective schools. Many
undergraduates are given the run-around by administrators or are
navigated through institutional red tape or are promised that other
interdisciplinary programs are where Asian American Studies should be
housed. The conference seeks to address the specific needs of
undergraduates who are struggling with these issues. In a number of
workshops, we will discuss institutional politics examining “case
studies” of different schools. In addition, we will announce the East
of California Network’s new “Starters Packet” of Asian American Studies
materials for students interested in getting Asian American Studies on
their campus. To develop stronger institutional bases, there will also
be sessions on building Asian American faculty and administrator ties,
and addressing graduate student / junior faculty career, publishing and
tenure issues.

TENTATIVE SCHEDULE:

[Final Schedule to be announced soon]

Friday November 14:

5:00-9:00pm Registration

Location: A/P/A Studies: 269 Mercer St. 6th Fl., Cross street: West 4th
Street, New York City

6:00-7:30pm Welcome Reception

Location: A/P/A Studies: 269 Mercer St., 6th Fl.

7:30-9:00pm Plenary I: “East of California: Paradigm Shifts,
Strategic Shifts”

Moderator: John Kuo Wei Tchen, New York University

Speakers: Peter Kiang, University of Massachusetts, Boston

Nazli Kibria, Boston University

Sucheta Mazumdar, Duke University

Gary Okihiro, Cornell University

Leti Volpp, National Employment Law Project

Location: 703 Main Building

9:00-10:00pm EoC Coordinating Committee Meeting

Saturday November 15:

9:00-9:30am Breakfast Served

9:30-11:00am Concurrent Workshop Sessions:

A. Student Organizing Strategies for AAS

B. Faculty & Staff: helping to establish AAS

11:15-12:45pm Concurrent Workshop Sessions:

A. Student Organizing: Part II

B. Grad Student & Junior Faculty Meeting: Careers, Publishing,
Tenure

C. Asian American Faculty and Administrators

12:45-2:00pm Lunch [On Your Own]

2:00-3:30pm Concurrent Roundtable Sessions:

A. Community Based Research & Collaborations with Community-based
Groups

B. Community-based Urban Planning in Immigrant Communities

C. Strategies for Pedagogy in Asian American Studies

D. Transnational, Diaspora and Asian American Studies

3:45-5:00pm Concurrent Roundtable Sessions

A. Asian American Sexualities: Struggles for Community

B. Youth Fighting for Social Change

C. Arts, Culture & Activism in Asian American Communities

D. Work, Immigration and Economic Restrcturing

5:15-6:30pm Plenary II: “New York City: New Immigration and Global
Restructuring”

6:45-9:00pm Dinner Provided and Reading with the Asian American
Writers Workshop and Kaya Production

Registration:

Name:_____________________________

Address:___________________________

__________________________________

Institution:_________________________

City:_____________________State:_____

Zip:______________

Home Phone:_______________________

Work Phone:_______________________

Registration Cost if Postmarked by 10/7/97:

Students (AAAS member) $10
Faculty/Staff/Community Members (AAAS member) 40
Students (Non-member) 15
Faculty/Staff/Community Members (Non-member) 45

Registration Cost After 10/7/97:

Students (AAAS member) 15
Faculty/Staff/Community Members (AAAS member) 45
Students (Non-member) 25
Faculty/Staff/Community Members (Non-member) 50

Total Enclosed Fees: $_________

Please make checks payable to “New York University” and send to

East of California Conference
Asian/Pacific/American Studies Program
New York University
269 Mercer Street, 6th Fl.
New York, NY 10003-6687

Housing (For Students Only)

____Yes, I am interested in free student housing

Hotel Accommodations are available at:

Discounted hotel rooms may be reserved until 14 October 1997 at

Washington Sqaure Hotel
103 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10011
800-222-0418/212-777-9515
Single: $109.80/night, Double: $129.60/night
Please mention East of California Conference and reference #: 1114

and:

Club Quarters Downtown
(212) 229-3802
52 William Street, in the Wall Street Area

Rates: $79-$89 for single occupancy, $12.50 for additional guest.

Please note: Subway or Taxi is necessary to reach the conference from
this hotel.

These accommodations are reserved for guests of New York University and
have been arranged specifically for this event. Please mention the
conference when making reservations. Reservations should be made by
October 14, 1997 to ensure availability.

Bios on the Plenary Panelists:

Dr. Peter N. Kiang is Associate Professor in the Graduate College of
Education and American Studies Program at the University of
Massachusetts Boston where he teaches graduate courses in urban
education and multicultural curriculum design and undergraduate courses
in Asian American Studies. Peter is recognized nationally for his
research and advocacy related to immigrants and people of color in both
K-12 and higher education. Currently, his work focuses on analyzing
racial conflict in schools; developing leadership in immigrant and
refugee communities; and ensuring access by communities of color to the
Information Superhighway.

Nazli Kibria is assistant professor of Sociology at Boston University
and the author of Family Tightrope: The Changing Lives of Vietnamese
Americans.

Sucheta Mazumdar is assistant professor in the Department of History at
Duke University and the author of the forthcoming Sugar and Society:
Peasants, Technology and the World Market (1997) and coeditor of
forthcoming Antinomies of Modernity: Essays on Orientalism, Race, and
Ethnicity. She is also the founder and editor of South Asia Bulletin /
Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

Gary Y. Okihiro is professor history and director of the Asian American
Studies Program at Cornell University. He is author of Margins and
Mainstreams: Asians in American History and Culture (1994) and
Whispered Silences: Japanese Americans and World War II (1996). He is
a past president of the Association for Asian American Studies.

Leti Volpp is a legal theorist who writes about the intersection of
race, gender, culture, nation and the law. She has published articles
in the Columbia Law Review, the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties
Law Review and the Harvard Women’s Law Journal about asserting human
rights for garment workers in the global economy and about the impact
of “cultural defenses” on Asian American women. She is also a public
interest lawyer practicing in the areas of workplace rights, immigrants
rights, civil rights, and women’s rights, and is currently a staff
attorney at the National Employment Law Project in New York. She was a
member of the legal team representing the Thai workers enslaved as
garment workers in El Monte, CA, and is currently representing the deaf
Mexican immigrants who were forced to sell trinkets on the New York
City subways. In addition, she is a former board member of the New
York Asian Women’s Center and the San Francisco Asian Women’s Shelter
and is the author of the handbook Working With Battered Immigrant
Women: A Handbook to Make Services Accessible.

Information on the East of California Network:

The East of California Network is a caucus within the Association for
Asian American Studies (AAAS) formed to promote the regional interests
of the Association’s Midwest and East Coast regions. Members of the
Network, accordingly, should be members of the AAAS. The Network meets
twice annually, in the fall at a member campus and in the spring at the
annual meeting of the AAAS.

The goals of the Network are:

(1) to institutionalize Asian American Studies;
(2) to develop regional-specific research and publications; and
(3) to provide mutual support to individuals and programs.

—————-
Tomio Geron
Asian/Pacific/American Studies
New York University
269 Mercer St., Room 604
NY, NY 10003-6687
212-998-3697
fax 995-4705

http://www.nyu.edu/pages/apa.studies/

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 22:13:56 -0700
To: cac@bccn.org
From: Jeffrey Kuan
Subject: CAC_Mail: Asian Americans Charge Fund-Raising Scandal Bias

>>>http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/FRONT/t000081020.html
>>>[Los Angeles Times] [FRONT PAGE]
>>>[Hollywood Online]
>>> Friday, September 12, 1997
>>>
>>> Asian Americans Charge Fund-Raising Scandal Bias
>>> Civil rights: Individuals, 14 groups file federal
>>>
>>> complaint. They allege widespread ethnic stereotyping.
>>> By K. CONNIE KANG, ROBERT L. JACKSON, Times Staff Writers
>>>
>>>
>>> PREV [I] n an unprecedented action for their community, a
>>> STORY coalition of prominent Asian Americans and 14
>>> organizations filed a complaint Thursday with the U.S.
>>> NEXT Commission on Civil Rights, accusing Congress, political
>>> STORY parties and the news media of widespread stereotyping and
>>> scapegoating of Asian Americans during the campaign
>>> fund-raising scandal.
>>> The complaint, brought by the American Civil Liberties
>>> Union of Northern California and a San Francisco law firm,
>>> calls on the commission to probe the “discriminatory impact”
>>> on Asian Americans of actions by elected officials, the
>>> Democratic and Republican national committees and the news
>>> media. The filing was announced at news conferences in Los
>>> Angeles and Washington.
>>> “Asian Americans are facing the most profound crisis we
>>> have seen since the internment of Japanese Americans over 50
>>> years ago,” said former Los Angeles City Councilman Michael
>>> Woo.
>>> Despite their successes in professions, academia and
>>> businesses, Asian Americans have lagged behind in politics,
>>> partly because discriminatory laws barred them from
>>> naturalizing until the 1950s.
>>> During last year’s presidential campaign, a number of
>>> people of Asian descent assumed important roles as
>>> fund-raisers and contributors for the Democratic Party. But a
>>> widening scandal has engulfed their efforts as federal
>>> investigations have probed illegal foreign contributions.
>>> Among those who have figured most prominently in Senate
>>> Governmental Affairs Committee hearings now underway are John
>>> Huang, formerly a top fund-raiser for the Democratic National
>>> Committee, and Yah Lin “Charlie” Trie, a friend of President
>>> Clinton who allegedly collected hundreds of thousands of
>>> dollars in questionable overseas donations.
>>> The petition filed Thursday asked that the Civil Rights
>>> Commission schedule hearings to explore the controversy’s
>>> impact on the country’s 10 million people of Asian ancestry.
>>> “No other ethnic group has had to go through this kind
>>> of experience,” said Charlie Woo, a prosperous Los Angeles
>>> toy manufacturer who is one of four named petitioners.
>>> Woo, who donated $7,500 to the DNC last year, said he
>>> was subjected to “humiliating questioning” by a DNC auditor
>>> about his citizenship and income, solely because of his Asian
>>> surname.
>>> Some of the nation’s most important institutions, the
>>> petition said, have acted “irresponsibly and carelessly” in
>>> responding to allegations of wrongdoing by relatively few
>>> Asian Americans and immigrants.
>>> “Numerous elected officials, including members of the
>>> House and Senate and candidates for public office, have made
>>> racially biased or offensive remarks to the public and in the
>>> media, contributing to an environment of antagonism toward
>>> Asian Pacific Americans and immigrants,” the petitioners
>>> charged in the 28-page complaint.
>>> Among the examples cited were comments by:
>>> * Sen. Robert F. Bennett (R-Utah): “In my opinion, Mr.
>>> Trie’s activities are classic activities on the part of an
>>> Asian who comes from out of that culture and who embarks on
>>> an activity relating to intelligence gathering.”
>>> * Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.): “No raise money, no make
>>> bonus,” referring to Huang’s salary arrangement with the DNC.
>>>
>>> * Sen. Pete V. Domenici (R-N.M.): “I don’t believe
>>> there’s any Asia bashing. . . . We ought to get on with
>>> immunizing these little nuns and monks, so we aren’t worried
>>> about discriminating against them.”
>>> The remarks, the petition said, “speak to the depth of
>>> disrespect toward Asian Pacific Americans by many in our
>>> society and governing institutions.”
>>> “It is highly doubtful whether any U.S. senator would so
>>> readily offer similar derogatory reference or stereotypes
>>> about African Americans, women or Jews in the course of
>>> congressional proceedings or to the national press.”
>>> Richard Hurtling, spokesman for the Republican-majority
>>> Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, said: “We’ve never
>>> focused on anyone’s ethnic background. We’re looking at
>>> individuals, political parties and candidates and how they
>>> have allowed illegal acts to occur.”
>>> DNC officials said they, too, deplore “the rampant
>>> demonization of the Asian Pacific American community,”
>>> claiming that they are continuing to take steps to assist
>>> “the integration of citizens-in-waiting and new citizens into
>>> our party and our country’s democratic institutions.”
>>> The goal of the complaint, said Dale Minami, one of the
>>> lawyers handling the case, is to educate the American public.
>>>
>>> “If you can reach some people to finally understand that
>>> Asian Americans are part of this multicolored tapestry we
>>> call America, then we will have accomplished something,” he
>>> said.
>>> “We’ve been here for hundreds of years. We are citizens
>>> and we belong here, yet we are treated as foreigners.”
>>> Stewart Kwoh, president of the Asian Pacific American
>>> Legal Center, said that Asian American donors were singled
>>> out, while campaign finance violations by other contributors
>>> received scant coverage in the news media.
>>> “What we demand is fair treatment,” he said. “What we’re
>>> saying is: ‘Cover us equally.’ ”
>>> Charles Rivera, a spokesman for the commission, said the
>>> petition probably would be considered at the panel’s meeting
>>> on Oct. 10.
>>> Kang reported from Los Angeles and Jackson reported from
>>> Washington.
>>>
>>> Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar
>>> stories. You will not be charged to look for stories, only to
>>> retrieve one.
>>>
>>> Copyright Los Angeles Times
2332 Virginia Street
Berkeley, CA 94709
Tel: (510) 649-8949

— End —

From: TSTseng@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:54:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: Re: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action (AA)…

Rodney:

Thanks for your erudite posting about the complexity of contemporary race
relations and the significance of affirmative action – flawed as it is – for
minorities in the U.S. Both Sze-kar and I write from personal experiences
and our hopes that America (and American Christianity) will one day reflect
Martin Luther King’s vision of the “beloved community” so we feel rather
passionate about this issue. So thank you for providing some “hard” facts to the debate!

Sze-Kar:

Dana Tagaki wrote a book entitled _The Retreat from Race: Asian Admissions
and Racial Politics_ (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992)
which traces successful efforts by Asian Americans to show how some
universities subtly imposed ceilings on numbers of Asian admissions in the
mid-1980s – something you alluded to.

Tim

In a message dated 9/15/97 3:13:11 PM, you wrote:

<>

————————————————————
Rev. Dr. Timothy Tseng
Sallie Knowles Crozer Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Colgate-Rochester Divinity School
1100 South Goodman Street
Rochester, NY 14620
OFF: (716) 271-1320, ext. 260
FAX: (716) 271-8013
Email: tstseng@aol.com
————————————————————

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 23:29:15 -0700
From: Ken Fong
To: TSTseng@aol.com
CC: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?

Just thought I’d throw in my support of this current dialogue. Very
healthy, imho. I, for one, am one of those evangelical AsiAm Christians
who is quite leery of the religious right, who seem to have no problem
draping themselves in the flag. While I’m very, very grateful for the
opportunity to have been born and raised in America, I have long been
uncomfortable with equating patriotism with holy living; being a good
American with being a good Christian. As more of a centrist in my
political leanings, I often find that I cannot wholeheartedly agree with
the entire platforms of either the right or the left. Instead, I try
very hard to examine each issue on its own merits, weighing against the
kingdom principles I read in Scripture and see reflected in Jesus’ life.

Just as much as I think it’s healthy to be able to critique people like
Dobson (no one is righteous, not even one), I think it is extremely
unhealthy to believe that any human being, Christian or not, should
never be challenged. In my neck of the woods, it seems like criticizing
something about Dobson is tantamount to criticizing Christ. As much as
Dobson probably doesn’t enjoy his former partner’s criticism, I have to
believe that even he would agree that he’s not in Christ’s league.

If any of you are interested in reading a book that, among other things,
critiques Dobson’s and many of our extra-conservative brethrens’ ‘focus
on the family’ these days, in light of biblical precedence and
socio-cultural developments, try reading Rodney Clapp’s “Families at the
Crossroads” (IVP). When I shared with my wife some of his perspectives
that accuse Dobson of propagating an unbiblically narrow emphasis on the
nuclear family, she told me “You’d better be careful not to say those
things in public or people will think you’re a heretic!” Seems to me
that, if in fact that attitude does exist out there, i.e., Dobson’s
teachings are sacred and eternal truth, then something is definitely
wrong. Yes, we do need to be extremely concerned about the well-being
of families, not just ours, not just American ones, but all families.
And yes, at the same time, we need to be careful not to turn a focus on
families into another idol.

’nuff said.
ken fong

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 23:36:02 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: wans@monet.bc.edu
CC: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action

Brother Sze-kar… just wanted you to know that I really found your
comments thoughtful and on target. When the ‘rules’ of the ‘game’ are
still defined by one group, it may always be impossible to compete on
equal footing.

I find myself wondering more and more these days what the response of
the white majority is going to be when, numerically, they are no longer
the majority in this country. Census folk say this day will dawn in
2056 for the country as a whole. For SoCal, we’re almost there already.
Will people of color still be called ‘minorities’ when everyone will be
a minority? Will the percentages in the board rooms of corporate
America and in the administrations of our Christian organizations and
institutions reflect this pluralistic reality or will the reins of power
still be retained by white males?

You might find these to be interesting comments from the person who
started that whole long dialogue about PK that resulted in so many
subscription cancellations! Hey, I’m hard to label!

ken fong

— End —

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 23:53:31 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: “Rodney K. Sisco”
CC: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Affirmative Action (AA)…

imho, excellent discourse, Rodney. Please allow me to share a
particularly frustrating experience I had several years ago as part of a
search committee for an associate provost for Fuller Seminary.

I was invited to serve on the committee as a graduate of the DMin
program. That was the stated reason. A stronger one that I felt was
because I was AsiAm. The search comm. was a good blend of colors and
genders. We all started with the expressed desire to create as diverse
a pool of qualified applicants as possible. After many weeks of sifting
and sorting, we ended up with four white males in the pool, with the job
eventually going to one of them. In fairness to everyone on the
committee, we were all extremely frustrated with the outcome. Not with
the quality of the eventual choice. But that the pool of candidates
ended up being exactly what we didn’t want it to be.

What did God teach me through this experience? That even when everyone
involved wants desperately to be able to select a person of color for a
top spot in a highly regarded Christian institution, more often than
not, they will still end up having to select from the same pool of white
male candidates. This occurs, I believe, because the process itself has
at least one serious flaw in it. Namely, it waits too long before
looking for likely candidates of color. Reputable institutions
understandably need to fill slots with highly capable, highly regarded
people. Looking for people of color who fit this description at the
point that we did was doomed to fail, imho, because much, much earlier,
say at least a decade earlier, no one in that kind of position ever
encouraged any person of color to pursue that academic and career path.
No mentoring. No opening of doors. As a result, when a top spot opens
up, there a scarcely any people of color who have the necessary pedigree
and distinction to be added to the pool.

Waiting until the last minute to look for people of color is a big
mistake that will only perpetuate the status quo, even when everyone’s
desire is to see people of color get a shot. With no models, with no
encouragement, people of color have learned to take other routes fraught
with fewer roadblocks.

ken fong
sr. pastor
Evergreen Bapt. Church of Los Angeles

— End —

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 00:00:58 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: wans@monet.bc.edu
CC: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: All Labels all that helpful?

I’m with you, Sze-kar! I’m a See-ker!

in him,
ken fong

— End —

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 00:15:04 -0700
From: Ken Fong
Organization: Evergreen Baptist Church
To: JLoFEC@aol.com
CC: owner-cac@emwave.net
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors

>From where I sit, I’ve seen quite a number of ABC pastors dropping out
altogether or, more recently, resigning from churches where the sr.
pastor is obc. I’m sure the reasons are quite varied. What I hear,
though, is endless frustration with ABC ministries being treated like
second-rate things in the church and ABC ministers being seen as junior
pastors forever. Some obc sr. pastors, i’ve been told, are feeling led
to move their split congregations back to being one…with bilingual
being the buzzword. To many ABC pastors, this is a big step in the
wrong direction. In the main, there is a high degree of frustration out
there. That’s why so many seminary grads are trying to start new
churches that specialize in ministering to ABCs.

One other reason: some of our colleagues, apparently, might have
misheard the Lord. Bad fit. Not suited for the pastorate.

Last one: there’s been too many recent grads who arrived at their first
posting with too much arrogance, unwilling to listen first and learn how
the Spirit had been working with that church for decades already. They
came across as if the Spirit showed up with them. Most of those brethen
are no longer at those churches or even in the ministry. A shame, a
real shame.

that’s it from here.

ken fong.

— End —

To: JLoFEC@aol.com
Cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Chinese-American Pastors
From: steveandwinnie@juno.com (Stephen N Wong)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 13:11:07 EDT

Brother John,

I have a friend in New York who thinks that us West Coasters are just
“soft” and that’s why we don’t last in the pastorate : ) Seriously, I
think that what your church is doing to mentor seminarians and intern
seminary grads is the key to their survival. I also know of several
Chinese-American pastors who’ve left the pastorate. It seems that the
leadership of many immigrant Chinese churches thinks that their role is
to “prove” young pastors rather than to develop and nurture them. I
doubt if we can change the minds and hearts of these leaders, so it seems
that we need to develop a network of churches like yours to mentor these
young church leaders and stem the “drop-off rate.”

For the Kingdom,

Steve Wong

— End —

From: gdot@juno.com
To: TSTseng@aol.com, sling@chinahorizon.org
Cc: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: NEWS: dissension in the Dobson camp?
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 13:51:54 EDT

Dear Sam and Tim,

Yep; some ‘openmindedness’ would help us to not only understand China
better but would help us to understand ourselves and people in general.

Are you guys into rules and regulations? Rodney’s humorous football story
reminded me of a list that someone sent to me, ff. Can you imagine what
Groucho and Karl could say about this 🙂

>>Toddler’s Rules of Property
>>
>>1. If I like it, it’s mine.
>>
>>2. If it’s in my hand, it’s mine.
>>
>>3. If I can take it from you, it’s mine.
>>
>>4. If I had it a little while ago, it’s mine.
>>
>>5. If it’s mine, it must not ever appear to be yours in any way.
>>
>>6. If I’m doing or building something, all of the pieces are mine.
>>
>>7. If it looks just like mine, it’s mine.
>>
>>8. If I saw it first, it’s mine.
>>
>>9. If you’re playing with something and you put it down, it
>>automatically becomes mine.
>>
>>10. If it’s broken, it’s yours.

G

On Tue, 16 Sep 1997 02:11:05 -0400 (EDT) TSTseng@aol.com writes:

<>

— End —

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 12:12:54 -0400
From: Sze-kar Wan
To: CAC
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Are Labels all that helpful?

Ken Fong wrote:
> I’m with you, Sze-kar! I’m a See-ker!
>
> in him,
> ken fong
>
You are entirely welcome, Ken. Seek and you shall fong!

Sze-kar:-)

— End —

From: GAPang@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 13:12:46 -0400 (EDT)
To: wans@monet.bc.edu, cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: All Labels all that helpful?

In a message dated 97-09-16 09:01:49 EDT, wans@monet.bc.edu (Sze-kar Wan)
writes:

<>

Amen Sze-kar!

And I hope we all remember that we are members of the race of “human”, before we are “Asians”.

Garrick Pang

— End —

From: HarryWLew@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 23:50:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: cac@bccn.org
Subject: Re: CAC_Mail: Asian Americans Charge Fund-Raising Scandal Bias

Dear CACers:

All this whining from these Asian-American political lackeys and Friends of
Bill and Hillary strike me as quite ludicrous.

Especially laughable is Michael Woo’s remark, “Asian Americans are facing
the most profound crisis we have seen since the internment of Japanese
Americans over 50 years ago.”

“Crisis”??? He’s got to be kidding!

Pertaining to politics, wasn’t it Harry S. Truman who said something like,
“If you stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!”?

So we Asian Americans can “play the race card” too. Frankly, aren’t we
contributing to more “race fatigue”?

Yours in Christ,
Harry Lew

— End —